Supreme Court of India
15,092 judgments
Shankar Prasad v. Uttar Pradesh State
The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, sentencing him to ten years imprisonment based on the nature of the incident and evidence.
Sankath Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, modifying the sentence to ten years imprisonment.
Shankar Prasad v. Uttar Pradesh State
The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to ten years based on the evidence.
Sankath Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, reducing the sentence to ten years imprisonment.
ANURADHA BHASIN v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court held that freedom of speech and trade via the internet are fundamental rights subject to reasonable restrictions, and ordered transparency and proportionality in Jammu and Kashmir's communication shutdowns following Article 370 abrogation.
Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that offences without a minimum sentence of seven years cannot be classified as heinous offences under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and directed that such offences be treated as serious offences until the Legislature decides otherwise.
Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that offences without a minimum sentence of seven years cannot be classified as heinous offences under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and directed that such offences be treated as serious offences until the Legislature acts.
Krishna Ram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court affirmed the High Courts' constitutional jurisdiction to review Armed Forces Tribunal orders under Articles 226 and 227, declaring statutory limitations excluding such jurisdiction unconstitutional, while dismissing the appellant's service-related challenge.
Balkrishna Ram v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that appeals against single judge High Court orders relating to Armed Forces personnel are not to be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming the High Court's writ jurisdiction as part of the Constitution's basic structure.
Krishna Ram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court affirmed the High Courts' constitutional jurisdiction to exercise judicial review over Armed Forces Tribunal orders and held that appeals against single judge orders in service matters are maintainable before the High Courts.
Balkrishna Ram v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that intra-court appeals pending before a High Court against orders concerning Armed Forces personnel are not to be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming the High Court's writ jurisdiction as part of the Constitution's basic structure.
Surinder Singh Deswal v. Virender Gandhi
The Supreme Court upheld the retrospective applicability of amended Section 148 of the NI Act, affirming that non-deposit of compensation as a condition for suspension of sentence leads to vacation of suspension in cheque dishonour appeals.
Surinder Singh Deswal v. Virender Gandhi
The Supreme Court upheld the retrospective applicability of amended Section 148 NI Act empowering appellate courts to condition suspension of sentence on deposit of compensation, and affirmed vacation of suspension for non-compliance.
State of Gujarat v. Amber Builders
The Supreme Court held that the Gujarat Public Works Contract Disputes Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and set aside the High Court's interim injunction restraining the State from withholding payments.
State of Gujarat v. Amber Builders
The Supreme Court held that the Gujarat Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and set aside the High Court's interim injunction restraining the State from appropriating amounts due to the contractor.
Canara Bank v. Kameshwar Singh
The Supreme Court held that a General Manager, being higher than the Disciplinary Authority, has the power to impose disciplinary punishment under the Canara Bank Regulations and restored the remand for reconsideration of the appeal.
Canara Bank v. Kameshwar Singh
The Supreme Court held that the General Manager, being higher than the Disciplinary Authority, validly imposed compulsory retirement under bank service regulations and restored the Single Judge's order for reconsideration of the appeal.
Vidya Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that the State's forcible acquisition of land without due process or compensation violated constitutional property rights and directed payment of compensation to the appellant.
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUE & ANR. v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
The Supreme Court restored the original compensation award in a motor accident claim by rejecting contributory negligence and affirming the deceased's income and multiplier applied by the Tribunal.
M. Arumugam v. Ammaniammal
The Supreme Court held that a mother can act as natural guardian of a minor's individual share inherited from a coparcenary property, validating a release deed executed by her, and clarified that such property devolves as tenants in common under the Hindu Succession Act, not as joint family property.