High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

All India IDBI Officers Association v. Union of India

20 Sep 2022 · Dipankar Datta; M. S. Karnik
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that IDBI Ltd. is not a "State" under Article 12 of the Constitution and thus not amenable to writ jurisdiction, dismissing petitions challenging pension scheme and retirement age.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India State definition Government company IDBI Ltd.

Rosmerta Technologies Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra

20 Sep 2022 · Dipankar Datta, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.

The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of stringent eligibility criteria in a government tender for DL/RC smart cards, emphasizing limited judicial interference unless arbitrariness or mala fide is shown, while directing procedural compliance for insufficient qualified bidders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender conditions eligibility criteria judicial review Article 14

Yogesh Subhash Panchal v. Mohd. Hussain Malik & Ors.

19 Sep 2022 · Anuja Prabhudessai

The Bombay High Court enhanced compensation for a paraplegic motor accident victim, holding the dumper driver negligent and clarifying principles for assessing just compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Permanent disability Paraplegia

Imranali Babuali Sayyed v. The State of Maharashtra

19 Sep 2022 · A.S. Gadkari; Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-II IPC, applying Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC for grave and sudden provocation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-II IPC Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC grave and sudden provocation

Vitthal Pandurang Kumbhar v. Kolhapur Municipal Corporation

19 Sep 2022 · M. S. Karnik

The Bombay High Court held that a municipal employee’s prior daily wage service need not be on the same post as the permanent post to count half of that service for pension benefits under Regulation 7 of the Pension Regulations.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Pension Regulations daily wager service permanent lien Kolhapur Municipal Corporation

The Indian Express (P) Ltd. & Ors. v. Dinesh Rane & Ors.

19 Sep 2022 · Sandeep V. Marne

The High Court set aside an Industrial Court's interim order restraining employer from terminating or transferring employees without due process, affirming employer's inherent rights absent imminent threat or mala fide.

labor appeal_allowed Significant unfair labour practices interim relief employer rights disciplinary action

wp53822021 b36a09c2

16 Sep 2022 · Nitin Jamdar; N.R. Borkar

The Bombay High Court extended the returnable date and continued ad-interim orders in two criminal writ petitions due to non-issuance of notice.

criminal other Procedural criminal writ petition notice returnable date ad-interim order

Rafiq Ahmed Saeed Qureshi v. Malegaon Municipal Corporation & Ors.

16 Sep 2022 · R.D. Dhanuka; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court held that failure to complete land acquisition within the statutory period causes lapse of reservation under the MRTP Act and directed interim compensation for land used for public road under the Act of 2013.

property appeal_allowed Significant MRTP Act purchase notice reservation lapse land acquisition

Nitin Bharat Savale v. State of Maharashtra

16 Sep 2022 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of a delayed application for enhanced compensation under section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, holding that the three-month limitation period runs from the date of the reference court's award and cannot be extended based on knowledge or personal hardship.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 28A Enhanced compensation Limitation period

Agisilaos Demetriades v. The Union of India

15 Sep 2022 · Revati Mohite Dere; Prithviraj K. Chavan

The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order under the PITNDPS Act for failure to communicate grounds of detention in a language understood by the foreign national detainee, emphasizing strict compliance with Article 22(5) safeguards.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention Article 22(5) Constitution of India communication of grounds translation of detention grounds

Kailas Haribhau Warhe v. State of Maharashtra

15 Sep 2022 · M.S. Sonak; N.R. Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for double murder based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, rejecting challenges on contradictions, motive, and procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Eyewitness testimony Motive Benefit of doubt Section 34 IPC

Shankar Pandurang Waghere v. The State of Maharashtra

15 Sep 2022 · Sarang V. Kotwal

The Bombay High Court acquitted a Talathi accused of bribery under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to material omissions in prosecution evidence and a probable defence, granting benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act bribery

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. Union of India

15 Sep 2022 · K.R. Shriram; A.S. Doctor
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that interest and penalty cannot be imposed on surcharge, additional duty equal to excise duty, and special additional duty under customs laws without explicit statutory authority, setting aside such impositions by the Settlement Commission.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Finance Act, 2000 Customs Act, 1962 interest on delayed payment

M/s. Magnum Opus IT Consulting Private Limited v. M/s. Artcad Systems

14 Sep 2022 · Anuja Prabhudessai

The Bombay High Court held that the District Court has jurisdiction under Section 29-A of the Arbitration Act to substitute an arbitrator in MSMED Act arbitration proceedings and dismissed the writ petition challenging such substitution.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 29-A Arbitration and Conciliation Act MSMED Act arbitration jurisdiction of District Court substitution of arbitrator

Yogesh Mahadev Dabhade v. The State of Maharashtra

14 Sep 2022 · M.S. Sonak; N.R. Borkar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, applying Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC in a case of death caused in a sudden fight without premeditation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC sudden fight

Prakash Balasaheb Chavan v. Anand Raju Koppella

14 Sep 2022 · A.S. Gadkari; Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court allowed a one-day extension for compliance with a consent order due to bona fide bank system failure, affirming the Court's inherent power to enlarge time even without the other party's consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant consent order extension of time enlargement of time partnership firm

Popat Bajirao Kotwal v. State of Maharashtra

13 Sep 2022 · Sarang V. Kotwal

The High Court partly allowed the appeal, convicting Appellant No.1 under section 307 IPC for attempt to murder and Appellant No.2 under section 324 IPC for causing minor injuries, modifying sentences accordingly.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Attempt to murder Common intention Grievous injury Ocular evidence

Ramu @ Ramdas Rupaji Bhavar v. The State of Maharashtra

13 Sep 2022 · A. S. Gadkari; Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding the killing occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder

Kishor Manohar Kamble & Meghraj Uttam Nimbalkar v. Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors.

13 Sep 2022 · R.D. Dhanuka; M.G. Sewlikar

The Bombay High Court upheld the Pune Municipal Corporation's correction of the Ambil Odha stream alignment as a draftsman's error under the sanctioned Development Plan, dismissing the petitioners' challenge for lack of locus and non-compliance with modification procedures under the MRTP Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 Development Plan Town Planning Scheme Draftsman's error

M/s. Sanghvi Erectors Private Limited v. The State of Maharashtra

13 Sep 2022 · R. D. Dhanuka; Kamal Khata

The High Court held that failure by the Municipal Corporation to acquire land within one year of the State Government's confirmation of purchase notice results in lapse of reservation, directing the State to notify the same under the MRTP Act.

property petition_allowed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 purchase notice reservation lapse section 49(7)