Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Mrs. Ajit Inder Singh v. Mr. Simranjit Singh Grewal

30 Jan 2026 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2026:DHC:845
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a Hindu female's limited interest granted in recognition of a pre-existing right of maintenance enlarges into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, allowing her to maintain a suit for partition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 14 life estate absolute ownership

Sachin Gupta & Ors. v. Registrar Cooperative Society & Ors.

30 Jan 2026 · Prathiba M. Singh; Madhu Jain · 2026:DHC:788-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that multiple expelled cooperative society members can file a common appeal, directed expeditious hearing of their appeals by the Cooperative Tribunal, and maintained interim status quo on membership pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Cooperative Society Expulsion of members Common appeal Delhi Cooperative Tribunal

Tauseif Khan v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

30 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:747

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that bail is not warranted at an advanced trial stage with credible eyewitness evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony

Gorkha Security Services v. Directorate of Health Services

30 Jan 2026 · Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 8104
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award's rejection of interest and costs for lack of intelligible reasoning, remanding that claim for fresh consideration while upholding the rest of the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Reasoned Award Public Policy of India

Amol Kaur v. State of Delhi

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:803

The High Court directed the Trial Court to reconsider the application under Section 302 CrPC for legal representatives of a deceased complainant to continue prosecution, emphasizing proper legal procedure and hearing.

criminal other Procedural Section 302 CrPC legal representatives prosecution continuation Trial Court discretion

Naveen v. Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence

30 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:755

The Delhi High Court held that summons under Section 70 CGST Act are inquiry tools, not proceedings, and dismissed the petition challenging their validity as premature, emphasizing adherence to procedural safeguards and cooperation during GST investigations.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 70 CGST Act Summons validity GST investigation Anticipatory bail

Manish & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:799

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a matrimonial compromise and the complainant's consent, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC Section 406 IPC

Sandhya Gupta v. Shri Ganesh Traders

30 Jan 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court held that a director who validly resigned before cheque issuance cannot be held liable under Section 138 NI Act, quashing summons against Abhishek Gupta while upholding summons against Sandhya Gupta as an active director.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act director liability resignation of director Section 168 Companies Act

Rameshwar Singh Tanwar v. Union of India

30 Jan 2026 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2026:DHC:742-DB

The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act where compensation was deposited in court and tendered to the landowner, dismissing the petition seeking declaration of lapse due to non-payment and non-possession.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 compensation deposit possession

Mohd. Ubaid v. Union of India

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2026:DHC:780
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that mere suspicion of intoxication without contemporaneous medical evidence cannot deny compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, allowing the appellant's claim for injuries sustained in a railway accident.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 untoward incident strict liability intoxication

Satish Kumar v. Mayawati

30 Jan 2026 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2026:DHC:764
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's closure of the petitioner's evidence, holding that ample opportunities had been granted and no illegality was shown.

civil appeal_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India closure of evidence trial court discretion condonation of delay

M/S OM NANOTECH PVT LTD v. M/S VENUS COMPUTER SERVICES

30 Jan 2026 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2026:DHC:765

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place additional relevant documents on record after framing of issues but before evidence recording, subject to costs, setting aside the trial court's dismissal order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 14 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India late filing of documents negligence of counsel

Sumit Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:800

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 406, 498A, 34, and 506(2) IPC on compromise and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Love Verma & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:801

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of a compromise and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Kaushal Kumar Yadav & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:802

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under BNS 2023 for attempt to commit culpable homicide based on a genuine compromise between parties in a private dispute involving minor injuries.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise in criminal case Section 528 BNSS private dispute

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. UNISON HOTELS PVT. LTD.

30 Jan 2026 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2026:DHC:723

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to inordinate delay in pronouncement that adversely affected the tribunal's jurisdictional findings, emphasizing that delay alone is insufficient unless it impacts the award's validity.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitral award delay Section 34 Arbitration Act jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal inordinate delay

Sameer Ahmad v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi

30 Jan 2026 · Girish Kathpalia · 2026:DHC:749

Anticipatory bail granted to accused in Arms Act case due to lack of direct incriminating evidence beyond co-accused's statement and material circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Arms Act confessional statement co-accused

Harsh Bhati & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

30 Jan 2026 · Manoj Jain

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of grievance under its inherent powers.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Asian Patent Attorneys Association (Indian Group) v. Registrar General

30 Jan 2026 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2026:DHC:812-DB

The Delhi High Court held that its Registry cannot refuse to accept Execution Petitions below ₹2 crores based on pecuniary jurisdiction limits, and such jurisdictional objections must be decided judicially after filing.

civil petition_allowed Significant Execution Petition Pecuniary Jurisdiction Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 Registry powers

State Bank of India v. V. C. Jain

30 Jan 2026 · The Chief Justice; Tejas Karia; Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya · 2026:DHC:722-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that an employee acquitted on benefit of doubt after dismissal for criminal conviction is not entitled to count suspension period as service or receive back wages, affirming employer's discretion in such matters.

labor appeal_allowed Significant suspension period pensionary benefits reinstatement conditions benefit of doubt acquittal