Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
O P Saini & Ors. v. Kailash Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to vacate an interim injunction restraining sale of disputed property, holding that the plaintiffs made out a prima facie case and the sale order was obtained by suppressing material facts.
K Narayana Rao v. CBI
The High Court declined to quash the summons under Section 482 Cr.P.C., holding that the petitioner must raise his pleas before the trial court at the charge framing stage where they shall be decided by a reasoned order.
Rishi Khurana v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners in a criminal case arising from a settled dispute, subject to cooperation with investigation and compliance with bail conditions.
Rishi Khurana v. State NCT of Delhi; Baldev Raj Khurana v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim bail to accused petitioners in a criminal case based on an amicable compromise and nearing completion of investigation, subject to conditions and liberty to complainant to revoke bail if compromise fails.
Sanjeev Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused under Sections 420/34 IPC, holding that bail cannot be granted where there is a risk of tampering with evidence and the petitioner’s role is significant, despite co-accused being granted bail.
M/S Bindal Exports & Imports v. Manik Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, holding that the suit for mandatory injunction was not barred by limitation as the cause of action was continuous and concurrent factual findings by lower courts cannot be disturbed in a second appeal.
Commissioner of Income Tax-II v. Lalit Kumar Poddar
The Delhi High Court held that losses from intraday share trading are not automatically speculative and interest-free loans cannot be added under Section 68 if creditors' identity and creditworthiness are established, remanding the loss issue for fresh consideration.
Col. Devender Singh Solanki v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the government to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's pending representations challenging the rejection of an alternative plot allotment based on corrected property ownership facts.
Kusum Sharma v. Mahinder Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court mandated comprehensive financial disclosure affidavits by parties at the outset of matrimonial litigation to ensure truthful income disclosure, expedite maintenance proceedings, and uphold justice.
Prosenjeet Banerjee v. Leena Baretto
The High Court held that a domestic servant allowed to reside gratuitously cannot claim any right in the premises and a plaint disclosing no cause of action on this ground is liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
Santosh Devi v. Ombir Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's dismissal of a suit for possession and injunction under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove illegal dispossession and had no legal title over government-acquired land.
Harpreet Singh v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 138 NI Act must be returned to the appropriate court if it has not reached the stage of Section 145(2), affirming territorial jurisdiction principles from Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod.
FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED RESEARCH IN CANCER v. DDA
The Delhi High Court held that a clarificatory Notification exempting certain institutions from additional FAR charges operates retrospectively, entitling similarly situated petitioners to refunds despite prior finalization of their cases.
Mukesh Aggarwal v. Atul Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that mere suspicion of bias does not amount to de jure inability under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act and dismissed the petition seeking termination of the arbitrator's mandate.
Mobin Khan v. Ms Mobina Khan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to summon police officers as witnesses to prove an unrelated inquiry report, holding that such evidence was irrelevant in domestic violence proceedings.
Customs v. Badri Prasad
The High Court allowed the petition to reopen prosecution evidence and directed examination of an essential witness to ensure a just trial in a serious criminal case.
Jaideep Singh Bhatia & Anr. v. Orchid Overseas P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and upheld the condonation of a 12-day delay in filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, accepting the explanation of the complainant's representative's leave and filing immediately after court vacations.
Laxmeshwar Jha v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.
Satish Sharma v. Ved Prakash & Ors.
The High Court declined to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when an alternate efficacious remedy was available before the trial court.
Gaurav Garg & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.