High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. SAR Parivahan Pvt. Ltd.

13 Jun 2024 · Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award relying on an unproved valuation report, holding it a patent illegality and granted an unconditional stay of the award.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Valuation Report Patent Illegality Section 34 Arbitration Act

Jayant Maniklal Lunawat v. Sunil Mohan Balwadkar and Others

13 Jun 2024 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's appeal seeking decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC due to absence of clear admissions by Defendants, directing trial on merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admission civil revision application permanent injunction

Pawankumar Nandkishor Singh v. The State of Maharashtra

13 Jun 2024 · Avinash G. Gharote
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court upheld the disqualification of a Managing Committee member of a Cooperative Housing Society for having more than two children under Section 154B-23 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Section 154B-23 disqualification Managing Committee member

Patil Samgonda Namgonda v. The State of Maharashtra

12 Jun 2024 · Gauri Godse

The High Court held that withdrawal of earlier appeals under the MEPS Act did not amount to abandonment, allowing the petitioner’s appeal for reinstatement with back wages after illegal termination.

labor appeal_allowed Significant MEPS Act Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC withdrawal of appeal abandonment of claim

Satish Sahebrao More v. The District Collector, Nashik & Ors.

12 Jun 2024 · M.S. Sonak; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court directed the Maharashtra Government to consider objections and take an expeditious final decision on converting Pimpalgaon Baswant Gram Panchayat into a Municipal Council under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

administrative petition_allowed Significant writ of mandamus municipal council conversion Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act 1965 Section 3 notification

Ranjitsingh Dhanvindersingh Bindra v. Union of India

12 Jun 2024 · Revati Mohite Dere; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court quashed a Look Out Circular issued against the petitioner in a PMLA case due to non-compliance with mandatory periodic review requirements, despite the pendency of the case and the petitioner’s compliance with bail conditions.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Look Out Circular Prevention of Money Laundering Act periodic review bail conditions

Sushil Kumar Srivastava v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

12 Jun 2024 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court quashed the stigmatic termination of a probationary Airport Director without departmental inquiry, reinstating him with continuity and partial back wages.

labor petition_allowed Significant probationer stigmatic termination departmental inquiry natural justice

Karvy Innotech Limited v. State of Maharashtra

11 Jun 2024 · K.R. Shriram; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court quashed a VAT assessment order passed beyond the four-year limitation period under Section 23(2) of the MVAT Act, holding such orders invalid and without jurisdiction.

tax petition_allowed Significant Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 Section 23(2) limitation period assessment order

ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd. v. Union of India

11 Jun 2024 · K.R. Shriram; Jitendra Jain · 2022 (11) TMI 709 (Bom)

The Bombay High Court quashed two delayed show cause notices due to non-communication of their transfer to call book, holding such delay and procedural lapses violate natural justice and render proceedings void.

administrative petition_allowed Significant show cause notice delay in adjudication call book natural justice

Nilesh Anand Pawar v. The State of Maharashtra

11 Jun 2024 · A. S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the appellants' application to drop M.C.O.C. Act charges, affirming that membership and participation in an organised crime syndicate justify application of the Act regardless of individual prior offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act organised crime syndicate continuing unlawful activity Section 307 IPC

Satish Ramji Chaurasiya v. The State of Maharashtra

11 Jun 2024 · Bharati Dangre; Manjusha Deshpande
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court directed premature release of a life convict who completed the minimum imprisonment period under State remission guidelines, holding that the State cannot arbitrarily refuse release once the prescribed term is served.

criminal petition_allowed Significant premature release life imprisonment Section 432 CrPC Section 433-A CrPC

Trimurti Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha Limited v. The Additional Commissioner

11 Jun 2024 · Gauri Godse

The court held that resumption of land for breach of tenancy conditions must be timely, upheld breach of regrant conditions requiring payment of Nazrana, and allowed the petitioner to regularize by quantifying and paying the amount before confirming resumption.

property petition_allowed Significant Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act Section 63 order of regrant Nazrana

Jaydeep Dilip Taware v. The State of Maharashtra & Rohini Raviraj Taware

11 Jun 2024 · A. S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of police exoneration reports, modified the order to delete direction to submit charge-sheet, and transferred investigation to CID for a fair probe into alleged conspiracy and firing involving the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 169 Cr.P.C. charge-sheet investigation MCOC Act

Mr. Mohan @ Machindra Shankar Mandale v. The State of Maharashtra

11 Jun 2024 · A. S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and granted him benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt circumstantial evidence ocular evidence child witness

Razi Ahmed Khan v. The State of Maharashtra

11 Jun 2024 · A. S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court dismissed bail appeals of PFI members charged with conspiracy to wage war against the Government of India under Section 121-A IPC and UAP Act, holding that strong prima facie evidence justified denial of bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 121-A IPC Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Conspiracy Bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Somsay Dalasay Madvi & Ors. v. National Investigation Agency & Ors.

11 Jun 2024 · A. S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court held that prosecution under the M.C.O.C. Act requires prior approval based on cognizance taken by the court on the date of offence, and set aside charges under the Act due to non-compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act prior approval Section 3 M.C.O.C. Act cognizance

Ashwinkumar Suresh Pardeshi v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd

11 Jun 2024 · M.S. Sonak; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court held that abandonment of a provisional selection process without adherence to natural justice is impermissible and directed the respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation within a stipulated time.

administrative petition_allowed Significant natural justice fair play selection process retail outlet dealership

Helbon Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Ferral Anant Machinery Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd.

10 Jun 2024 · Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court held that a bona fide sale agreement executed by a company in liquidation after the winding up petition but before the winding up order is valid and binding under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, and protected the purchaser's possession against the Official Liquidator.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 536(2) Companies Act, 1956 winding up petition bona fide purchaser sale agreement validity

Priya R. Soparkar v. Vidharbha Irrigation Development Corporation

10 Jun 2024 · Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court held that its Original Side Rules and Letters Patent prevail over the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, allowing condonation of delay beyond 120 days for filing written statements in original side commercial suits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Bombay High Court Original Side Rules Letters Patent Section 129 CPC

Rikin Ranchhodlal Chokshi v. Shaila Abhay Shah

10 Jun 2024 · Manish Pitale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted probate of a Will relying on affidavit evidence under Rule 384, rejecting forgery and suspicious circumstance claims where the opponent accepted benefits under the Will and failed to discharge the burden of proof.

civil appeal_allowed Significant probate Will execution Rule 384 Bombay High Court Rules Section 69 Indian Evidence Act