Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Man Singh v. Shamim Ahmad
A tenant must tender rent directly to the landlord after the landlord's written notice expressing willingness to accept rent; depositing rent in Court thereafter does not prevent eviction under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act.
Man Singh v. Shamim Ahmad
A tenant must pay increased rent directly to the landlord after valid notice; continued deposit of old rent in court does not prevent eviction under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act, 1972.
Man Singh v. Shamim Ahmad
A tenant must pay rent directly to the landlord after notice expressing willingness to accept rent, and failure to do so justifies eviction despite prior deposits in Court.
MIB v. Medium Broadcasting Limited
The Supreme Court upheld the revocation of a TV channel's license due to non-grant of mandatory security clearance, balancing national security with procedural fairness and press freedom.
Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that security clearance is a condition for renewal of broadcasting permissions and that natural justice principles apply even in national security matters, requiring a proportionality-based balance between fair hearing rights and security concerns.
Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that security clearance is mandatory for license renewal of TV channels, but denial must comply with natural justice and be subject to limited judicial review balancing national security and fundamental rights.
73756be913ee4525431c4244f8e5f57800c4ed45e0426cc3ce08b79d23782c8e
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, affirming limited judicial review over administrative permissions under the Act while emphasizing procedural fairness and environmental protection.
Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that security clearance is a mandatory condition for renewal of broadcasting permissions and that principles of natural justice apply subject to national security, granting interim relief to MBL against revocation of its license.
Naresh Agrawal v. Rajesh Narang
The Delhi High Court directed reference of a rent agreement dispute to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to the existence of a valid arbitration clause and non-response by the respondent.
Aklash Bijoybagai v. Rajlil Choudhury
The court held that under Section 156(3) CrPC, magistrates may direct police investigation without probing complaint veracity, but must exercise judicial prudence to prevent abuse, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Prasprabal Ali v. Ujjain Nagar Nigam
The Supreme Court held that a provisional liquidator is not liable to guarantee the quality or condition of company assets sold during liquidation, which are sold on an 'as is where is' basis under the Companies Act, 1956.
Prasprabal Ali v. Ujjain Nagar Nigam
The Supreme Court held that possession of company property on an 'as is where is' basis does not entitle adjustment of dues without formal transfer and clear title under the Companies Act, 1956.
Tamil Nadu Government v. R. Thamaraiselvam
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of Tamil Nadu government orders establishing special land encroachment tribunals for lack of statutory authority, emphasizing the need for clear legislative backing to prevent arbitrary exercise of power.
Mahesh Shantilal Parekh v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, holding that the dispute was civil in nature lacking essential criminal ingredients, and prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Anil Jaisinghani & Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arrest and detention of petitioners, holding that they were produced before the Magistrate within the mandated 24-hour period, and no violation of constitutional or procedural safeguards occurred.
Nitin Baban Dethe & Ors. v. Devendra Deoram Shirsath & Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation in a motor accident claim by holding the deceased's age as 48 years, awarding future prospects and adequate consortium amount in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Mr. Shoaib Richie Sequeira v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court directed transfer of investigation into large-scale economic offences involving Jai Corp Ltd to the CBI and SFIO to ensure a fair and impartial probe under its writ jurisdiction.
The State of Gujarat & Ors. v. H. B. Kapadia Education Trust & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that minority educational institutions receiving government aid must comply with the Grant-in-Aid Code's age of superannuation rules, and refusal to grant aid beyond prescribed age does not violate Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
NHPC Ltd. v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Himachal Pradesh Passengers and Goods Taxation Act, 1955 as amended in 1997, holding that the Legislature validly removed the basis of a prior judgment and that free transport of employees and their children is taxable under the amended Act.
chol1392023 35beb929
The court disposed of applications seeking to set aside an order rejecting matters for non-compliance as infructuous following the recall of notices on which the rejection was based.