Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Bharatbhai Bhimabhai Bharwad v. State of Gujarat

30 Jul 2019 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's refusal to consider the challenge to bail grant, holding that bail and cancellation of bail applications require distinct considerations and remitted the matter for fresh hearing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. arbitrary exercise of discretion cancellation of bail

G.J. Raja v. Tejraj Surana

30 Jul 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran · 2019 INSC 838

The Supreme Court held that Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act providing for interim compensation before conviction is prospective and cannot be applied to offences committed before its insertion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 143A Negotiable Instruments Act interim compensation retrospective operation Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

G.J. Raja v. Tejraj Surana

30 Jul 2019 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act providing for interim compensation is prospective and cannot be applied to offences committed before its insertion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 143A Negotiable Instruments Act interim compensation retrospective operation Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Anil Khadkiwala v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)

30 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a second quashing application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable on new evidence of resignation prior to cheque issuance, and quashed proceedings against the appellant under Section 138 NI Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing application Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act resignation of director

ANIL KHADKIWALA v. STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI)

30 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a second quashing application under Section 482 CrPC is maintainable on new material and quashed proceedings against a director who resigned prior to issuance of dishonoured cheques.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of complaint Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act director resignation

Sunita v. State of Haryana

30 Jul 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to insufficient and contradictory circumstantial evidence, emphasizing that last seen evidence alone cannot sustain conviction without a complete chain of circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act

Sunita v. State of Haryana

30 Jul 2019 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and failure to establish a complete chain of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act

Vijay Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh

30 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant under the NDPS Act due to failure of the prosecution to conclusively link the seized narcotic sample to him and non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 50 compliance search and seizure narcotic drugs

Rupa Roy v. The New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

29 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor's permanent disability in a motor accident case, holding that appellate courts must assign reasons and properly appreciate evidence while deciding appeals under the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 173 Compensation

Rupa Roy v. The New India Assurance Company Ltd.

29 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor's 70% permanent disability in a motor accident case, holding that appellate courts must assign reasons and properly appreciate evidence under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 173 Compensation

Maharashtra Chess Association v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Jul 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a private agreement conferring exclusive jurisdiction on certain courts cannot oust the discretionary writ jurisdiction of a High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction private agreement exclusive jurisdiction clause

Rathin Ghosh v. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.

29 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal and unauthorized pension penalties imposed on an employee, treating his resignation as voluntary retirement with benefits, emphasizing proportionality and jurisdictional limits in disciplinary actions.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings proportionality of punishment permanent withholding of pension forfeiture of gratuity

Rathin Ghosh v. West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.

29 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court set aside the dismissal and illegal punishments imposed on a government engineer, treating his resignation as voluntary retirement and directing payment of retirement benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings misconduct proportionality of punishment withholding pension

Rajasthan Housing Board v. Roshan Lal Saini

29 Jul 2019 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; Sanjiv Khanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an employee cannot face two dismissal orders simultaneously and set aside the second dismissal while upholding the first, directing disciplinary proceedings on other charges to be kept in abeyance pending outcome of challenge to the initial dismissal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant dismissal from service disciplinary inquiry wilful absence embezzlement charges

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority v. Prestige Estates Project Ltd.

29 Jul 2019 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that development charges must be levied at rates prevailing on the date of grant of planning permission, not on the date of application or payment, allowing revised Premium FSI charges but upholding earlier I & A charges.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant planning permission development charges Infrastructure and Amenities charges Premium Floor Space Index charges

Krishna Kumar Rawat v. Union of India

29 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a pre-emptive purchase order under the Income Tax Act, affirming the valuation methodology and limiting judicial review, while remanding refund disbursement issues to the appropriate authority.

property appeal_dismissed Significant pre-emptive purchase Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UD market value

Mauji Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

29 Jul 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders for accused in a murder case, holding that bail must be granted only after assigning reasons and considering the seriousness of the offence and antecedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 302 IPC jurisdictional error reasons for bail

Shamsher Singh v. Lt. Col. Nahar Singh

29 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha · 2019 INSC 820

The Supreme Court held that under amended Order XXI CPC, restoration of possession in execution proceedings requires proof of right, title or interest, not mere prior possession, and set aside the High Court's order restoring possession without such proof.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI CPC Execution proceedings Restoration of possession Adverse possession

Shamsher Singh & Anr v. Lt. Col. Nahar Singh (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors.

29 Jul 2019 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that under amended Order XXI CPC, restoration of possession in execution proceedings requires proof of right, title or interest, not mere prior possession, and set aside the High Court's order restoring possession without such proof.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI Rules 98, 99, 100 CPC adverse possession execution proceedings restoration of possession

Union of India and others v. Junu Gayary

26 Jul 2019 · M.R. Shah; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing CBI investigation into the custodial death of Someswar Gayari by army personnel, enhanced compensation to the widow, and mandated expeditious trial procedures.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant custodial death Article 21 Section 302 IPC CBI investigation