High Court of Bombay
5,131 judgments
Jayesh Tanna v. Radha Arakkal & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld that a registered agreement for sale cannot be orally modified and the promoter must refund the amount with interest for failure to deliver possession by the agreed date under Section 18 of RERA.
Ved Prakash Ahuja v. Roma Prakash Ahuja
The High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Trial Court to summon the Income Tax Department to provide the mandatory Section 65-B certificate for electronic Income Tax records, holding that failure to do so was a non-application of mind.
The Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Federation Ltd. v. Bhagyashree Pravin Kulkarni
The Bombay High Court set aside the Industrial Court's additional interim order directing payment of wages and increments to a daily wage employee, holding that such relief cannot be granted during pendency of the complaint when an earlier status quo order is in force.
Rajmachi Rural Aid and Development Programme v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court directed the Collector to decide whether disputed land vested as private forest under the Maharashtra Private Forest Act, holding that procedural defects in notices do not automatically invalidate vesting and that factual disputes must be resolved by the competent authority.
Trimbak Joma Thakur and others v. Principal Secretary Urban Development Department and others
The Bombay High Court directed CIDCO to deposit enhanced land acquisition compensation with interest as per a final court decree, rejecting claims of financial inability and pendency of review petitions, holding that selective payment violates constitutional equality and writ jurisdiction is maintainable to enforce such rights.
Ganesh Anmappa Talwar v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on reliable child witness testimony corroborated by neighbors and medical evidence, rejecting claims of delay and tutoring.
Iqbal Ahmed Kallan Khan v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to irreconcilable inconsistencies in multiple dying declarations, giving precedence to the earliest medical officer's statement indicating suicide.
Nauman Suleman Khan v. State of Maharashtra & Tanvi Amardas Bhalla
The Bombay High Court quashed a sexual offence FIR under IPC and POCSO Act upon settlement and mutual marriage undertaking by the now-major victim and accused.
Sharvari Vishwas Magdum v. The Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti
The Bombay High Court held that denial of admission to Class-VI based on a hyper-technical reading of Navodaya Vidyalaya Scheme was unjustified as it violated the statutory right to education under the RTE Act, directing admission of the petitioners.
Sandeep Omprakash Singh & Ajay Keshav Singh v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court acquitted accused persons of kidnapping and ransom charges under section 364A IPC due to failure of prosecution to prove essential ingredients beyond reasonable doubt amid material contradictions.
The Special Land Acquisition Officer v. M/s. Indrayani Holding and Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court upheld the Reference Court's enhanced compensation for land acquired from Village Savroli, affirming that market value must consider all relevant factors including potential commercial and industrial use.
Bhavani Gems Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court quashed the reopening notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15, holding that mere change of opinion without failure to disclose material facts does not justify reopening assessment beyond four years.
Kiran Nanik Motwane & Anr. v. Uday Indukumar Jasani & Ors.
The court upheld the Municipal Commissioner's discretionary approval of revised building plans with condoned open space deficiencies and dismissed the plaintiffs' suit challenging construction on adjacent plot for non-compliance and maintainability issues.
Union of India v. Mr. Shahid Hussain
The Bombay High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to a passenger injured due to accidental fall from a train, holding that absence of ticket and negligence do not bar compensation without proof of intentional self-inflicted injury.
Mrs. Jagruti Rajesh Shah v. M/s. Mahek Developers & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of temporary injunction, holding that non-parties to the suit agreement cannot be compelled under MOFA and that the agreement was not enforceable as a concluded contract.
Union of India v. Mr. Shahit Hussain
The Bombay High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to a passenger injured due to accidental fall from a running train, holding that absence of ticket does not negate bonafide passenger status and negligence without intention does not bar compensation.
Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency
The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking house arrest for an elderly undertrial accused in a serious UAPA case, holding that the gravity of the offences and prima facie evidence preclude such relief, while directing jail authorities to ensure medical care and the trial court to address detention grievances.
Ramrao Kashinath Rathod v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of pre-arrest bail for offences under the SC and ST Act, ruling that absence of accused's caste in the FIR does not bar prosecution and prima facie offences were made out.
Mystical Techplast Pvt. Ltd v. The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd
The Bombay High Court held that a Letter of Acceptance conditioned on government approval does not constitute a concluded contract until such approval is obtained, and cancellation of the tender process under such circumstances is lawful.
Teerth Developers and Teerth Realties JV (AOP) v. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/ Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court quashed an income tax assessment order passed without issuing the mandatory show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order under Section 144B, holding such non-compliance violates natural justice and renders the order illegal.