Delhi High Court

101,749 judgments

Year:

Zimmer India Private Limited v. Pinnacle

12 Sep 2026 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5859

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon the respondent's failure to respond to arbitration notice, following the Supreme Court's limited scope principle.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration agreement

Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Mrs Usha Tyagi & Ors

07 Sep 2026 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6490-DB

The Delhi High Court held that only employees of recognized private schools have the statutory right to approach the Delhi School Education Tribunal, and employees of unrecognized unaided schools do not fall within its jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 recognized school unrecognized school Delhi School Education Tribunal

Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Mrs Usha Tyagi & Ors

07 Sep 2026 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6489-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Delhi School Education Tribunal has jurisdiction only over employees of recognized schools and not over employees of unrecognized unaided schools under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 recognized school unrecognized school Delhi School Education Tribunal

Shaheed Udham Singh Smarak Shiksha Samiti v. Mrs Usha Tyagi & Ors

07 Sep 2026 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:6492-DB

The Delhi High Court held that only employees of recognized private schools have the statutory right to approach the Delhi School Education Tribunal, and this right does not extend to employees of unrecognized unaided schools.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 recognized school unrecognized school Delhi School Education Tribunal

Adani Enterprises Limited v. State Trading Corporation of India & Anr.

02 Sep 2026 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6821
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court disposed of the execution petition enforcing an arbitral award after the parties entered into a valid and binding settlement agreement resolving all disputes.

civil appeal_dismissed Settlement Agreement Arbitral Award Execution Petition Discharge of Claims

Indian Council for Agricultural Research v. Pramod Nischal

27 Aug 2026 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:376-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing reimbursement of actual medical expenses for emergency hip replacement surgery under CGHS, rejecting limitation to CGHS rates.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Central Government Health Scheme CGHS rates reimbursement emergency surgery

Prem Bahadur @ Bhoj Bahadur v. State

23 Jul 2026 · C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:3513
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor, affirming the reliability of the child victim's testimony and the applicability of the POCSO Act and IPC provisions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant penetrative sexual assault POCSO Act child witness Section 376(2)(i) IPC

Dharambir v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Jul 2026 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:818-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of a BSF constable challenging his absconder declaration and upheld the departmental disciplinary actions for repeated unauthorized absences.

administrative petition_dismissed absconder unauthorized absence Border Security Force Act Section 19(a)

Appellant-in-person v. STATE AND ANR

16 Jul 2026 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV O R D E R; 16.07.2026 · 2026:DHC:5675

Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. Union of India

06 Jun 2026 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8137-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Look Out Circulars issued by NCB-India pursuant to INTERPOL Red Corner Notices, dismissing challenges to their legality and clarifying that Indian courts do not examine the merits of foreign criminal proceedings in such cases.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Look Out Circular INTERPOL Red Corner Notice National Central Bureau CBI

JCB India Limited & Anr. v. The Competition Commission of India & Anr.

02 Jun 2026 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma

The Delhi High Court quashed the CCI's investigation order into alleged abuse of dominance through design infringement litigation after the parties settled the dispute, emphasizing the sanctity and finality of mediation and settlements.

competition petition_allowed Significant Competition Commission of India Section 26(1) Competition Act Abuse of dominant position Sham litigation

Satya Developers Pvt Ltd v. Pearey Lal Bhawan Association

01 Jun 2026 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:8604-DB

The Delhi High Court held that service tax on rent is an indirect tax borne by the lessee unless the lease contract expressly shifts the burden to the lessor, dismissing appeals challenging liability to pay service tax under lease agreements.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant service tax lease agreement indirect tax value added tax

Satya Developers Pvt Ltd v. Pearey Lal Bhawan Association

01 Jun 2026 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:8603-DB

The Delhi High Court held that service tax on rent is an indirect tax borne by the lessee unless the lease contract expressly provides otherwise, dismissing appeals challenging liability to pay service tax introduced after execution of lease agreements.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax lease agreement indirect tax contractual interpretation

Satya Developers Pvt Ltd v. Pearey Lal Bhawan Association

01 Jun 2026 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:8606-DB

The Delhi High Court held that service tax on rent is an indirect tax borne by the lessee unless the lease contract expressly provides otherwise, dismissing appeals by lessors denying such liability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant service tax indirect tax lease agreement contractual interpretation

Through: Mr. R. K. Handoo, Advocate v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL) -II

24 Apr 2026 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA; HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD... · 2026:DHC:3410-DB

Parsvnath Developers Limited v. Vikram Khosla

01 Apr 2026 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:812

The Delhi High Court granted ex-parte decree for recovery of possession and outstanding dues under a Sub Licence Agreement where the defendant defaulted on payments and failed to vacate premises post-termination.

civil appeal_allowed Sub Licence Agreement ex-parte decree mesne profits possession recovery

KSR Brothers v. IGNOU

01 Apr 2026 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2021:DHC:3695
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding the petitioner’s claims ex facie barred by limitation and refusing to compel arbitration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Limitation Acknowledgment of debt

Pooja v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

30 Mar 2026 · Jasmeet Singh · 2026:DHC:3049

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging mop-up round admissions, holding that candidates who withdrew earlier admissions are eligible for mop-up counseling and that delayed admission claims beyond the academic year are impermissible.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Post Graduate Ayurveda Admission Mop-up Round Eligibility Counseling Notice Interpretation Withdrawal of Admission

BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. HEERA DEVI & ANR

30 Mar 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2026:DHC:2993

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded under the Employees’ Compensation Act for injuries causing loss of earning capacity, ruling that absence of direct medical nexus to death or formal disability certificate does not bar the claim.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 compensation loss of earning capacity causal nexus

INDUSIND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. ROSHAN KUMAR SAHU & ORS

30 Mar 2026 · Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:2690

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's award holding the negligent driver liable for the accident and affirmed the compensation including 90% permanent disability and attendant charges.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence contributory negligence permanent disability