Delhi High Court
34,293 judgments
VBM Medizintechnik GmbH v. Geetan Luthra
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant's registration and use of the "VBM" mark infringed the plaintiff's prior rights and passing off, rejecting acquiescence defense and granting interim relief to the plaintiff.
Sh. Vinod Aggarwal & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 304A and 287 IPC on the basis of settlement and compensation paid to the deceased's heirs, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Parmod Kumar & Anr. v. Parveen Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed second appeals challenging a decree for specific performance, holding that admitted written agreements cannot be contradicted by oral evidence and that no substantial question of law arose for interference.
Staff Selection Commission v. Vivek Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing constitution of a fresh Committee to re-examine candidate cases amid ongoing criminal investigations, holding that such parallel inquiry is impermissible.
Omkar Singh v. Savita Kunwar & Ors.
The court held that the registered owner of a vehicle at the time of an accident remains liable to pay compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, despite any unregistered sale prior to the accident.
Dr. Kiran Gupta v. The University of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the University of Delhi's review petition and upheld the direction to grant Dr. Kiran Gupta promotion to Professor from her date of eligibility, May 8, 2009, emphasizing that prior non-selection does not preclude backdating promotion under UGC regulations.
Vinod Kumar v. G.N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that while an employee acquitted after conviction is not entitled to back wages for suspension period, he must be paid subsistence allowance and granted seniority and promotion benefits for that period.
Deepak Verma v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354A/354D/506/509 IPC based on a mutual settlement between parties, emphasizing the Court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in private offences.
Tool Tech Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration due to defective notice and procedural irregularities, directing restoration of registration.
Nilabh Ranjan v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of ex-LL.B. students seeking permission to appear in a second semester backlog examination after exhausting their permitted attempts under the University prospectus.
Dharambir & Anr. v. Late Sh Avdesh (Deceased) Thr. Lrs.
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, dismissing the appellants' delayed appeal and confirming strict liability without proof of negligence.
Nipun Mehra & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties, reaffirming the High Court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash non-compoundable offences in matrimonial cases to secure ends of justice.
Union of India v. Kiran Kanojia
The Delhi High Court emphasized the urgent need for the government to implement a comprehensive litigation policy to curb frivolous litigation while respecting the executive's policy-making domain.
Sh. Sachin Upadhyay v. The Additional Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax, Appeals-I, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration and related orders for failure to specify reasons in the show cause notice and violation of natural justice.
Dhiru Builders and Promoters Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, holding that further enquiry by the Assessing Officer is warranted and directing disclosure of material information to the assessee.
Kundan Lal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to permit the petitioner to vend within the designated zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and its terms, without obstruction.
Suresh Kumar Soni v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to permit the petitioner to vend within the permitted zone strictly in accordance with the terms of his Certificate of Vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Shazad Khan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to permit the petitioner to vend within the permitted zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and applicable law.
Rakesh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within the designated zone strictly in accordance with the terms of his Certificate of Vending issued under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Deepak Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted habeas corpus relief for Mansi Tyagi held unlawfully but denied it for Sandeep Kumar who was in lawful judicial custody under a criminal FIR.