Delhi High Court

101,749 judgments

Year:

M/S HUAWEI TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) COMPANY PVT. LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, DELHI & ANR

30 Mar 2026 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2026:DHC:2563-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed time-barred reassessment notices and special audit directions issued without jurisdiction or proper application of mind, affirming strict compliance with statutory conditions under the Income-tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income-tax Act, 1961 Section 142(2A) Section 148 Section 149

Ajit Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors

30 Mar 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:2650-DB
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed as premature a writ petition challenging ICC findings and GSFC disciplinary proceedings against a BSF officer pending final confirmation of the GSFC order.

administrative petition_dismissed Internal Complaints Committee Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act General Security Force Court Border Security Force Act

Barinder Kaur v. Directorate of Enforcement

30 Mar 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:2667

Anticipatory bail under PMLA requires satisfying twin conditions of non-guilt and no likelihood of offence on bail, and evasive conduct or obstruction during investigation disentitles the accused from such relief.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA custodial interrogation

Union of India and Others v. Lt Col Ajay Kumar Retd

30 Mar 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:2684-DB
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming that the burden to prove non-attributability lies on the military and emphasizing the necessity of reasoned medical opinions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Entitlement Rules 2008 Neither Attributable Nor Aggravated (NANA)

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Subodh Jaiswal

30 Mar 2026 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Ajay Digpaul · 2026:DHC:2756-DB

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurance company's appeal by reducing the awarded insurance amount to the sum insured while maintaining compensation for mental agony and condoning delay subject to costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Personal Protect Insurance Policy sum insured ex-parte decree condonation of delay

Kamlesh v. Delhi Development Authority

30 Mar 2026 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tejas Karia · 2026:DHC:2800-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that failure to inform the authority of change of address or death and unexplained delay disentitles legal heirs from claiming allotment of a plot.

property appeal_dismissed allotment Delhi Development Authority demand-cum-allotment letter change of address

Shakil Ahmad & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

30 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2747

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a family dispute after the parties amicably settled through mediation, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR mediation Section 528 BNSS 2023 private dispute

Prateek Bahuguna & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

30 Mar 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:2746

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the married parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute compromise

Kumar Manish v. Onicra Credit Rating Agency of India Limited

28 Mar 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:2616-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the District Court at Dwarka had territorial jurisdiction to entertain the Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award despite the arbitral proceedings being held at DIAC, setting aside the order dismissing the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 20 CPC arbitral award challenge

Ranjeeta Balmiki v. National Information Centre Services Incorporated & Ors.

28 Mar 2026 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2026:DHC:2765

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction cannot enforce contractual employment obligations against a private company, dismissing the petition and directing the petitioner to seek civil remedies.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant writ of mandamus contractual employment private company Article 226

Union Bank of India v. Delhi Jal Board

28 Mar 2026 · Amit Bansal · 2026:DHC:2593
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition by a secured creditor challenging termination of a contract, holding that the creditor lacked locus to take over the borrower's business and that contract termination complied with contractual and natural justice requirements.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant secured creditor Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code SARFAESI Act termination of contract

Mohan Babu Gupta v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

28 Mar 2026 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2026:DHC:2604

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case due to procedural lapses in search and arrest authorization and prolonged trial delay violating the right to speedy trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 41 authorization Section 42 search after sunset grounds of belief

UEM India Pvt. Ltd. v. ONGC Limited

28 Mar 2026 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2026:DHC:2574
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award portion granting damages equivalent to the Performance Bank Guarantee over liquidated damages for lack of proper reasoning and proof of loss, while upholding other parts of the award.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Performance Bank Guarantee Liquidated Damages

Ram Nath v. M/S Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

28 Mar 2026 · Shail Jain · 2026:DHC:2594
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that claims involving disputed entitlement cannot be adjudicated under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which is limited to computation of pre-existing rights, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court's refusal to entertain such a claim.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act Labour Court jurisdiction disputed entitlement execution proceedings

BOMBAY METALS (P) LIMITED v. TARA SINGH

28 Mar 2026 · Tejas Karia · 2026:DHC:2596

The Delhi High Court held that the respondent's copyright registrations for packaging were colourable imitations lacking originality and ordered their cancellation under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 Section 50 Artistic work originality Colourable imitation

Rajender Kumar Aggarwal v. Bhimsen Sharma

28 Mar 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:2611

The Delhi High Court upheld possession decree under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in favor of a co-owner landlord against tenant, rejecting procedural and jurisdictional objections.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC co-owner locus standi Delhi Rent Control Act Section 50 DRC Act

Sandha Global Information Technology Pvt Ltd v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

28 Mar 2026 · Prateek Jalan · 2026:DHC:2615
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 289/125(a) BNS on the basis of an amicable settlement and absence of gross negligence, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant inherent jurisdiction quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS gross negligence

Deepika @ Deepa v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Mar 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:2613

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in an illegal adoption case due to prolonged custody, incomplete trial, and lack of prosecution objection.

criminal bail_granted bail illegal adoption Section 370 IPC prolonged custody

SAGA LIFESCIENCES LIMITED v. M/S ANAADI GLOBAL CO. & ANR.

28 Mar 2026 · Tejas Karia · 2026:DHC:2600

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar mark 'HALESAGA' for pharmaceutical products, recognizing plaintiff's prior use and goodwill under the 'SAGA' trademark.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Interim injunction Deceptive similarity

Amit v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

28 Mar 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:2612

Bail granted to accused in serious offence due to prosecution's delay in completing witness examination, subject to conditions preventing witness interference.

criminal appeal_allowed bail delay in trial prosecution witnesses hostile witnesses