Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Gulshan Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent between the parties.
Farhan Rahman & Ors v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406 and 498A IPC based on a bona fide settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Amit Kumar Tyagi & Ors v. State & Anr
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the criminal petition filed by Amit Kumar Tyagi and others as withdrawn on the request of the petitioners.
Nttin Chandani & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent.
Prashant Kakria & Ors v. State (GNCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a bona fide mediation settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Vikas Vicky & Anr v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related criminal proceedings under Sections 308, 326, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement reached through mediation, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Vabcill Ahmed & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all related proceedings under Sections 448, 380, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of grievance.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent between the parties.
Banwari Lal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Furkan Khan v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the married parties reached through court mediation.
Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court mandated comprehensive financial disclosure affidavits at the outset of matrimonial litigation under the Hindu Marriage Act to ensure truthful income disclosure and expeditious adjudication of maintenance claims, emphasizing the Court's active role in eliciting truth and curbing frivolous litigation.
Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court mandated mandatory affidavits of assets, income, and expenditure by parties in matrimonial cases to ensure truthful disclosure and speedy disposal of maintenance claims, emphasizing the Court's active role in eliciting truth and curbing frivolous litigation.
Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court mandated comprehensive financial disclosure affidavits at the outset of matrimonial litigation to ensure expeditious and truthful adjudication of maintenance claims under the Hindu Marriage Act.
M.P. Goenka v. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)
The Delhi High Court upheld a penalty under the Customs Act based on corroborated confessional statements and evidence despite the appellant's retracted confession obtained under duress.
Mrs. Chanderma v. Balinder Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation awarded to a maid servant injured in a motor accident, clarifying assessment of loss of earning capacity and non-pecuniary damages in personal injury claims.
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Hariom & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, enhanced the notional income for a deceased student in a motor accident claim, disallowed future prospects addition, and upheld just and reasonable compensation.
ORIENTAL INSURACNE COMPANY LTD. v. TIMAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court reduced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the multiplier based on claimant's age and denying future prospects for fixed wage earner, following binding Supreme Court precedents.
Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court mandated comprehensive financial disclosure at the outset of matrimonial litigation and emphasized the Family Courts' duty to actively elicit truth and ensure speedy maintenance proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Imran Ali v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking mandamus to recognize the Leader of Opposition in the 16th Lok Sabha, holding no constitutional or statutory mandate exists for such appointment.
Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court mandates comprehensive financial disclosure affidavits at the outset of matrimonial litigation to ensure speedy, truthful adjudication of maintenance claims and curb frivolous litigation.