High Court of Bombay
5,061 judgments
Smt. Rekha Manohar Ghansharamani & Ors. v. Janardhan Prasad Chaturvedi & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the partnership dissolved on a partner's death and the suit challenging sale agreements was barred by limitation.
Hemant Dinkar Kandlur v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that the 2014 amendment restricting capital gains exemption under Section 54(F) to properties purchased 'in India' is prospective and does not apply to investments made abroad before 1st April 2015, allowing the petitioner’s claim.
Meeti Developers Private Limited v. New Kamal Kunj Co-operative Housing Society Limited
The Bombay High Court upheld the housing society's termination of the development agreement with Meeti Developers due to defaults and refused interim relief to the developer, allowing the society to proceed with redevelopment through other means.
Undercarriage and Tractor Parts Pvt. Ltd. v. Dispute Resolution Panel – 3
The Bombay High Court held that the Dispute Resolution Panel has no jurisdiction to issue directions after the Assessing Officer passes the final assessment order, quashing the DRP's directions and consequent assessment order.
Nandu Maruti Pol v. Satishkumar Satyanarayan Agarwal
The Bombay High Court held that the executing Court erred in granting extension of time for deposit of balance consideration after an inordinate delay without sufficient explanation, and quashed the order allowing such extension in a specific performance decree execution.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik v. Balu Baburao Dhanwate; The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik v. Dadasaheb Gangadhar Shete
The Bombay High Court upheld the reinstatement of Muster Assistants terminated without statutory compliance, affirming their status as workmen entitled to protection under labour laws.
Anupam Mittal v. People Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court granted an anti-enforcement injunction restraining enforcement of a Singapore anti-suit injunction, holding that oppression and mismanagement disputes are non-arbitrable and exclusively within the NCLT's jurisdiction under Indian law.
Sakhawat Ibrahim Naik v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
The High Court held that reinstatement means restoration to the original post and directed the petitioner to be reinstated as wireman with full back wages, setting aside dismissal and Industrial Court’s order dismissing unfair labour practice complaint.
M/s. Stanship Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax
The Bombay High Court held that a person against whom a CGST detention order is passed can file an appeal even if tax and penalty are paid by another party on his behalf, and directed the appellate authority to admit and decide the appeal on merits.
Amar Shamrao Kolekar v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that detention of a bail-granted accused without lawful order is illegal and ordered his immediate release despite pending bail cancellation proceedings.
Devika Dhiraj Patil v. Dhiraj Sunil Patil
The Bombay High Court allowed the wife's application to transfer divorce proceedings from Nashik to Pune, emphasizing the wife's convenience as paramount in matrimonial transfer cases under Section 24 CPC.
Pravin Laxmidas Tanna v. Kusumben A. Kakkad
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of a 2004 Will, affirming exclusive Probate Court jurisdiction and ordering probate in favor of the plaintiff after rejecting forgery and mental incapacity claims.
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited v. Triller Inc
The Bombay High Court granted summary judgment in favour of Zee Entertainment for recovery of unpaid license fees with interest, rejecting the Defendant's plea of prematurity and non-compliance with mandatory pre-suit mediation.
Baramati Agro Ltd. v. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board & Ors.
The Bombay High Court quashed the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board’s closure order against Baramati Agro Limited for procedural lapses and failure to apply the doctrine of proportionality, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Amol Ashok Inamdar v. Bhalchandra Damodar Thakare
The Bombay High Court dismissed the revision application challenging eviction of tenants on the ground of landlord’s bonafide and reasonable requirement, upholding the validity of a consent decree partition and concurrent findings of lower courts.
Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a draft modification notification not finally sanctioned cannot override existing Development Control Regulations or binding judicial rulings, and directed the MCGM to allow the petitioner to adjust DP Road reservation against amenity space as per settled law.
Sinochem India Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs
The Bombay High Court held that amendment of Bill of Entry GSTIN details post-clearance is permissible under Section 149 of the Customs Act if documentary evidence existed at clearance, and Customs officers cannot reject such amendment by applying GST law provisions extraneous to the Customs Act.
M/s. CWT India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(2)(1)
The Bombay High Court held that failure to issue a mandatory draft assessment order under Section 144C(1) of the Income-tax Act renders the final assessment order without jurisdiction and quashed the impugned orders accordingly.
World Crest Advisors LLP v. Catalyst Trusteeship Limited & Ors.
The Court held that a pledgee holds only a special interest in pledged shares without ownership or voting rights, and where the underlying loan transaction is vitiated by fraud, the pledge is void ab initio, but declined interim relief restraining the pledgee’s exercise of rights pending final adjudication.
Ashok Commercial Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Taxation
The Bombay High Court held that assessment orders under Section 153C read with Section 144 without issuance of mandatory notice under Section 143(2) and without a DIN are invalid, and jurisdiction to reassess under Section 153C requires incriminating material found during search.