Delhi High Court
34,294 judgments
Shagun v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging framing of charges under Section 201 IPC, holding that prima facie material existed to proceed against the petitioner and that the question of knowledge would be tested at trial.
Union of India v. Dr. Shailja Saxena
The Delhi High Court allowed review petitions and held that medical officers absorbed under Rule 8 of the Central Health Service Rules are entitled to service benefits, recalling its earlier judgment favoring the Union of India.
Sudershan Kumar Bhayana v. Vinod Seth
The Delhi High Court set aside the Single Judge’s modification of an arbitral award, holding that courts cannot modify awards under Section 34 and that damages based on a penalty clause without proof of loss are unsustainable.
Dr. Renuka Bulani Prasad v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a candidate who failed to register for DNB Post Diploma counseling within the prescribed period, holding that non-compliance with clear procedural requirements precludes admission despite merit.
GD Arun Kumar v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking eligibility to appear in the CISF Limited Departmental Competitive Examination, holding that the petitioner did not fulfill the mandatory four years of regular service as Sub Inspector as on the cut-off date.
Union of India and Anr. v. Yogesh Kumar Bangia
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing reconsideration of promotion by ignoring non-communicated below benchmark ACRs, affirming that such adverse entries cannot be considered for promotion.
Yash v. Directorate of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an unaided school must admit at least 25% disadvantaged group students in entry level classes under the RTE Act and regularized the petitioner's admission accordingly.
Union of India & Ors. v. EX WO Trilochan Pradhan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for hypertension diagnosed after prolonged military service, emphasizing the presumption of attributability and requiring cogent reasons to rebut it.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex JWO Nageshwar Tiwari
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II and Primary Hypertension, reaffirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction over factual findings.
Indus Towers Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the tax department's adjustment of the petitioner's refund against disputed demands beyond the communicated proposal, citing breach of natural justice and statutory mandate under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act.
Vikram Kathuria & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The High Court held that orders under Section 91 Cr.P.C. during investigation are interlocutory and not revisable, and that accused cannot invoke Section 91 before investigation completion and charge framing, setting aside the impugned orders accordingly.
TIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-25(3), NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act are invalid if the specified authority's approval is mechanical and without application of mind, setting aside the reassessment notice and related order.
INSP/GD Dhiraj Bhatt v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and dispose of it within six weeks regarding grant of consequential benefits arising from notional seniority.
Harjinder Singh Chadha v. Indian Council of World Affairs
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of backwages for the period an employee abandoned duty despite an offer of reinstatement, while allowing backwages from the date he reported till actual reinstatement.
M.M.T.C. LTD. v. PRIYANKA OVERSEAS LTD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition holding that wilful disobedience of an existing court order is essential and that a deposit direction merged into an arbitral award set aside later cannot form the basis for contempt.
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY & ORS. v. BRYAN PHARMACEUTICALS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. LAXMI KAND PAL / NAVNEET KAND PAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court recorded a confidential settlement between the plaintiffs and Defendants 5 and 9 in a commercial suit, decreed the suit accordingly, and directed further compliance from the Cyber Cell.
Anita v. Amit
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court decree granting divorce on the ground of cruelty, holding that false allegations of extramarital affairs and abuse constitute cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.
GSM Engineering Company v. Paramount Communications Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that factual disputes about the amount due and genuineness of documents must be decided at trial and not at the pre-trial quashing stage.
Dimple Thareja v. Devender Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal against a Family Court decree granting divorce to the husband on grounds of cruelty and desertion under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Rohit Kumar Jha v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to accused in a cheating case, holding that mere allegations without cogent material do not justify bail cancellation.