Delhi High Court

27,673 judgments

Year:

Neelam Bhatia and Ors. v. Ritu Bhatia and Ors.

29 Jan 2026 · Amit Bansal · 2026:DHC:698

The Delhi High Court rejected the plaint seeking partition and declaration of title based on an Agreement to Sell and Power of Attorney, holding that only a registered sale deed confers valid title and the suit was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Agreement to Sell General Power of Attorney Registered Sale Deed Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Renu Mathur v. Ramesh Chander Gupta

29 Jan 2026 · Amit Bansal · 2026:DHC:700

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for recovery of Rs. 50 lakhs based on valid promissory notes and cheques, granted pendente lite interest and costs, and dismissed the defendants' appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant promissory notes undated cheques loan recovery pendente lite interest

State of NCT of Delhi v. Bhagat; Ashwani Kumar @ Kaka; Rambir

29 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:714

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused persons in a kidnapping and robbery case due to lack of credible evidence and unreliable identification.

criminal appeal_dismissed kidnapping stupefying substance robbery identification parade

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MUKESH KUMAR AND ORS

29 Jan 2026 · Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:756
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the multiplier of 18 for calculating compensation in fatal accident claims involving minors below 15 years, dismissing the insurance company's appeal for reduction to 15.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant multiplier minor deceased motor vehicle accident loss of dependency

Amit Aggarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement

29 Jan 2026 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2026:DHC:720
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Amit Aggarwal in a money laundering case, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention without trial violates Article 21 when investigation is complete and evidence of proceeds of crime is prima facie lacking.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA regular bail proceeds of crime

Romesh Sharma v. The State

29 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:710

The High Court discharged the accused due to vitiated investigation by the complainant officer and absence of prima facie evidence of conspiracy, holding that unreliable tape-recorded evidence without corroboration cannot sustain charges under Section 120B and 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy Section 120B IPC tape-recorded evidence investigation impartiality

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. NARESH CHANDER & ORS

29 Jan 2026 · Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:683

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award computing the deceased's cumulative income from two part-time jobs for compensation, emphasizing the relaxed evidentiary standards in motor accident claims and dismissing the Insurance Company's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal loss of dependency salary certificate

GBL Chemicals Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi

29 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging summoning orders under Section 138/141 NI Act, holding directors vicariously liable despite alleged fraud by a resigned director, and emphasizing that factual defenses require trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability of directors summoning order

Shyam Rastogi Trading as Shyam Hosiery Industries and Anr. v. Hugo Boss Trade Mark Management GmbH and Co KG and Anr.

29 Jan 2026 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2026:DHC:703

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of belatedly filed documents for lack of reasonable cause and procedural non-compliance in a trademark prior user dispute under Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC as applicable to Commercial Courts.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC reasonable cause prior user trademark BIG BOSS

Ankit Jaiswal v. The State of NCT of Delhi

29 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:707

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a POCSO case due to the prosecutrix's near-majority age, lack of medical evidence, and her failure to support the prosecution at trial.

criminal appeal_allowed bail POCSO Act sexual offence prosecutrix age

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Smt Princy Misra & Ors

29 Jan 2026 · Prateek Jalan · 2026:DHC:706
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by recalculating income and future prospects considering probationary employment, upheld interest from claim filing date, and adjusted non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency future prospects motor accident compensation probationary employee

Inderjeet v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

29 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:705

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO and IPC rape case considering inconsistent prosecutrix statements, prior marriage, and the accused's role in initiating proceedings against her father.

criminal appeal_allowed bail POCSO Act rape prosecutrix

Mohd Affan v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

29 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:712

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a mobile phone snatching case after he joined the investigation despite initial apprehension of arrest.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail mobile phone snatching Section 303(2) BNS investigation

Priyanka Sharma & Ors. v. Union of India

29 Jan 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2026:DHC:730
Cites 4 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the family of a deceased railway passenger who fell from a moving train, holding that the Railways are strictly liable under the Railways Act despite delays in ticket production and body recovery.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act 1989 strict liability untoward incident bona fide passenger

United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Dhiraj Trehan; United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Geeta Trehan

29 Jan 2026 · Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:687
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that occupants injured in an insured vehicle are entitled to compensation under a comprehensive insurance policy, even if they are legal heirs of the deceased insured owner/driver, dismissing the insurer's appeal challenging liability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 comprehensive insurance policy third-party liability occupants coverage

Vijay Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)

29 Jan 2026 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2026:DHC:731

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a bail application solely on grounds of its volume, holding that courts must consider bail applications on merits and afford a meaningful hearing, especially when constitutional issues are raised.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail application dismissal on voluminous grounds audi alteram partem Article 22(1) Constitution

Ravi Kumar v. State

29 Jan 2026 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2026:DHC:732

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rape and kidnapping based on credible prosecutrix testimony and forensic evidence, while reducing the sentence considering the appellant's circumstances and pre-2013 law.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC Section 366 IPC prosecutrix testimony

Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Private Limited v. Atharva Hotel Superfluitities India Pvt. Ltd.

29 Jan 2026 · Mini Pushkarna · 2026:DHC:713

The Delhi High Court held that invocation of arbitration under a lease deed's arbitration clause is not premature despite non-exhaustion of pre-arbitral negotiation and conciliation, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration Act arbitration agreement pre-arbitral mechanism conciliation

Bhoop Singh v. State C.B.I.

29 Jan 2026 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2026:DHC:763
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a police officer for demanding and accepting bribe, affirming that minor discrepancies and procedural lapses do not vitiate a well-established prosecution case under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 demand and acceptance of bribe Section 20 PC Act presumption Section 232 CrPC non-compliance

Bharti Axa General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rajender @ Bunty

29 Jan 2026 · Anish Dayal

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reassessing functional disability and upholding non-pecuniary damages based on claimant's occupation and permanent injury.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability functional disability non-pecuniary damages