Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nancy Aggarwal v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 497, 498, and 506 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Sachin Garg & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable mediated settlement, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Ankur Sharma & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Hifzur Rehman & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Satbir Singh v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 363 IPC on the ground of settlement and voluntary marriage, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Syniverse Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India; M/s MNP Interconnection Telecom Solutions India Private Limited v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
The Delhi High Court quashed TRAI's 2018 Amendment reducing MNP transaction charges payable only on successful porting as ultra vires and arbitrary, emphasizing transparency and statutory conformity in regulatory tariff fixation.
Syniverse Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India; MNP Interconnection Telecom Solutions India Private Limited v. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
The Delhi High Court quashed TRAI's 2018 Amendment reducing MNP service providers' transaction charges payable only on successful porting as arbitrary, non-transparent, and ultra vires the TRAI Act and Article 14.
Shivi Talwar v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 do not lapse if declarations are issued within one year after exclusion of stay periods, dismissing petitions challenging acquisition on grounds of lapse.
LT COL S S RAO v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a transfer order as infructuous after the respondents withdrew the transfer order.
Mukesh Saini v. Madanlal Saini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim order permitting execution of a sale deed of HUF property subject to deposit of part of the sale consideration in court to protect the dissenting co-owner's interest.
M/S INFONOX SOFTWARE PVT.LTD. & ORS v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their petitions with liberty to raise defenses regarding wilful default under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act before the Criminal Court and to approach the High Court again after the appellate order attains finality.
Anitapal & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petitions and associated applications as withdrawn on the petitioners' request.
ACHARYA ASHOKANANDA MAHARAJ v. STATE
Bail petitions were dismissed in default due to non-appearance of petitioners despite repeated calls by the court.
Yogender Jha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing a 79-year-old street vendor to continue vending at his site pending functional Town Vending Committee and alternative site, upholding protections under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Union of India & Ors. v. Satish Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld CAT's order granting advance increments to an employee for higher qualifications acquired before the effective date, ruling that limitation cannot be imposed when delay is due to employer's negligence.
All Services Global Pvt Limited v. Resident Commissioner Government of Madhya Pradesh
The Delhi High Court held that the respondent lost the right to appoint an arbitrator after the petitioner triggered arbitration proceedings and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Mohit Sharma & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. arising from a matrimonial dispute involving non-compoundable offences, following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Satender Singh Nakoti v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC permits such quashing when no conviction is likely and the ends of justice require it.
AKM Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Ahluwalia Contract (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition challenging the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner's counter claim, holding that counter claims can be raised without prior notice and must be adjudicated on merit.
UNI AIR CARGO PVT LTD v. SHARONS LINK LOGISTICS AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court summarily dismissed a commercial suit for recovery of money due to discrepancies in invoices and lack of clear pleadings, emphasizing strict compliance with procedural requirements under Order XIIIA CPC.