Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Kant & Ors. v. The Registrar, Co-op. Group Housing Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a government notification excluding charge-sheeted cooperative society members from regularisation of irregular self-draw allotments, dismissing their challenge to entitlement of flats.
Ritu Sahu Jain v. Ashok Sardana and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the Financial Commissioner's order disqualifying the petitioner from cooperative society membership for owning residential land in extended lal dora, affirming the revisional jurisdiction delegated under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act.
The Gewa Sampada Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. v. Jeet Mal Hirawat
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions modifying the arbitration award to direct refund of amounts paid with interest, holding the claims challenging allotment after long delay were barred by limitation and the award impracticable to implement.
Rajesh K Ranjan v. Delhi Medical Council
The Delhi High Court held that a qualified physiotherapist cannot be prevented from running his clinic by the Medical Council unless he unlawfully practices allopathy, and quashed the order closing the physiotherapy clinic.
Nirmala v. Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the dissolution of marriage on the ground of mental cruelty caused by false and baseless allegations of illicit relations made by the wife against the husband.
Arun Kumar Tetri v. Vandna Arora & Anr
The Delhi High Court modified the interim maintenance awarded under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, directing the husband to pay Rs. 20,000 per month for the minor child, recognizing the obligation of both employed parents to contribute towards maintenance.
Tower Vision India Private Limited v. Videocon Telecommunications Limited
Delhi High Court holds it has jurisdiction under Section 9 Arbitration Act over disputes between telecom infrastructure providers and operators, allowing interim relief claims but defers substantive adjudication to Arbitral Tribunal.
Viom Networks Limited v. Videocon Telecommunications Limited
Delhi High Court upheld its jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act in a telecom infrastructure dispute, limiting lock-in charges to reasonable compensation under Section 74 of the Contract Act, and rejecting respondent's jurisdictional and maintainability objections.
Shri Chander Bhan v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act with an award over five years old, without possession or compensation, are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
ATC Telecom Tower Corporation Pvt. Ltd. v. Videocon Telecommunications Ltd.
Delhi High Court upheld its jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to grant interim relief securing exit fees and outstanding dues in a telecom infrastructure sharing dispute despite respondent's spectrum sale and financial difficulties.
Ayub @ Munna v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges after admitting additional blood group evidence disproving forensic reports, emphasizing the necessity of corroborated evidence for conviction.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nadeem Ahmed and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim award directing Rs.10 lakhs deposit without disability proof but granted Rs.25,000 interim relief with interest upon production of a disability certificate under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Indus Towers Limited v. Videocon Telecommunications Limited Formerly Known As Datacom Solutions Ltd
Delhi High Court held that interim relief under Section 9 Arbitration Act is maintainable in disputes between telecom infrastructure providers and operators, enforcing exit charges as genuine pre-estimate of damages, and granted security and injunction pending arbitration.
Satbir Singh Malik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition under the 1894 Act lapses if compensation is not paid within five years, applying section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and declared the acquisition of petitioners' land lapsed.
Indu Arora v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation has occurred within five years of the award.
Friends Motel Pvt. Ltd. v. Supertrack Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to pay outstanding rent and utility dues in installments and allowed correction of typographical errors in its earlier order, while leaving other disputes to arbitration.
M/S. APJ LABORATORIES PVT.LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition challenging auction proceedings due to non-compliance with conditional payment orders but allowed the petitioner to pursue one-time settlement with the bank.
Hindusthan Urban Infrastructure Ltd. v. Ramesh Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement for residential occupation and rejecting the tenant's plea of alternative accommodation.
Aditya Mahajan v. Shachi Mahajan
The Delhi High Court held that visitation rights should not be restricted based on a single interaction with a hesitant child and directed Family Courts to use counselling to facilitate parent-child bonding and progressively increase visitation.
M/S Habib Enterprises v. M/S Nature Essence Pvt Ltd and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer and consolidation of two identical suits pending in different courts to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and facilitate combined trial.