Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
ORBIT IN TE RIO v. AMERICAN EPAY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court referred the petition seeking interim relief to the appointed arbitrator to be disposed of under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Hav Jyoti Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that diseases arising post-entry are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer, and clarified the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction over such tribunal decisions.
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. MAYA DEVI
The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's liability to pay compensation in a motor accident claim, holding that mere allegations of fraud without proof cannot absolve the insurer from indemnity obligations.
N.M. THEERTHEGOWDA v. Y.M. ASHOK KUMAR
The Supreme Court upheld the imposition of ten times penalty on deficit stamp duty under Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act where the appellant agreed to pay duty and penalty at interlocutory stage, dismissing the appeal.
SEETHARAMA SHETTY v. MONAPPA SHETTY
The Supreme Court held that when an insufficiently stamped instrument is sent to the District Registrar under Section 37(2) of the Karnataka Stamp Act, the court cannot impose ten times penalty under Section 34, and the penalty must be determined by the District Registrar under Section 39.
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by two months under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.
SPML Infra Limited v. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by six months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
SPML Infra Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to counsel's unavailability and prior adjournments.
9560995495 v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the State and pharmaceutical companies to ensure timely access, transparent pricing, and proper distribution of medicines for minors suffering from Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, emphasizing the constitutional right to health.
Dimeco Formerly Known As Dimeco Alipresse v. Central Organisation for Modernization of Workshops Through Controller of Stores & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondents.
Bhadra International India Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that there is no bar to granting a second extension of an arbitrator's mandate under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months.
TATA PROJECTS LIMITED v. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by three months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable the passing of the reserved award.
M/S JMC-CHEC JOINT VENTURE v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the learned Arbitrator by four months under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
M/S AOM ADVERTISING PVT. LTD v. M/S DELHI TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by six months under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings with no objection from the respondent.
FIEM INDUSTRIES LTD v. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the learned Arbitrator by three months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Mothers Pride Educational Personna Private Limited
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable resolution of disputes between the parties.
Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Scholar Tube Education and Learning Solutions Private Limited
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable the conclusion of pending arbitration proceedings.
Minaxi Rohit Biradar v. Rohit Bhimashankar Biradar
The Bombay High Court allowed the wife's application to transfer matrimonial proceedings from Mumbai to Pune, emphasizing the paramount importance of her convenience under Section 24 CPC and rejecting the husband's objections.
Rajiv S. Somani v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Revenue Minister's order restoring mutation in favor of Mrs. Lukmani, holding that revenue authorities lack jurisdiction to decide disputed gift validity and religious faith, which are civil court matters.
Kalaskarwadi Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a government corrigendum effecting substantive policy change without mandatory procedural approval is invalid, but registrations granted under it during the interim period are protected to avoid economic disruption.