Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Yash v. Directorate of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an unaided school must admit at least 25% disadvantaged group students in entry level classes under the RTE Act and regularized the petitioner's admission accordingly.
Union of India & Ors. v. EX WO Trilochan Pradhan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for hypertension diagnosed after prolonged military service, emphasizing the presumption of attributability and requiring cogent reasons to rebut it.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex JWO Nageshwar Tiwari
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II and Primary Hypertension, reaffirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction over factual findings.
Indus Towers Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the tax department's adjustment of the petitioner's refund against disputed demands beyond the communicated proposal, citing breach of natural justice and statutory mandate under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act.
Vikram Kathuria & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The High Court held that orders under Section 91 Cr.P.C. during investigation are interlocutory and not revisable, and that accused cannot invoke Section 91 before investigation completion and charge framing, setting aside the impugned orders accordingly.
TIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-25(3), NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act are invalid if the specified authority's approval is mechanical and without application of mind, setting aside the reassessment notice and related order.
INSP/GD Dhiraj Bhatt v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and dispose of it within six weeks regarding grant of consequential benefits arising from notional seniority.
Harjinder Singh Chadha v. Indian Council of World Affairs
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of backwages for the period an employee abandoned duty despite an offer of reinstatement, while allowing backwages from the date he reported till actual reinstatement.
M.M.T.C. LTD. v. PRIYANKA OVERSEAS LTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition holding that wilful disobedience of an existing court order is essential and that a deposit direction merged into an arbitral award set aside later cannot form the basis for contempt.
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY & ORS. v. BRYAN PHARMACEUTICALS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. LAXMI KAND PAL / NAVNEET KAND PAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court recorded a confidential settlement between the plaintiffs and Defendants 5 and 9 in a commercial suit, decreed the suit accordingly, and directed further compliance from the Cyber Cell.
Anita v. Amit
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court decree granting divorce on the ground of cruelty, holding that false allegations of extramarital affairs and abuse constitute cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.
GSM Engineering Company v. Paramount Communications Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that factual disputes about the amount due and genuineness of documents must be decided at trial and not at the pre-trial quashing stage.
Dimple Thareja v. Devender Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal against a Family Court decree granting divorce to the husband on grounds of cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Rohit Kumar Jha v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to accused in a cheating case, holding that mere allegations without cogent material do not justify bail cancellation.
Omid Hussain Khil @ Umed Milad v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convict foreign national prisoner to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, holding that gravity of offence alone cannot deny parole and prisoners retain fundamental rights to legal recourse.
Ashok Kumar Gupta Proprietor of Jai Durga Plaster Industries & Anr. v. Arif Khan
The Delhi High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark "SIKARNI" for Wall Putty, finding a prima facie case of trademark infringement against the plaintiffs' registered mark "SAKARNI".
Disha A. Ravi v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the bail condition requiring prior court permission before foreign travel as a reasonable restriction on the fundamental right under Article 21, balancing individual liberty with the State’s interest in a fair investigation.
Mahalaxmi Exports v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s GST refund claim by excluding the COVID-19 pandemic period from the limitation under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act, directing the authorities to process the refund with interest.
Dr. Shashi Vashisht v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of excess Transport Allowance from gratuity of a retired employee who retired within one year of the recovery order is impermissible without an undertaking, setting aside the CAT order and directing refund.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Security Printing and Mining Corporation of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s deletion of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction based on scrutiny of accounts before invoking Rule 8D.