Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Vijay Kumar Bansal v. Bhimsen Bansal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition for failure to plead material facts establishing joint ownership, holding that properties held in defendants' names are presumed owned by them under the Benami Act.
Rajiv Channa v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court quashed the PMLA complaint and proceedings against the petitioner as the co-accused was acquitted in the predicate scheduled offence, holding that PMLA prosecution cannot survive without a subsisting scheduled offence.
Col Vinod Dahiya v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an APAR initiated and reviewed by the same officer without endorsement by the Accepting Officer violates DoP&T rules and is invalid, quashing the petitioner’s e-APAR for the relevant period.
Yogendra Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's framing of charges against an Income Tax officer for alleged bribery, holding that sufficient prima facie evidence existed and electronic evidence without section 65B certificate is admissible at the charge framing stage.
Jeevan Kumar v. Dy. Director Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court quashed PMLA proceedings against the petitioner following acquittal in the predicate scheduled offence, holding that no money laundering offence survives without a subsisting scheduled offence.
Rohan Chetry and Ors v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed appointment of successful candidates as Constables in CAPFs while holding claims for service benefits and seniority premature.
Harbans Kaur v. Gurmarg Appliances Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff is the rightful proprietor of the trademark 'TANASHI', cancelled the Defendant's registration obtained as a distributor without independent rights, and granted injunction restraining the Defendants from using the mark.
Union of India & Anr. v. Sushil Kohli
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing pay parity for a senior employee drawing lesser pay than juniors post cadre merger, emphasizing that such disparity constitutes an anomaly warranting stepping up of pay.
Allied Blenders and Distillers Private Limited v. Hermes Distillery Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the Defendant from using a whisky label deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's 'OFFICER'S CHOICE' label, holding that the overall similarity and acquired distinctiveness of the Plaintiff's label establish infringement and passing off.
Sarvjeet Singh v. Pranay Sahay and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for non-compliance of reinstatement and back wages directions, holding that disputed promotion claims cannot be adjudicated in contempt proceedings and no wilful disobedience was found.
N Ramaseshan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed verification of the petitioner's NOC and held that pro-rata pension must be granted from the date of discharge if eligibility is established, with arrears payable with interest.
Shakir Mohiuddin Bhat v. National Medical Commission of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a fresh application for FMGE eligibility certificate under revised NMC guidelines, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Bakshi, Navroop Singh Bakshi, Mahima Malhotra and Neetej v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Delhi High Court held that courts have the power to summon and peruse SEBI's compounding-related documents despite confidentiality regulations, ensuring fair adjudication of compounding applications under Section 24-A of the SEBI Act.
M/S Shivah Infraventure LLP v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent failed to comply with the contractual arbitration appointment timeline.
Simentech India Private Limited v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The Delhi High Court held that for pecuniary jurisdiction in arbitration petitions, the Specified Value must be calculated including interest only up to the arbitration invocation date, excluding GST not claimed, and returned the petition for lack of jurisdiction as the value fell below INR 2 crores.
Varun Wishwas v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed interim bail on medical grounds to an accused in a POCSO case, holding that adequate treatment was being provided in custody and balancing the accused's health with the minor victim's rights.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court supervised the redevelopment of Shri Kalkaji Mandir by approving demarcation, directing finalization of consultants and oversight committee, and enforcing compliance with statutory approvals and possession orders.
Manju v. Shivprasad
The Delhi High Court upheld joint guardianship and custody with the mother but modified visitation rights to supervised meetings and phone calls, prioritizing the child's welfare and preference over forced overnight visits.
Vivek Aggarwal and Anr. v. Mr. Hemant Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a one-year extension to the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that substantive challenges to the arbitrator's conduct are beyond the scope of such extension petitions.
Ravi Kapoor v. State-NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking parole of a life convict with multiple serious offences, holding that public safety and the convict’s criminal history justified denial of parole.