Delhi High Court
101,749 judgments
Heena Aleem v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the requirement of Fire NOC for coaching centers and dismissed writ petitions challenging MCD's levy of conversion and penalty charges after due process and hearing.
Communication Components Antenna Inc v. Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik GmbH & Co. KG
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity and infringement of Indian Patent No. 240893 relating to asymmetrical split-sector antennas, granting permanent injunction and damages against Rosenberger Group defendants.
GORAYA STRAW BOARD MILLS PVT. LTD. v. SHRI GANESH PAPER TRADING CO.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's order closing the defendant's evidence after granting sufficient opportunities, holding that repeated adjournments justified closure of evidence.
Putzmeister Concrete Pumps GmbH and Anr v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that ex-post facto approval for foreign investment under Press Note-1 (2005 Series) is a policy decision with limited judicial interference and found no violation of natural justice in the approval process, allowing the intra-Court appeal.
Paramjeet Singh v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's dismissal of a contract laborer's claim, holding that the petitioner was not an employee of the principal employer and failed to prove continuous service required for protection against termination.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. M/S Kapoor Diesels Garage Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the decree directing the insurer to pay the claim, holding that a booklet driving licence valid on the accident date cannot be deemed fake merely for not being converted to a smart card before the deadline.
Jaina Marketing and Associates v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interest on refund of excess customs duty is payable only if refund is delayed beyond three months from the refund application date, dismissing claims for interest where refunds were granted within statutory timelines.
INTERTEK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside BHEL's debarment and GeM's suspension orders against Intertek India Pvt. Ltd. for lack of reasoned consideration and violation of natural justice, emphasizing the need for speaking orders and proportionality in public procurement penalties.
Angrej Chaudhary @ Pujari Singh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case due to weak and unsubstantiated prosecution evidence, emphasizing the right to liberty pending trial.
Rahul Pandey v. Badarpur Service Station
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s finding that the petitioner voluntarily abandoned service by prolonged absence without satisfactory explanation, dismissing his claim of illegal termination and reinstatement.
Suresh Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on compromise and reconciliation between the parties.
Division Railway Manager & Ors. v. Rishi Hitkari
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's jurisdiction under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act to adjudicate and award unpaid salary and interest based on pre-existing service conditions despite employer's denial.
Sanjay Mehra v. Sharad Mehra & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that exclusive trademark rights under a family settlement prohibit use of the mark SUPERON in India by one party except for limited export purposes, requiring geo-blocking of websites and prohibiting interlinking of trademarks, and found both parties in wilful contempt for violations.
K.S. OILS LIMITED v. SHIVANG EDIBLES OILS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte injunction restraining use of the trademark 'KALASH', holding that the Trial Court erred in not considering the appellant's prior proprietary rights and statutory registrations before granting interim relief.
M/S TULLIO GIUSI SRL v. GLOSSY BUTTONS PVT. LTD.
The High Court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to lead rebuttal evidence despite procedural lapses, emphasizing the interest of justice over strict procedural compliance.
International Visa Services Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of IVS Lanka from a tender, holding that it cannot claim contractual experience of IVS Global without formal assignment, affirming strict construction of eligibility criteria and limited judicial interference in tender matters.
Sudha Devi v. Anil Kumar
The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint and summoning order against a non-drawer petitioner under Section 138 NI Act, holding that only the drawer/signatory of the cheque can be prosecuted.
Sapna Thakur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC against the petitioner's vague and unspecific allegations, holding that such allegations amount to abuse of the legal process.
Feroz Khan and Ors. v. Anil Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the decree for recovery of money based on invoices and input tax credit availed, applying the doctrine of approbate and reprobate and clarifying evidentiary standards in commercial supply disputes.
JK Infrastructure v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the MCD's municipal waste management tender, holding that the petitioner lacked locus and that judicial interference in bona fide public tenders is limited.