Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. M/s NEW INDIA DETERGENTS LTD.
The Supreme Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that the exclusion clause did not exempt it from paying storage charges awarded by the consumer forum.
Dr Sharmila Sandesh Ghuge v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a State Government amendment prescribing the date of promotion for Assistant Professors to Associate Professors as the date of selection by CAS, rejecting claims of arbitrariness and discrimination under Articles 14 and 21.
Bafna Motors Private Limited v. Amanulla Khan
The Bombay High Court held that disputes over refund of security deposit and damages under a Leave and License Agreement are arbitrable and not barred by the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Small Causes under section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.
M/s. Sai Pushp Enterprises & Ors. v. Thane Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the demand for 2% of project cost as a conservation deposit beyond the notified Eco Sensitive Zone lacks statutory authority and quashed the demand, directing issuance of completion certificates without the deposit.
J. N. Meena v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that the appellate authority's revisional order under Rule 29(1)(v) CCS(CCA) Rules was illegal for failure to comply with the mandatory six-month time limit and procedural safeguards, quashing the order and setting aside the Tribunal's dismissal.
Girish Uttamrao Kohok v. Ratan Hiraji Deore
The Bombay High Court allowed the second appeal and granted specific performance of a sale agreement despite initial refusal on technical grounds, holding that non-sanction of final layout is not a bar and credible oral evidence suffices to prove payment and readiness to perform.
Bhag Singh v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld compensation of Rs.4 lakhs per acre for land acquired in Village Sohana under the 1990 notification, rejecting higher compensation claims based on non-adjoining villages and subsequent acquisitions.
Swadesh Kumar Agarwal v. Dinesh Kumar Agarwal & Ors
The Supreme Court held that termination of an arbitrator's mandate on grounds of undue delay must be decided by the court under section 14(2) and that an application under section 11(6) is not maintainable absent a written arbitration agreement.
Bharat Sangh v. Navneet Kumar
The Supreme Court upheld the ACC’s valid refusal to extend the petitioner’s tenure as Judicial Member of the Central Administrative Tribunal, emphasizing adherence to procedural rules and discretionary authority.
Union of India v. Navneet Kumar
The Supreme Court upheld the ACC's rejection of extension of tenure of a CAT Judicial Member, emphasizing adherence to procedural rules and binding nature of CAT and CJI recommendations.
Union of India v. Navneet Kumar
The Supreme Court held that the ACC lawfully denied extension of a Judicial Member's term in accordance with the Selection Committee's binding recommendation to carry forward vacancies, setting aside the High Court's contrary order.
Reddy Veerana v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
The court upheld the acquisition and compensation awarded for commercial land in NOIDA, affirming market value-based compensation with justified deductions and recognizing the appellant's ownership rights over unacquired land portions.
Reddy Veerana v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's direction to pay compensation at the commercial circle rate without deduction for development charges, imposed penal interest for delay, and dismissed NOIDA's appeal, affirming the landowner's right to just compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Reddy Veerana v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
The court upheld the validity of land acquisition and compensation based on market value with reasonable development charge deductions, affirming prior binding precedents and dismissing challenges to acquisition notifications.
Reddy Veerana v. New Okhla Industrial Development Authority
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's right to compensation at the circle rate without development charge deductions, imposed statutory and penal interest, and dismissed NOIDA's appeal, emphasizing just compensation and protection of property rights under Article 300A.
J. Sekar Reddy v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court quashed PMLA proceedings against the appellant due to lack of evidence of scheduled offence and proceeds of crime, emphasizing that criminal prosecution cannot continue when adjudication exonerates on merits.
J. Sekar Reddy v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Supreme Court quashed PMLA proceedings against the appellant due to closure of scheduled offence FIR for lack of evidence and exoneration in adjudication proceedings, holding that prosecution under PMLA requires a valid scheduled offence and proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Ritu Maheshwari v. M/S. Promotional Club
The Supreme Court held that applicants have no right to allotment under a terminated public scheme and must seek allotment under prevailing schemes, setting aside the High Court's order favoring the applicant club.
Ritu Maheshwari v. Promotional Club
The Supreme Court held that termination of a development scheme extinguishes allotment rights under it, upheld Noida's new scheme allotments, and set aside High Court orders directing consideration under the closed scheme.