Supreme Court of India

15,092 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1206 judgments found

Chhota Ahirwar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

06 Feb 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant for lack of proof of common intention under Section 34 IPC in an attempt to murder case, emphasizing that mere instigation without pre-arranged common intention is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention instigation

M/S. NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS) v. STATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT.

05 Feb 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 137

The Supreme Court held that a lease granted after inclusion of land in a wildlife sanctuary is ineffective, no damages lie without proof of deprivation, and limitation principles bar the appellant's claim, dismissing the review petition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 lease rights wildlife sanctuary damages claim

M/S. NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS) v. STATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT.

05 Feb 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition upholding that no rights could be acquired post-wildlife sanctuary notification, the second lease was ineffective, and the appellant was not entitled to damages or limitation benefits.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 lease rights wildlife sanctuary damages claim

Mohammade Yusuf v. Rajkumar

05 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide compromise decree relating to the subject matter of the suit does not require registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compromise decree registration Section 17 Registration Act adverse possession

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Shyam Kishore Singh

05 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 136
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that belated requests for correction of date of birth in service records after decades of acceptance and post-retirement are not sustainable, setting aside the High Court's orders granting such relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant date of birth correction service records delay in claim fag end of service

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Shyam Kishore Singh

05 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that belated correction of date of birth in service records after decades of acceptance is not permissible, setting aside the High Court's order granting such relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant date of birth correction service records fag end of service delay in claim

Kajal v. Jagdish Chand & Ors.

05 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation to a minor with 100% permanent disability from a motor accident, applying the multiplier method and directing interest from claim filing date and secure investment of the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 just compensation multiplier method personal injury damages

Kajal v. Jagdish Chand & Ors.

05 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor with 100% physical and mental disability from a motor accident, applying the multiplier method and directing proper investment and interest on the award under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 just compensation multiplier method attendant charges

D. Raghu v. R. Basaveswarudu

05 Feb 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that Data Entry Operators re-designated as Senior Tax Assistants under cadre restructuring are eligible for promotion to Inspector posts under the 2002 Recruitment Rules, overruling reliance on pre-restructured rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant cadre restructuring promotion eligibility Data Entry Operator Senior Tax Assistant

SHRI GOVINDA CHANDRA TIRIA v. SIBAJI CHARAN PANDA

05 Feb 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that an employee absorbed on transfer after deputation with accepted terms of junior-most seniority cannot later challenge the seniority list, setting aside the High Court's order and upholding the departmental seniority list.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority deputation absorption transfer

SHRI GOVINDA CHANDRA TIRIA v. SIBAJI CHARAN PANDA

05 Feb 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that an employee absorbed on transfer after deputation with accepted terms of junior-most seniority cannot claim seniority from deputation date, and upheld the seniority list accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority deputation absorption transfer

Mohammade Yusuf v. Rajkumar

05 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide compromise decree relating to immovable property that is the subject matter of the suit does not require registration under Section 17(2)(vi) of the Registration Act, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compromise decree registration Section 17 Registration Act adverse possession

D. Raghu v. R. Basaveswarudu

05 Feb 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that cadre restructuring effective from 19.07.2001 merged Data Entry Operators into Senior Tax Assistants, entitling them to promotion consideration under the new 2002 Recruitment Rules, invalidating exclusionary clauses favoring pre-restructured cadres.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant cadre restructuring promotion eligibility Senior Tax Assistant Data Entry Operator

M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURING PVT.LTD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

05 Feb 2020 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld that Karnataka's Industrial Policy, 1996 grants exemption only from sales tax and not purchase tax, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Policy 1996 sales tax exemption purchase tax Karnataka Sales Tax Act 1957

പപത നീൽ വാദ്തി v. മോോാസമ്മ നബെന്ന്തിയ്ി പറ്ള്ളവര്ി

04 Feb 2020 · S. ABDUL NAZEER; SANJIV KHANNA · 2020 INSC 128

The Supreme Court upheld pension benefits including increments for a retired employee under the Employees' State Insurance Act, dismissing the Union of India's appeal against the Tribunal and High Court decisions.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees' State Insurance Act pension benefits pension increments service rules

Union of India v. Rosamma Benny

04 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether appointments through LDCE constitute direct recruitment or promotion for MACP benefits, emphasizing the need to examine relevant service rules and circulars.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme MACP Limited Departmental Competitive Examination LDCE

Union of India and Another v. Rosamma Benny and Others

04 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Sanjiv Khanna

The Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether employees appointed through LDCE under promotion quota are entitled to MACP benefits counting past service.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme MACP Limited Departmental Competitive Examination LDCE

MD. ALI IMAM & ORS. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

04 Feb 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the State's retrospective cut-off date for extending pensionary benefits under the Triple Benefit Scheme to employees of deficit grant colleges, ruling it was not arbitrary or discriminatory.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Triple Benefit Scheme cut-off date retrospective amendment service conditions

MD. ALI IMAM & ORS. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

04 Feb 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the State's reasonable cut-off date for extending pensionary benefits under the Triple Benefit Scheme, dismissing claims of arbitrariness and discrimination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Triple Benefit Scheme cut-off date pensionary benefits conditions of service

Union of India v. Gopaldas Bhagwan Das

04 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld that failure to issue mandatory public notices under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act invalidates acquisition proceedings, and delay in challenging such acquisition does not cure this defect.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 4(1) notification public notice requirement delay and laches