Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Commissioner of Customs v. M/S M.D. Overseas
The Delhi High Court upheld the CESTAT's allowance of amendments under Section 149 of the Customs Act to add declarations for Service Tax Rebate in shipping bills, dismissing the Customs Department's appeals.
CT GD Raju Kore v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a detailed representation against a show cause notice for termination on medical grounds and directed the respondents to consider it before taking any adverse action.
CT GD Mukesh Kumar Mishra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a detailed representation against a show cause notice for termination on medical grounds and directed the respondents to consider it before taking any adverse action.
Nnova and Company v. Ramesh Kumar Raheja and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the registration of the "NOBA" trademark obtained in breach of a prior consent decree and directed rectification of the trademark register under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
S. Ragunathan v. Munna Lal; S. Ragunathan v. Raghu Raj Kumar
Appeals under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act are not maintainable if contempt jurisdiction is not exercised; appeals dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other remedies.
Amith A. Dumra v. Preeti Dumra
The Delhi High Court held that requiring deposit of maintenance arrears as a precondition to hearing an appeal under the DV Act is impermissible and directed the appellate court to decide the appeal on merits.
Madhvi & Ors v. Irshad & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claimants' appeal to enhance compensation by factoring in future prospects of income increase as per the Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi judgment, while disallowing loss of love and affection claims under the same principles.
Angika Development Society v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of forum non conveniens, holding that the Patna High Court is the appropriate forum as the major cause of action arose there.
Gala International Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act for adjudicating show cause notices is mandatory, and adjudication after a delay of over fourteen years is barred, setting aside the resumption of proceedings.
G R Builders v. M/S Metro Speciality Hospitals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the seat of arbitration fixed at Faridabad confers exclusive jurisdiction on courts there.
Shatrunjay v. Avinash Gulati
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's suit for injunction and possession due to lack of documentary proof and the tenant's minority at tenancy inception, holding that an oral tenancy by a minor is void and prolonged loss of possession renders the suit infructuous.
Vikram Kathuriya v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a sexual exploitation case involving alleged concealment of prior marriage, holding that disputed facts require trial and custodial interrogation was unnecessary.
Mahalaxmi Exports v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s refund claim by excluding the COVID-19 period from the limitation under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act, setting aside orders rejecting the refund as time-barred.
Prem Sikri v. Prakhar Prabhat Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of delayed applications to amend leave to defend and place additional documents in an eviction proceeding, emphasizing the sanctity of the 15-day statutory period and the need for material impact of subsequent events.
Jaswant Singh Basetia v. Umesh Chaudhary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed impleading legal representatives of deceased defendants without a separate application for setting aside abatement and directed proper service on untraceable defendants, permitting the trial court to hear pending applications independently.
Tirpat Singh Bansal v. Jagwant Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim custody order granting custody of a minor girl child below five years to the mother, emphasizing the child's welfare as paramount and modifying visitation rights for the father.
Sulav Adhikari v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications in a cybercrime case involving alleged large-scale online cheating through sale of a banned product, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and the serious societal impact of such scams.
Medicover Holding (Cyprus) Limited & Ors. v. Medicover Hospital and Health Care Centre & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte injunction restraining defendants from using the 'MEDICOVER' mark and logo, holding that their identical use constituted trademark infringement and passing off against the plaintiffs' registered marks.
Siddhartha Mukherjee v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld HPCL's salary deductions for the appellant's unauthorized absence following reassignment, affirming the 'no work no pay' principle under applicable service rules and the Payment of Wages Act.
Canara Bank v. M/S Soma Engineering
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Article 227, permitting Canara Bank to place additional documents before the Trial Court and directed the Trial Court to consider them afresh and grant a fair hearing to both parties.