Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Hashmiya Bahrul Faiz Social Welfare Association v. Abdullah M. Shukur Qureshi

High Court of Bombay · 22 Aug 1963

The Full Bench held that employees of D.Ed and B.Ed colleges not recognised under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977 do not have a right of appeal under Section 9 of the Act, affirming the Single Judge's decision and rejecting the Division Bench's contrary view.

administrative appeal_dismissed

Paramanand Builders LLP v. Competent Authority & District Deputy Mumbai City (4)

High Court of Bombay · 20 Jun 1963

The Bombay High Court upheld the Competent Authority's order granting unilateral deemed conveyance under MOFA, ruling that statutory obligations to convey ownership to flat purchasers override private agreements limiting rights to leasehold interests.

property appeal_dismissed

Sangeeta Jeswani & Ors. v. Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 16 Apr 1963 · 2024:DHC:101-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a prior equitable mortgage and dismissed the petitioners' challenge to the recovery and sale of the mortgaged property, rejecting their bona fide purchaser and forgery claims.

civil petition_dismissed

Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay v. M/s. Karnani Building

High Court of Bombay · 12 Dec 1962

The Bombay High Court held that in absence of a court-fixed standard rent under the Bombay Rent Act, the agreed rent after renovation is the proper basis for fixing rateable value under the BMC Act, restoring the municipal assessment and allowing the appeal.

property appeal_allowed

Atul Bapusaheb Jadhav & Ors. v. Sharadrao Daulatrao Jadhav & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 18 Dec 1961

The Bombay High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the validity of a partition deed and the finding that the defendant was a gratuitous licensee, not an adverse possessor, affirming concurrent factual findings of lower courts.

civil appeal_dismissed

Reshu Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 01 Oct 1960

The Bombay High Court held that an employee who completed the maximum probation period without confirmation is entitled to confirmation by implication and directed issuance of confirmation and consequential benefits.

labor petition_allowed

HARDEV SINGH v. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY

Supreme Court of India · 03 Feb 1960

Sub-lessees under a Government lease for agricultural purposes do not acquire independent tenure-holder status under the Ceiling Act without complying with lease conditions, and their land is included in the original lessee's holding for ceiling purposes.

property appeal_dismissed

HARDEV SINGH v. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY

Supreme Court of India · 03 Feb 1960

Sub-lessees under a Government lease who fail to comply with lease conditions do not acquire independent tenure holder status under the Uttar Pradesh Ceiling Act, and the original Government lessee remains the real holder for ceiling purposes.

property appeal_dismissed

Kartik Harshad Jhaveri v. Charanjit Arora & The State of Maharashtra

High Court of Bombay · 02 Mar 1959 · 2025:BHC-AS:55472

The High Court held that complaints under Section 138 NI Act filed beyond limitation after return by a court lacking jurisdiction are barred unless delay is condoned, and quashed cognizance and related orders, restoring condonation applications for fresh adjudication.

criminal appeal_allowed

Satara District Bar Association v. State of Maharashtra

High Court of Bombay · 22 Jul 1958

The Bombay High Court upheld its administrative approvals establishing courts at Wai, ruling that multiple factors beyond case pendency justify such decisions and that the High Court’s administrative primacy and confidentiality in internal deliberations are paramount.

administrative petition_dismissed

Bhagwan Waman Gaikwad and Ors. v. Pralhad Dunda Jadhav and Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 04 Jan 1957

The Bombay High Court upheld tenancy rights and fixation of purchase price under the Tenancy Act for protected tenants on watan land, ruling that such rights are vested and not negated by statutory provisions requiring prior sanction for leases.

property appeal_dismissed

Sarla Performance Fibers Limited v. The Union of India

High Court of Bombay · 18 Dec 1956

The Bombay High Court held that cancellation of a bonded warehouse licence based on vague and premature show cause notices without adequate opportunity of hearing violates natural justice and set aside the cancellation order.

administrative appeal_allowed

Ram Kishor Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement

Supreme Court of India · 17 Sep 1956 · 2023 INSC 1082

The Supreme Court held that informing the arrested person of the grounds of arrest orally with contemporaneous acknowledgment satisfies Section 19 of PMLA and upheld the arrest, rejecting retrospective application of the Pankaj Bansal judgment.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Sagaru Laxman Shinde v. Mukund Shankar Kurlekar & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 19 Aug 1956

The Court held that prior to the 1969 amendment, landlords were not obliged to inform tenants of attaining majority, and tenants who failed to exercise purchase rights within prescribed time lose such rights, upholding the dismissal of tenant's claim to purchase the land.

property petition_dismissed

MAS DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. MAGUS CONSORTIUM ORCHID AVENUE (P) LTD.

Delhi High Court · 16 Aug 1956 · 2023:DHC:1314

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for lack of adequate reasoning and invalid termination based on delay where time was not the essence of the contract.

civil petition_allowed

Shri Jaykumar B. Patil v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

High Court of Bombay · 31 Mar 1956

Advance from company to substantial shareholder used for personal income tax payment, not business, constitutes deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) despite repayment within the same year.

tax appeal_dismissed

Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation v. Nandkishor Govind Sane

High Court of Bombay · 06 Sep 1954 · 2026:BHC-AS:1893-DB

The Bombay High Court held that a settlement agreement arrived during conciliation proceedings is binding on all employees, including non-union members, and complaints for its enforcement are maintainable within limitation from the date of breach.

labor appeal_dismissed

The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited v. Maharashtra State Electricity Board & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 21 Jan 1953

The court held that MSEB is the real tenant entitled to eviction, rejecting the State Government tenancy claim, and allowed the writ petition setting aside concurrent decrees dismissing the eviction suit.

civil appeal_allowed

Royal Realtors Landmarks Pvt. Ltd. v. Shubham/Pallavi/Mayur

High Court of Bombay · 06 Jul 1952

The Bombay High Court upheld and decreed the consent terms executed between parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, rejecting allegations of fraud and illegality, thereby enforcing the settlement in a joint development dispute.

civil appeal_allowed

Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) No.7 v. M/s. Byramjee Jeejibhoy Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

High Court of Bombay · 21 Jul 1951 · 2024 Live Law SC 1054

The Bombay High Court held that only the registered owner with possession at acquisition is entitled to compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, excluding illegal occupants and unauthorized structure owners.

property appeal_allowed