Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Union of India and others v. Junu Gayary

26 Jul 2019 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing CBI investigation into the custodial death of Someswar Gayari, enhanced compensation to his widow, and dismissed the Union of India's appeal.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 21 custodial death Section 302 IPC CBI investigation

Sanjeev Kumar Gupta v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr

25 Jul 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that a matriculation certificate based solely on parental information cannot override credible contradictory evidence on age, rejecting the juvenility claim of the accused in a murder case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant juvenility claim matriculation certificate juvenile justice act age determination

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited

25 Jul 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that income tax assessments passed against an amalgamating company that ceased to exist post-amalgamation are void ab initio and cannot be cured as mere procedural defects.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant amalgamation income tax assessment non-existent entity Section 292B

Prashanti Medical Services & Research Foundation v. Union of India

25 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court upheld the prospective validity of sub-section (7) of Section 35AC of the Income Tax Act, disallowing deductions for assessment years from 2018-19 onwards, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the amendment.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 35AC Income Tax Act sub-section (7) insertion tax deduction prospective operation

RANJIT KUMAR HALDAR v. STATE OF SIKKIM

25 Jul 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of the appellants, holding that failure to explain facts especially within their knowledge under Section 106 of the Evidence Act and reliable identification of the dead body suffice to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 106 Indian Evidence Act burden of proof murder dead body identification

RANJIT KUMAR HALDAR v. STATE OF SIKKIM

25 Jul 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants where the prosecution proved death and concealment of the body in premises under their control, and the accused failed to explain incriminating circumstances under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 106 Indian Evidence Act burden of proof murder dead body identification

Ude Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana

25 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for abetment of suicide against accused who continuously harassed the victim, but set aside the conviction of one appellant on juvenile grounds.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC juvenile justice eve-teasing

Ude Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana

25 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of accused for abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC based on continuous harassment and humiliation of the deceased, but set aside the conviction of one appellant on juvenile grounds.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC juvenile justice eve-teasing

STATE BANK OF INDIA v. ATINDRA NATH BHATTACHARYYA

25 Jul 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that once a delinquent employee is given reasonable opportunity to defend himself in disciplinary proceedings, he is not entitled to repeated chances, and upheld the removal order for serious financial irregularities.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice opportunity of hearing show cause notice

STATE BANK OF INDIA v. ATINDRA NATH BHATTACHARYYA

25 Jul 2019 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA

The Supreme Court held that a delinquent employee who repeatedly refuses to avail opportunities of hearing is not entitled to further chances before imposition of major penalty, and set aside the High Court's direction for another hearing opportunity.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice opportunity of hearing major penalty

Madhya Pradesh Power Management Co. Ltd. v. M/s Dhar Wind Power Projects Pvt. Ltd.

25 Jul 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that the actual commissioning date of a wind power project is determined by the date of actual power injection into the grid, applying the tariff order effective from that date and directing execution of the PPA accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Wind Power Project Policy 2012 Tariff Order Commissioning certificate State Load Despatch Centre

Madhya Pradesh Power Management Co. Ltd. & Anr v. M/s Dhar Wind Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

25 Jul 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that actual commissioning date for wind power tariff is the date of power injection into the grid, applying the tariff order effective from that date and directing execution of PPA accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Wind Power Project Policy 2012 Tariff Order Commissioning certificate State Load Despatch Centre

Brahmani River Pellets Limited v. Kamachi Industries Limited

25 Jul 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the court at the agreed venue (seat) of arbitration alone has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, setting aside the Madras High Court's order and confining jurisdiction to the Orissa High Court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration seat venue of arbitration Section 11(6) Arbitration Act jurisdiction of courts

Brahmani River Pellets Limited v. Kamachi Industries Limited

25 Jul 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that where parties designate the venue of arbitration as Bhubaneswar, only the courts at Bhubaneswar have jurisdiction under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, setting aside Madras High Court's appointment of arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration venue of arbitration seat of arbitration jurisdiction

West Bengal Central School Service Commission v. Abdul Halim

24 Jul 2019 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that a part-time Certificate Course in Bengali does not meet the higher education language qualification required for appointment as Assistant Teacher, and the High Court erred in interfering with the administrative decision cancelling the candidate's selection.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant eligibility criteria Certificate Course language qualification judicial review

Vinod Bhaiyalal Jain & Ors. v. Wadhwani Parmeshwari Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd.

24 Jul 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court set aside an arbitral award due to the arbitrator's failure to disclose prior legal representation of a party, emphasizing the duty of impartiality and disclosure under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 disclosure Section 13 objection Section 34 setting aside award

Vinod Bhaiyalal Jain & Ors. v. Wadhwani Parmeshwari Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd.

24 Jul 2019 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court set aside an arbitral award due to the arbitrator's failure to disclose a conflict of interest and held that nondisclosure and non-recusal vitiate the award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 disclosure Section 13 objection Section 34 setting aside award

Randhir Kaur v. Prithvi Pal Singh & Ors.

24 Jul 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with concurrent findings of fact in a second appeal and restored the decree for specific performance of a land sale agreement executed through an authorized agent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance second appeal Section 41 Punjab Courts Act concurrent findings of fact

Peer Gulam Jilani v. Peer Gulam Naseer

24 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the nomination of a daughter’s son as Sajjadah Nashin and Mutawalli of a Dargah, interpreting the customary constitution to allow succession beyond strict hereditary male lineage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Sajjadah Nashin Mutawalli Dargah succession Zabta

Peer Gulam Jilani v. Peer Gulam Naseer

24 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court upheld the nomination of the respondent as Sajjadah Nashin and Mutawalli, ruling that succession under the Dargah's Zabta is by selection within the spiritual sect, not strictly hereditary lineage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Sajjadah Nashin Mutawalli Dargah succession Zabta interpretation