High Court of Bombay
5,131 judgments
Vikram Jamnadas Kothari v. Barclays Wealth Trustees (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that the Section 11 Court's role is limited to prima facie examination of an arbitration agreement's existence and directed reference of disputes under the Escrow Agreement to arbitration, rejecting the Dosti Group's contention of abandonment.
Suruchi Rajendra Gurjar v. Board of Trustees of the Mumbai Port Authority
The Bombay High Court held that the Chairman of Mumbai Port Trust retains statutory authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner despite Ministry circulars, dismissing the writ petition challenging jurisdiction.
Sharad Vishnu Khatu v. Union of India Ministry of External Affairs
The Bombay High Court held that passport renewal cannot be denied based on incorrect police records and emphasized the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21, directing prompt verification and correction of records.
M/s. Mallak Specialities Pvt Ltd. v. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court held that repudiation of an insurance claim denying liability excludes the dispute from arbitration under the policy's arbitration clause, and refused to appoint an arbitrator.
M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that not all Time Share Companies qualify as Collective Investment Schemes under the SEBI Act and dismissed the PIL seeking blanket regulation and legislation, emphasizing SEBI's fact-specific regulatory role and the limits of judicial intervention.
Jayant Meghani & Ors. v. M/s Shree Tirupati Greenfield & Ors.
The Bombay High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that investments were loans repayable with interest, validated evidence led by a power of attorney holder, and affirmed the interest rates awarded, dismissing all challenges under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Bhimrao Jagannath Koli v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court acquitted a physically handicapped appellant of attempt to murder charges due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
D.S. Karant v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld the disciplinary charges against an IRS officer but modified the penalty to reduce him by one rank instead of two, ensuring proportionality and adherence to natural justice.
Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR and charge-sheet under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act for malafide invocation, holding that taking photos of a complaint inside a police station does not constitute spying or an offence under the Act.
Vijay Subhash Kore v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside a preventive detention order due to unreasonable delay by the detaining authority in deciding the petitioner's representation, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
Pune Municipal Corporation v. Moreshwar Ganesh Bhalerao & Pralhad Moreshwar Bhalerao
The Bombay High Court upheld the Small Causes Court's order reducing the Rateable Value of a commercial shop due to lack of proper notice and arbitrary fixation by the Municipal Corporation.
Chandulal Jorawarmal Mehta v. Mumbai Building Repair And Reconstruction Board
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a condition in redevelopment NOCs requiring reimbursement of expenses by developers, rejecting claims of double taxation and lack of statutory authority under the MHADA Act.
Awadesh Singh Yadav & Ors v Labour Enforcement Officer Dadra & Nagar Haveli & Ors
The High Court held that denial of proper representation vitiated the domestic enquiry, quashed the approval of dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, resulting in automatic reinstatement of workmen with back wages.
The Principal Commissioner of Customs (General) v. Mahavir Logistics
The Bombay High Court upheld the CESTAT's order setting aside the revocation of a Customs Broker's license on grounds of proportionality while affirming penalty and forfeiture, emphasizing judicial review of punishment under Customs Broker Licensing Regulations.
Mohammad Azad Alam Diljad Ansari v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court modified the appellant’s conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to attempt to commit culpable homicide under Section 308 IPC, reducing the sentence accordingly due to lack of requisite intention.
Chandrakant Alias Chandar Basu Chavan v. The Commissioner Of Police & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unreasonable delay in deciding the detainee's representation, affirming the constitutional right under Article 22(5) for expeditious consideration.
Sheikhah Fadiah Saad Al-Abdullah Al-Sabah v. Sanjay Mishrimal Punamiya
The Bombay High Court held that forged tenancy agreements executed after the landlord's death do not confer rights, declared the Defendants trespassers, and granted equitable relief including appointment of a Court Receiver and mesne profits to the Plaintiff.
M/s. Renaissance Global Limited v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court held that import of finished jewellery for remaking within SEZs is permitted under the SEZ Act, and Customs authorities lack jurisdiction to impose penalties or confiscate such goods under the Customs Act.
Santu Sukhdeo Jaibhave & Ors. v. Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that failure to initiate acquisition within the statutory period after a valid Purchase Notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act causes reservation of land to lapse, and a Draft Revised Development Plan not yet sanctioned cannot invalidate such notice.
Devendra Ramlal Bidlan v. Commissioner of Police Pune City & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed a preventive detention order due to unreasonable delay in considering the detainee's representation and failure to furnish vital documents, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.