High Court of Bombay
5,131 judgments
Anudan Properties Private Ltd. v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region, Slum Rehabilitation Authority
The Bombay High Court held that the SRA’s power to remove a defaulting developer under the Slum Act survives insolvency resolution and upheld termination of the petitioner despite an approved IBC resolution plan.
Mahesh K. Mehta v. The Bharatiya Friend’s Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.
The High Court dismissed the review petition against its order refusing writ relief against a Co-operative Housing Society, holding the order final and no error apparent to justify review.
Dr. Kirtikumar Sankleshwar Trivedi v. State of Maharashtra
The High Court allowed discharge of doctors accused in the death of a minor during egg donation procedures, holding insufficient grounds to proceed and applying parity with similarly discharged accused.
Abasaheb Anandrao Patil v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission's order imposing compensation and departmental enquiry on a police officer for failure to afford him notice and hearing, remitting the matter for fresh consideration.
Bhavesh P. Bhinde v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the legality of the petitioner's arrest and detention, holding that all constitutional and procedural safeguards were complied with, and dismissed the petition challenging the arrest.
Jayesh Dinesh Kadam and Anr. v. Andrew David Fernandes and Ors.
The Bombay High Court allowed revision to dismiss a suit challenging vintage registered sale deeds as barred by limitation and lacking cause of action, emphasizing rejection of vexatious claims at the threshold.
Dr. Kirtikumar Sankleshwar Trivedi v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court allowed discharge of doctors accused in the death of a minor during egg donation procedures, holding no sufficient grounds existed to proceed against them and applying parity with a previously discharged co-accused.
M/s. Shrinath Cotfab & Ors. v. The Authorised Officer, Canara Bank & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld the DRAT order requiring pre-deposit based on the entire outstanding debt under SARFAESI Act when the challenge is to Section 13(4) measures, dismissing the petitioners' plea to limit it to the auction sale price.
Invest Assets Securitisations & Reconstruction Private Limited v. Bank of Baroda
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an auction sale for non-compliance with Regulation 37(1) of the Debts Recovery Tribunal Regulations, holding that the assignee waived the mandatory procedural requirement by failing to raise timely objections.
Sachin Manohar Khambe v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the State Government’s categorization of a convict serving concurrent life sentences under stricter remission guidelines, ruling that concurrent sentences under Section 427(2) CrPC justify applying the 2010 remission policy requiring 30 years imprisonment including remission.
Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd v. Purnanadu Shekharmal Jain
The Bombay High Court held that the SARFAESI Act provisions override the MPID Act in respect of properties mortgaged prior to attachment, quashing the MPID attachment to uphold the secured creditor’s rights.
Amrapali Sakharam Kamble v. The District Collector
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a No-Confidence motion against a Gram Panchayat Sarpanch, ruling that procedural compliance and the majority’s will must be respected, and dismissed the petitioner’s challenge under Articles 226 and 227.
The Municipal Commissioner Pune Municipal Corporation v. Ms Safia Abdul Salam Shaikh
The Bombay High Court held that the Maharashtra State Minorities Commission lacks jurisdiction to pass binding orders on employment promotions, quashing its order directing retrospective promotion and benefits.
Shree Machhi Mahajan v. The Collector
The High Court quashed an order deleting a society's name from land records for violation of natural justice, directing fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner.
Riyaz Ismail Machhiwala & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
The Bombay High Court held that the one-time premium under the 2019 and 2021 Government Resolutions can only be charged on exempted surplus vacant land under Section 20 of the ULC Act, directing refund of excess premium paid on the entire land.
Gandharva Dhaneshwar Patil v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that the Collector is not mandatorily required to refer disputes under Section 76 of the Land Acquisition Act and dismissed the petition challenging refusal to refer compensation dispute to the Authority.
Dashrath Shiva Korlekar v. Devendra Murari Korlekar & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that amendments to pleadings after evidence closure require due diligence and cannot be allowed to expand the suit's scope or parties known at inception, quashing the trial court's order permitting such amendment at final arguments stage.
Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt. Ltd. v. Shashi Mehra HUF
The Bombay High Court upheld arbitral awards holding that authorized trades confirmed by the investor cannot be disowned to claim refund of brokerage, dismissing the petition challenging refund direction.
Eka Academy Private Limited v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that a written admission of tax liability before the SVLDRS cut-off date constitutes quantification, quashing the rejection of the petitioner’s declaration and directing fresh consideration.
Shri Madhukar Mahadev Patil v. Sangli Zilla Madhyawarti Sahakari Bank Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that Cooperative Courts lack jurisdiction over service disputes between cooperative societies and employees under Section 91 of the MCS Act, dismissed the petitioner's dispute, and allowed filing a civil suit with limitation protection.