Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India (Ministry of Health & Family Welfare) v. Enarch Consultants Pvt. Limited
The Court held that the 30-day extension under the Arbitration Act proviso cannot be invoked if the original three-month limitation period expired before court vacation, dismissing the petition as barred by limitation.
Rajiv Mittal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants in a dowry death case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the death was homicidal and that the suicide note raised reasonable doubt about the cause of death.
Gaurav Jhamb & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled and obtained a divorce by mutual consent.
Vikram Krishnan v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision treating advances received by a director-shareholder as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e), dismissing the appeal for lack of substantial question of law.
Surjeet v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition directing the Deputy Commissioner of Police to comply with an earlier order within a week and communicate the same to the petitioner.
Rajender Kumar v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court directed the Deputy Commissioner of Police to dispose of the petitioner's representation within one week, ensuring compliance with an earlier court order.
Sushma Gupta v. Poonam Suri
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw her petition and dismissed it as withdrawn after she was appointed as Notary Public.
Sushant Agarwal v. Vyoma Agarwal
The High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition rendered infructuous by the appointment of a new Family Court judge, dismissing it with liberty to seek relief before the trial court.
R R Sharma & Anr. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that contractual employees cannot claim regularization without sanctioned posts but are entitled to minimum wages for their service period.
Rajeev Kumar Yadav v. Archaeological Survey of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the 100-meter prohibited area around a protected monument is measured from the monument's physical structure as declared, not from the outer boundary wall, and dismissed petitions challenging construction permissions accordingly.
Ashwani Daggar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Salaudin Saifi & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Mathews J. Nedumpara and Ors. v. Shri Fali S. Nariman and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the literal interpretation of Rule 6 of the Bar Council of India Rules, dismissing the petition to expand the definition of 'Court' and reaffirming judicial restraint in statutory interpretation.
Iris Computers Ltd v. State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Canara Bank must honour the letter of credit and pay the Plaintiff as the alleged discrepancies were invalid and the bank cannot refuse payment except on valid grounds of fraud or irretrievable damage.
M/S NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. RAJ KISHAN & CO
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award except for restricting one claim amount, affirming limited interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting double compensation for delay.
Ahlcons (India) Pvt Ltd v. Victoria Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition as barred by limitation under Article 18 of the Limitation Act, holding that the claim did not arise from a mutual open and current account and that Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply to winding up petitions.
Amonchit Suriya Kiran & Anr. v. National Restaurant & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the partnership firm dissolved upon the death of one partner, denying tenancy protection to the surviving partner who was held an unauthorized occupant liable to be evicted by the rightful owners.
The State Govt of N.C.T of Delhi v. Satyavir Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discharge of accused in a dowry harassment case due to vague and unsubstantial allegations lacking particulars and corroboration.
Vikas Shah v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a POCSO and IPC case despite non-bailable warrants, emphasizing compliance with court appearances and non-prejudice to trial.
Monu @ Sandeep v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case due to lack of incriminating evidence and failure of eyewitnesses to identify him, emphasizing bail as the rule and jail as the exception.