Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
NARENDRA KUMAR AMIN v. CBI
The Supreme Court held that filing of the police report within 90 days with required particulars satisfies the condition for default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., and dismissed the appellant's claim for default bail in the Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case.
Mansoor Alam v. State of U.P. & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for a murder convict with serious criminal antecedents, emphasizing the need to consider such antecedents before granting bail.
Mahesh Kumar Joshi v. Madan Singh Negi
The Supreme Court allowed setting aside of an ex-parte decree in a summary suit for dishonour of cheque, granting leave to defend subject to deposit of the decretal amount to balance equities.
State of Punjab v. Bawa Singh
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's lenient sentence reduction in a grievous injury case, emphasizing that sentencing must be proportionate to the offence's gravity to maintain public confidence and deterrence.
Supreme Court in Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and v. Anr., 2013(l]) SCALE 329
The court directed constitution of the Town Vending Committee within eight weeks and granted interim protection to street vendors from eviction until vending certificates are issued under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Director of Income Tax v. Qualcomm Incorporated New Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeals against the ITAT order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act as non-maintainable since the grounds had already been raised in an earlier appeal.
Shabnambegum v. NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a neighborly dispute based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to maintain peace.
Sanjay Malik v. Priya Malik
The court directed the petitioner to comply with the interim maintenance order to revive the dismissed appeal, leaving the rent entitlement issue to be decided by the Appellate Court.
Rahul Mangla & Ors v. 0FNCT0FDELHI & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mutual settlement and payment between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sh. Shawal Sharma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, subject to payment of a settlement amount.
Ajay Gaur v. Vijay Gaur & Ors.
The High Court set aside the Magistrate's order directing FIR registration under Section 156(3) CrPC but held the trial court may proceed with the complaint under Section 204 CrPC; petition dismissed as cited precedent was inapplicable.
Sajid Khan & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 323, 341, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement with reasonable compensation and imposed costs for misuse of state machinery.
Akshod Kumar Sharma v. Master Shree Sharma
The Delhi High Court set aside trial court orders closing cross-examination and evidence in a maintenance proceeding, directing fair opportunity for cross-examination and continuation of maintenance payments pending final adjudication.
Sanjay Kumar & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC on the parties' amicable settlement, subject to compliance with financial terms for the minor children.
Acchar Manraw v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent between the parties.
Mohd Hanif & Ors v. The State & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the spouse.
Dilip Kumar Mehto v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Raman Chandiok & Ors v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Suchi Seth
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following a bona fide settlement and divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Kuldeep Lal v. Suman Rani
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing appeal but dismissed it with directions to the Family Court to expeditiously decide the mutual consent divorce petition within six months.
TUSHARGAUR & Ors. v. STATE & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute and directed release of alimony and goods.