Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Purandhar Technical Education Society v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court allowed withdrawal of a mistaken fresh registration application under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, holding the existing valid registration subsists and the rejection order is inconsequential.
Prakashkumar Mansukhlal Shah v. Smt. Sunita Anant Mehta
The Bombay High Court dismissed the probate petition for a Will due to failure to prove due execution and attestation as required by law, emphasizing the necessity of attesting witnesses' evidence and the clean hands doctrine.
Salim Alimahomed Porbanderwalla & Shivranjani Properties LLP v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that the State cannot charge premium on land within the ceiling limit under the repealed ULC Act and directed removal of revenue entries against surplus vacant land after full premium payment, interpreting the 2019 Government Resolution in a constitutionally valid manner.
Indo Nippon Chemical Co. Ltd v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
The Bombay High Court upheld MMRDA's authority to implement Mumbai Metro Line 4 and validated land acquisition under the MRTP Act, dismissing petitions challenging alignment and procedural compliance.
Mr. Akshay Anant Matkar and Mr. Satish Ramchandra Botalji v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR under the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act against operators of an online skill-based game, holding that the game is predominantly skill and not gambling.
Mohd. Nawaz Iqbal Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Salman Khan and his bodyguard for offences under Sections 504 and 506 IPC due to lack of essential ingredients and non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Section 200 Cr.P.C.
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Inspira IT Products Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld the arbitral award directing TCS to pay Inspira for undelivered servers, rejecting TCS's claim of contract termination by efflux of time and breach by Inspira, and affirmed the deduction for non-provided support.
ATS Township Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1) Delhi & Ors
Delhi High Court held reassessment notices for AY 2014-15 issued beyond six years without proper handover of seized material are barred by limitation and quashed the notices and order.
Shweta Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of satisfaction and handover of seized material by the AO of the searched person are invalid, setting aside a Section 148 notice for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Mahender Kumar Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 read with Section 153C issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of handover of seized material are invalid, setting aside a notice issued for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Kamlesh Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of handover of seized material are invalid, setting aside the notice for AY 2015-16 as barred by limitation.
Pankaj Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices under Section 148 issued beyond the prescribed limitation period computed from the date of satisfaction and handover of seized material under Section 153C are invalid and quashed the notice issued for AY 2015-16.
Kent RO Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Pushpendra Yadav & Ors
The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum correcting a typographical error in its earlier judgment regarding the description of design features.
Kanta Devi & Anr. v. Director of Industries Govt of Orissa & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a son is not barred from compassionate appointment if the spouse does not apply, and remanded the matter for reconsideration, emphasizing the scheme's objective to alleviate financial distress.
Ranveer Singh Chauhan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the respondents complied with disability reservation orders and that the petitioner was not eligible for promotion due to insufficient service, dismissing the writ petition accordingly.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order exempting surplus arising from transfer of capital assets to a wholly owned subsidiary from capital gains tax under Section 47(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
OHMI INDUSTRIES ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST
The Delhi High Court held that Rule 89(4) CGST Rules applies only to zero rated supplies without payment of tax and set aside the refund rejection of integrated tax paid on export of services, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.
Union of India & Anr. v. Ranjit Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the right of a visually handicapped candidate to a second opportunity for document verification in a recruitment exercise under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, dismissing the Union of India's appeal.
GAIL (India) Limited v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a garnishee order directing GAIL to pay disputed GST dues on behalf of a third party, holding that payment can only be compelled if the amount is due and payable.
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v. Vee Excel Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the validity of an old patent is not presumed and that the defendants raised a credible challenge of prior claiming and evergreening, thus denying interim injunction against manufacture and sale of Linagliptin tablets.