Delhi High Court

27,673 judgments

Year:

Oshin Suresh Upadhyay v. Kumar Gaurav Dubey

30 Jan 2026 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:3129-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed modification of a prior judgment to correct a factual error regarding the appellant's employment status without affecting the case outcome.

other other Procedural modification of judgment correction of factual error clerical error judicial corrigendum

Sh. Surender Pal Giri v. Shri Raj Kumar & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging the dismissal of applications to set aside an ex parte decree, holding that summons service and authorization of counsel were valid and the appellants' non-service plea was unsustainable.

civil appeal_dismissed Order IX Rule 13 CPC ex parte decree service of summons General Power of Attorney

Tirthankar v. Union of India and Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:766-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to reserve a vacancy in the NDA 156 Course for the petitioner to be admitted after recovery from a medically recognized healing period, ensuring fairness in admission despite temporary medical unfitness.

administrative petition_allowed Significant National Defence Academy medical fitness laparoscopic hernioplasty healing period

Jagdish Singh Chauhan v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:1021
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition against its earlier dismissal of a writ petition, reaffirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction and the inadmissibility of re-litigating settled issues under Article 226.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Review Petition Article 226 Writ Petition Scope of Review

Aloke Steels Industries Private Limited v. Aditya Birla Global Trading India Pvt Ltd

30 Jan 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:744-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding actual damages beyond a contractual cap, holding that a plea of capped damages not raised before the Arbitrator cannot be raised in a Section 34 petition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Liquidated damages Earnest Money Deposit (EMD)

Union of India & Ors. v. JWO Brijesh Singh Panwar (Retd.)

30 Jan 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2026:DHC:746-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of disability pension to a retired armed forces officer, holding that under the Entitlement Rules, 2008, the military establishment bears the burden to prove non-attributability of disability and unreasoned medical opinions are insufficient to deny pension.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Entitlement Rules 2008 Release Medical Board attributability

Aparna Mutatkar & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi

30 Jan 2026 · Vikas Mahajan · 2026:DHC:1035

The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration to sole beneficiaries under a duly proved Will, exempting them from furnishing surety bonds in an uncontested petition.

civil petition_allowed Significant Indian Succession Act letters of administration Will proof attesting witnesses

Pawan Sachdeva v. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 19(3), Delhi & Anr.

30 Jan 2026 · Dinesh Mehta; Vinod Kumar · 2026:DHC:908-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that issuance of a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act within limitation is valid despite an inadvertent attachment error and service after limitation does not vitiate reassessment proceedings under the pre-amendment regime.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Notice issuance vs service Limitation period Reassessment proceedings

Banwari Lal & Anr. v. Raj Kumar & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2026:DHC:1180
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Commissioner’s order holding the principal employer liable to pay compensation and penalty under Section 12 of the Employee’s Compensation Act, dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial question of law.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 Section 12 principal employer liability immediate employer

Rekha Devi & Anr. v. Bechan Yadav & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:805
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim involving a deceased minor by applying a multiplier of 18 for loss of dependency, aligning with recent Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency multiplier minor victim motor accident claim

M/S VPSSR FACILITIES v. Union of India

30 Jan 2026 · Amit Bansal · 2026:DHC:901

The Delhi High Court held that debarment from government tenders without a prior show cause notice indicating the intention to blacklist violates natural justice and quashed the debarment order against the petitioner.

administrative petition_allowed Significant blacklisting debarment show cause notice natural justice

Manila Kundara v. Ajay Goyal

30 Jan 2026 · Swarana Kanta Sharma

The High Court upheld convictions under Section 138 NI Act, holding that a sole proprietor can maintain a complaint for cheques issued in the trade name, and the accused failed to rebut statutory presumptions of liability.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act locus standi sole proprietorship statutory presumption

Mrs. Ajit Inder Singh v. Mr. Simranjit Singh Grewal

30 Jan 2026 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2026:DHC:845
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a Hindu female's limited interest granted in recognition of a pre-existing right of maintenance enlarges into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, allowing her to maintain a suit for partition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 14 life estate absolute ownership

Sachin Gupta & Ors. v. Registrar Cooperative Society & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Prathiba M. Singh; Madhu Jain · 2026:DHC:788-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that multiple expelled cooperative society members can file a common appeal, directed expeditious hearing of their appeals by the Cooperative Tribunal, and maintained interim status quo on membership pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Cooperative Society Expulsion of members Common appeal Delhi Cooperative Tribunal

Tauseif Khan v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

30 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:747

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that bail is not warranted at an advanced trial stage with credible eyewitness evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony

Gorkha Security Services v. Directorate of Health Services

30 Jan 2026 · Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 8104
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award's rejection of interest and costs for lack of intelligible reasoning, remanding that claim for fresh consideration while upholding the rest of the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Reasoned Award Public Policy of India

Amol Kaur v. State of Delhi

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:803

The High Court directed the Trial Court to reconsider the application under Section 302 CrPC for legal representatives of a deceased complainant to continue prosecution, emphasizing proper legal procedure and hearing.

criminal other Procedural Section 302 CrPC legal representatives prosecution continuation Trial Court discretion

Naveen v. Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence

30 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:755

The Delhi High Court held that summons under Section 70 CGST Act are inquiry tools, not proceedings, and dismissed the petition challenging their validity as premature, emphasizing adherence to procedural safeguards and cooperation during GST investigations.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 70 CGST Act Summons validity GST investigation Anticipatory bail

Manish & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:799

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a matrimonial compromise and the complainant's consent, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC Section 406 IPC

Sandhya Gupta v. Shri Ganesh Traders

30 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court held that a director who validly resigned before cheque issuance cannot be held liable under Section 138 NI Act, quashing summons against Abhishek Gupta while upholding summons against Sandhya Gupta as an active director.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act director liability resignation of director Section 168 Companies Act