Full Text
Translation output
$--6 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO 239/2012& C.M.18729/2014
RAM LAL YADAV & ANR Appellants
Through: Nemo
FAO 239/2012& C.M.18729/2014
RAM LAL YADAV & ANR Appellants
Through: Nemo
VERSUS
MASTER RANJEET KUMAR MINOR & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr.Sidharth Chopra,Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3
Through: Mr.Sidharth Chopra,Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
14.09.2016 Since IS"^ September,2016 was declared aholiday,therefore,this tE matter is being taken up today i.e. on 14 September,2016.
Learned counsel for contesting respondents No. 1 to 3 submits that this appeal is liable to be dismissed on the ground that appellant No.l-
Ram Lai Yadav had expired in August,20,15 and his legal heirs have not been brought on record.
It is pointed out that on the ground ofconcealment ofthe fact that this property has been sold by appellant No.l to third party, this appeal deserves to be dismissed.
Since none appears on behalfofappellant even on the second call, therefore,this appeal and the application are dismissed in default.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 14,2016 s - ■
2016:DHC:8526
14.09.2016 Since IS"^ September,2016 was declared aholiday,therefore,this tE matter is being taken up today i.e. on 14 September,2016.
Learned counsel for contesting respondents No. 1 to 3 submits that this appeal is liable to be dismissed on the ground that appellant No.l-
Ram Lai Yadav had expired in August,20,15 and his legal heirs have not been brought on record.
It is pointed out that on the ground ofconcealment ofthe fact that this property has been sold by appellant No.l to third party, this appeal deserves to be dismissed.
Since none appears on behalfofappellant even on the second call, therefore,this appeal and the application are dismissed in default.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 14,2016 s - ■
2016:DHC:8526
JUDGMENT