Delhi High Court
64,767 judgments
Vandana Yadav & Anr. v. Deepa
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction over a commercial lease dispute and dismissed the appellants' claim of ownership and rent exemption due to lack of evidence.
Jaipal Khandelwal v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the habeas corpus petition seeking production of the petitioner's missing son, directing the police to continue investigation with monthly reports and transfer the case to the Anti-Human Trafficking Unit.
Raghuvinder Singh v. Prabhakant
The High Court held that PMLA proceedings cannot be sustained if the accused is acquitted in the predicate scheduled offence, and accordingly quashed the charges against the petitioner.
Rajiv Channa v. Prabhakant, Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court held that PMLA proceedings cannot continue against an accused acquitted in the predicate scheduled offence, quashing the complaint and related proceedings against the petitioner.
Suraj v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 308 IPC based on credible injured witness testimony despite minor discrepancies and delay in FIR registration.
Geetika Dahiya v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case arising from a disputed real estate transaction amid matrimonial discord, emphasizing the absence of prima facie evidence and the civil nature of the dispute.
Anil Kumar Bharti v. Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of specific rules permitting retrospective promotion, promotion is effective only from the date granted, and the petitioner was rightly held ineligible for the LDCE based on the cutoff date fixed by the respondent.
Ram Prasad v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that an employee whose selection process was completed before 01.01.2004 but whose appointment was delayed is entitled to the Old Pension Scheme benefits despite joining after that date.
Smt. Chand Grover & Others v. M/S Mod Chits Pvt Limited & Others
The Delhi High Court allowed amendments to incorporate subsequent relinquishment deeds but disallowed impleadment of a party without ownership rights, holding that such a party is not necessary for adjudication.
Dr. Jeevan Kumar v. Prabhakant
PMLA proceedings cannot be sustained if the accused is acquitted in the predicate scheduled offence, leading to quashing of charges framed under the PMLA against the petitioner.
Union of India & Ors. v. Akhilesh Kumar Rastogi
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing pay stepping up of a senior Income Tax Officer to remove anomaly caused by junior officer receiving advance increments after clearing the same Departmental Examination later.
Sanjay Gupta v. Prabhakant Directorate of Enforcement Govt. of India
The Delhi High Court held that PMLA proceedings cannot be sustained against an accused acquitted in the predicate scheduled offence, quashing the complaint and related proceedings against the petitioner.
Bablu Mandal v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court suspended the sentence and granted bail to the appellant who had served more than half of his sentence during the pendency of his appeal under Section 389 Cr.P.C., considering discrepancies in victim age proof and the likelihood of delay in appeal disposal.
Vivek Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a notice under Sections 107/111 Cr.P.C. issued without preliminary enquiry or independent opinion by the Magistrate in a landlord-tenant dispute, reaffirming strict procedural safeguards for such preventive orders.
Vijay Kumar Bansal v. Bhimsen Bansal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition for failure to plead material facts establishing joint ownership, holding that properties held in defendants' names are presumed owned by them under the Benami Act.
Rajiv Channa v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court quashed the PMLA complaint and proceedings against the petitioner as the co-accused was acquitted in the predicate scheduled offence, holding that PMLA prosecution cannot survive without a subsisting scheduled offence.
Col Vinod Dahiya v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an APAR initiated and reviewed by the same officer without endorsement by the Accepting Officer violates DoP&T rules and is invalid, quashing the petitioner’s e-APAR for the relevant period.
Yogendra Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's framing of charges against an Income Tax officer for alleged bribery, holding that sufficient prima facie evidence existed and electronic evidence without section 65B certificate is admissible at the charge framing stage.
Jeevan Kumar v. Dy. Director Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court quashed PMLA proceedings against the petitioner following acquittal in the predicate scheduled offence, holding that no money laundering offence survives without a subsisting scheduled offence.
Rohan Chetry and Ors v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed appointment of successful candidates as Constables in CAPFs while holding claims for service benefits and seniority premature.