Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
M/s Maple Technologies Ltd. v. Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that defences regarding cheque issuance as security and loan write-back are factual disputes for trial and cannot be decided at the summoning stage.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. C J International Hotels Ltd.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in refiling income tax appeals but dismissed them as the issues were covered by a prior decision against the revenue, with no substantial question of law arising.
Raminder Singh v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 52(1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act was validly issued within the limitation period after excluding the time allowed to respond under Section 148A, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the reopening of assessment.
Nitesh Arora and Ors. v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Others v. State & Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the summoning order under section 138 NI Act, holding that disputed issues of repayment and cheque validity are to be decided at trial and that security cheques can be enforced if the underlying debt remains unpaid.
M/s Maple Technologies Ltd. v. M/s Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. & Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that cheques issued as security become enforceable if the loan is unpaid, and defenses on validity and liability are to be examined at trial.
Rakesh Kumar Mohindroo v. Income Tax Officer Ward 59(3) Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax Officer to provide material supporting allegations of a fictitious loan, allow the petitioner to respond, and hold a personal hearing before framing an assessment order under Section 148A.
Best Crop Science Pvt. Ltd. v. Superintendent, CGST, Delhi West and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a show cause notice issued beyond six months from the seizure or order of prohibition under Section 67 of the CGST Act is not invalid, rejecting the petitioner's limitation challenge.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -5 v. Jubilant Energy Kharsang (P) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against the ITAT order for AY 2008-09, holding that claims for statutory dues excluded from an NCLT-approved insolvency resolution plan are not maintainable post-approval.
Orion Security Solutions P. Ltd v. DCIT Circle 19 (1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that tax recovery pending appeal cannot exceed 20% of the crystallized tax demand as per the assessment order, including adjustments for TDS and TCS, and directed refund of excess amounts recovered.
Vikas Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Shubham Chhillar v. State and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279, 337, and 338 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Mentor Graphics (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging the Tribunal's exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing for AY 2008-09, holding that the Tribunal's factual findings are final and no substantial question of law arises.
Surestha v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application in a case involving assault on a minor, directing the petitioner to cooperate with investigation and allowing arrest only after four weeks’ notice.
M/S Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd & Others v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that alleged theft and invalidity of cheques are defenses to be examined at trial, not at the cognizance stage.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that provident fund deposits made on the next working day following a national holiday due date qualify for deduction under the Income Tax Act, but deposits beyond the due date cannot be claimed merely because they precede filing of the return.
M/S Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd & Others v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that defenses regarding stolen cheque and stop payment cannot be adjudicated at the summoning stage and must be raised during trial.
Sh. Mukesh Pal & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Haldiram India Pvt Ltd v. S K Foods and Beverages
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's frivolous application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. alleging fabrication by the plaintiff in civil proceedings, holding that misuse of criminal provisions in civil disputes is an abuse of process.
M/S G.D. GOENKA PVT. LTD. v. SHRI TIKAM CHAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a MoU, without expressing any opinion on the merits.