Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Central Bureau of Investigation v. T. Gangi Reddy @ Yerra Gangi Reddy
The Supreme Court held that bail granted on default under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. can be cancelled on merits after filing of chargesheet if strong grounds exist, overruling the High Court's bar on such cancellation.
Delhi Development Authority v. Eminent Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court overruled the High Court's declaration of lapse of land acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that possession taken or compensation paid prevents lapse, clarifying the correct interpretation of the provision.
Delhi Development Authority v. Eminent Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court overruled the High Court's declaration of lapse of land acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that possession or payment of compensation prevents lapse, and deposit in Treasury constitutes payment.
Kumar Reger v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a CISF constable for suppressing a pending criminal case at appointment, affirming limited judicial interference in disciplinary actions within disciplined forces.
Kumar Reger v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the removal of a CISF constable for suppressing a pending criminal case at the time of appointment, affirming that such concealment constitutes grave misconduct justifying dismissal.
Sushil Pandey & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The High Court held that seniority lists for Uttar Pradesh Police promotions must strictly comply with statutory rules, excluding retired/deceased officers and properly integrating direct recruits and promotees, setting aside the flawed 2013 list.
Delhi Development Authority v. Beena Gupta
The Supreme Court held that a subsequent purchaser has no locus to challenge land acquisition lapsing under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act where possession was taken prior to the Act's commencement, and acquisition does not lapse merely due to non-payment of compensation.
Delhi Development Authority v. Beena Gupta
The Supreme Court held that acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken, and a subsequent purchaser cannot challenge acquisition after award.
Bharat Sarkar v. Rajiv Khan
The Supreme Court upheld the denial of nursing allowance to BSF nursing assistants, distinguishing them from Armed Forces Nursing Service personnel based on qualifications and duties.
Bharat Sarkar v. Rajib Khan & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that nursing assistants are not entitled to nursing allowance equivalent to staff nurses due to differences in qualifications and experience, allowing the Government's appeal and setting aside the High Court's orders.
The Union of India v. Rajib Khan
The Supreme Court held that Nursing Assistants with lower educational qualifications are not entitled to Nursing Allowance at par with Staff Nurses, affirming that pay classification based on qualifications is constitutionally valid.
Bharat Sarkar v. Rajiv Khan
The Supreme Court held that nursing assistants in the BSF are entitled to nursing pay equivalent to nursing staff, setting aside the High Court's denial based on their designation.
Government of India v. Rajib Khan & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that nursing assistants with lower qualifications and experience than staff nurses are not entitled to nursing allowance equivalent to staff nurses, allowing the Government's appeal and setting aside the High Court's contrary order.
Union of India v. Rajib Khan
The Supreme Court held that Nursing Assistants without requisite qualifications are not entitled to Nursing Allowance at par with Staff Nurses, affirming that pay classification based on educational qualifications is constitutionally valid.
Share Samadhan Limited v. Vinay Prakash Sadh
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to cooperate in arbitration proceedings as per the agreement.
46b984d4f20210688ec190c013f5fa7eaa819a5b98e9ae315b9f8bd77c2478c4
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the increase in authorized share capital and share allotment by a company, affirming compliance with statutory procedures and protection of shareholder rights under the Companies Act, 1956.
The Indian Expressp Ltd v. The Indian Express Newspapers Workers Union Regd and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s award increasing the retirement age of Indian Express workers from 58 to 60 years, affirming the Tribunal’s jurisdiction despite certified Standing Orders under the SO Act.
M/S Sudhakara Infratech Private Limited v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that ambiguous tender clauses must be harmoniously construed to allow societies to participate, upholding the award to a Joint Venture including a society and dismissing the challenge to the tender outcome.
Rajender Kumar Gupta v. Gadiwala Load Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal, setting aside the Trial Court’s cost imposition for seeking adjournment to amend the plaint at an early stage of the suit and directed disposal of the amendment application on merits.
Mohd Junaid Qureshi v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the applicant on the ground of parity with co-accused already on bail, holding that recovery of incriminating material alone does not bar bail when similar circumstances exist.