Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Subhash Chander Sehgal v. The Insurance Ombudsman & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Insurance Ombudsman's order, holding that the petitioner was bound by the clear terms of the annuity policies and no misrepresentation was established.
Ajay Kumar Shaw & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Smt Shakuntala Devi & Anr. v. Central Bank of India
The Delhi High Court upheld a bank employee's transfer order despite his mother's disability, holding that caregiver exemption from transfer is subject to administrative constraints and courts must exercise judicial restraint in service transfers.
Yogender Mandal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend peacefully within the designated zone strictly as per his Certificate of Vending, while permitting him to seek classification as a stationary street vendor from the Town Vending Committee.
Mohd Raj v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a murder case, emphasizing that seriousness of offence alone does not preclude bail when witness testimonies are contradictory and trial is pending.
Vipin & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving robbery with a weapon, holding that serious offences against society cannot be quashed merely on compromise under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Shahnawaj & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Varsha @ Rahul Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder, holding that confessional statements require corroboration and the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against her at the bail stage.
M/S. PECON SOFTWARE LTD. v. MD. MAZHAR
The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte award granting difference of minimum wages to workmen, ruling that due notice and non-appearance justify ex-parte proceedings and limiting High Court interference under Articles 226/227 to jurisdictional or legal errors.
Lalit Kumar v. Sunita
The Delhi High Court disposed of the family court appeal on maintenance by recording the parties' amicable settlement under a Memorandum of Understanding, allowing withdrawal of pending proceedings subject to compliance.
S. Rajadurai v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR for rape on false promise of marriage where both parties were married and had consensual live-in relationship, holding that no prima facie offence under Section 376 IPC was made out.
Rashi Gupta v. Udit Thapar
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by recording a mutual settlement between spouses on maintenance and related claims, directing withdrawal of pending litigations and protecting the husband from third-party complaints related to the matrimonial dispute.
Staff Selection Commission and Ors. v. Namandeep and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing constitution of a new committee to re-examine candidate cases already under police investigation, holding such direction impermissible interference with ongoing criminal proceedings.
STP Limited v. Registrars of Trade Marks
Delhi High Court allowed STP Limited's appeal setting aside the refusal of trademark registration for 'ShaliSBR Latex' where cited similar marks belonged to the same applicant, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders under the Trade Marks Act.
Upinder Kaur Malhotra v. Teghjeet Singh Malhotra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal seeking enhancement of interim maintenance, holding that Rs. 50,000 per month was adequate considering the husband's income and financial liabilities.
Inder Pal Khanna v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner convicted and fined for defacement of property with no pending proceedings cannot have his passport renewal denied on the basis of the FIR, and refused to quash the FIR as no proceedings were pending.
State v. Basir Ahmad
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal upholding acquittal where the prosecutrix's minority was not conclusively proved and material contradictions in prosecution evidence existed.
J D INDUSTRIES INDIA LIMITED v. M/S SAI DRILLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition challenging a deposit order with liberty to raise objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and extended the time for deposit compliance.
Sarvothaman Guhan v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case due to absence of commercial quantity recovery, procedural lapses in search and seizure, delay in sampling, and lack of prima facie evidence of conspiracy.
Deepak Nagiya v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case due to lack of direct recovery, inadmissibility of co-accused disclosure statements, and questionable prosecution credibility amid bribery allegations.