Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union Public Service Commission v. R J R Kasibhatla
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing UPSC to recommend the respondent's appointment, holding that UPSC's rejection of the respondent's claimed legal experience during his full-time LL.M. studies was a reasonable administrative decision not warranting judicial interference.
Prakash Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of criminal breach of trust on condition of depositing Rs. 75 lakhs and furnishing bail bond and surety, while safeguarding the complainant’s interests.
Monu v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner husband accused under Sections 498A, 307, and 34 IPC, noting his absence at the time of the alleged offence and nearing completion of investigation.
Shobha Rani and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of compassionate appointment nearly ten years after the death of the breadwinner, holding that such appointments address immediate financial needs and do not survive long delays.
State Bank of Patiala v. M/S GABS and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the bank was entitled to charge compound interest with monthly rests as per the loan agreement, setting aside the appellate tribunal's order awarding only simple interest.
Comandant Ranjeet Singh Rana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the DG's displeasure notes and ordered reassessment of the petitioner's APAR after finding procedural irregularities and arbitrariness in the downgrading process.
Savita Bansal & Ors. v. Narender Barmecha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of civil petitions following an amicable settlement involving payment and possession undertakings by the respondents.
Savita Bansal & Ors. v. Narender Barmecha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of civil petitions following an amicable settlement with payment and possession undertakings duly complied with by the respondents.
Naveen Aggarwal & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related criminal proceedings under Sections 452/323/34 IPC based on a mediated settlement, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC where the dispute was predominantly civil and amicably resolved.
Pravez & Anr v. State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Dharampal & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Amod Kumar Verma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC on the ground of settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC, subject to costs.
GMA First India (P) Ltd India v. Genius Mind Consultancy SDN BHD & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for injunction and damages arising from termination of a franchise agreement due to lack of pleaded particulars and allowed liberty to file a fresh suit on a separate undertaking.
Radico Khaitan Ltd. v. M/S. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the registered proprietor Radico Khaitan Ltd. restraining Devans Modern Breweries Ltd. from using the trademark ELECTRA, holding that the defendant failed to prove prior use and that the plaintiff's pre-launch activities constituted bona fide use under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Damont Developers Pvt. Ltd v. BRYS Hotels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration Act, the Court must appoint an arbitrator if a valid arbitration agreement exists, leaving objections like insufficient stamping to the arbitral tribunal.
International Centre for Alternative Dispute Resolution v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court stayed the takeover of ICADR's assets under the New Delhi International Arbitration Centre Ordinance, 2019, emphasizing limited judicial review of Ordinance promulgation under Article 123 and balancing equities pending legislative approval.
Rajeev Kumar Yadav v. Archaeological Survey of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Archaeological Survey of India's regulatory actions, affirming the lawful exercise of statutory powers for heritage site protection.
Rajendra Singh v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging discharge of accused in a misappropriation case, holding no prima facie case was made out and the petitioner’s complaint was motivated by personal vendetta.
AAIC Building Solutions Ltd. v. Archaeological Survey of India
The Delhi High Court upheld most of the arbitral award on damages and penalty, limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, but set aside unproven electricity charges.
Hemant Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.