Delhi High Court

38,124 judgments

Year:

Hari Om Metals v. The Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Anr

11 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:359-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be based on objective satisfaction and proper reasoning, modifying the cancellation to take effect prospectively.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act 2017 show cause notice

PANKAJ PLASTIC v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

11 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:249-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction, proper Show Cause Notice with particulars, and an opportunity of hearing, setting aside the impugned retrospective cancellation order for lack of these safeguards.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act Show Cause Notice

Naresh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:191-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking disability pension, holding that the petitioner’s congenital disability was not attributable to military service and the claim was barred by inordinate delay.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension military service attributable disability congenital disease

Kiran Verma and Ors. v. The State and Anr

11 Jan 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2023 SCC OnLine SC 951

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against in-laws in a matrimonial cruelty case due to vague and non-specific allegations constituting abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial cruelty Section 498A IPC

Kiran v. Virender Kumar Jain

11 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:629

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's decree of possession under Order XII Rule 6 CPC based on unequivocal admissions of tenancy by the appellant, dismissing the appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admission landlord-tenant relationship discretionary power

Satish Kumar v. Union of India

11 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:228-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination of the petitioner for hearing impairment and disposal of his medical categorization in accordance with IRMM 2000 regulations, allowing further legal remedies if aggrieved.

administrative other medical categorization hearing impairment IRMM 2000 writ of mandamus

Preeti Anand v. State (NCT of Delhi)

11 Jan 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:257

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the applicant accused of forgery and criminal conspiracy, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and the seriousness of allegations.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC forgery criminal conspiracy

Hitesh Saini v. Union of India

11 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:229-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Medical Board's disqualification of the petitioner for being overweight, holding that absent mala fide or extraneous reasons, the Board's findings are final and no fresh medical examination is warranted.

administrative petition_dismissed Medical Board Review Medical Board overweight disqualification Inspector Librarian BSF

Twenty Five South Realty Ltd v. DLF Limited & Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:282-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a judgment disposing Section 9 petitions without hearing the appellants, directing a rehearing and allowing the majority shareholder to retain shares pending disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 9 petitions Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 shareholding dispute interim relief

INSP/GD Ankit Kumar Tyagi v. Director General ITBP

11 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:222-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to decide the petitioner's statutory pre-confirmation petition within three months, ensuring timely disposal of the matter.

administrative petition_allowed statutory pre-confirmation petition General Force Court time-bound decision administrative delay

Sunil Kumar v. The Principal District Judge and Sessions Judge HQ

11 Jan 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:325

The Delhi High Court held that an employee who completed qualifying service for financial upgradation cannot be denied retrospective benefits merely due to resignation, directing implementation of upgradation with consequential relief.

administrative petition_allowed Significant financial upgradation Lower Division Clerk Upper Division Clerk qualifying service

Lovely Pal and Anr. v. Honey Chandel Honi Pal & Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH A... · 2024:DHC:280-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that delay in filing the written statement in a partition suit cannot be condoned due to laxity and unsubstantiated claims of settlement or medical issues.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit written statement extension of time condonation of delay

Karuna Nidhan v. Rajiv Gauba & Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:286

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the respondents had complied with the Court's order on NFSG grant and that contempt jurisdiction does not extend to issuing supplementary directions.

administrative petition_dismissed Contempt of Court Non-Functional Selection Grade NFSG Compliance of Court Order

Union of India v. Mithlesh Tyagi

11 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:205-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order granting pensionary benefits for ad-hoc service rendered beyond prescribed age limits, holding such service does not qualify as pensionable under CCS Pension Rules without regularization.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant ad-hoc appointment qualifying service pensionary benefits CCS Pension Rules 1972

Thakar Dass Bhatia v. Suresh Kumar Bhatia & Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:308-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a partner's personal property mortgaged as security for a partnership firm's loan remains subject to the charge until the loan is repaid, and the court will not direct its release absent consent of borrower and mortgagor.

civil appeal_dismissed Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Section 14 equitable mortgage collateral security

Dr. Yogesh Yadav v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences & Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:244

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondents to decide expeditiously on the petitioner’s claims for higher HRA and increments under the Post Graduation Policy, while reserving further legal remedies.

administrative other writ petition mandamus Post Graduation Policy House Rent Allowance

Amit Aggarwal v. Directorate of Enforcement

11 Jan 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:235

The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Amit Aggarwal in a money laundering case involving forged foreign remittance documents, holding that the stringent conditions under Section 45 of PMLA apply and the petitioner failed to satisfy them.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 45 PMLA Section 438 CrPC

Union of India & Ors. v. Anil Kumar Sharma & Ors.

11 Jan 2024 · Rekha Palli; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:251-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the CAT order relying on a prior tribunal order and held that dismissal of the SLP leaving the question of law open does not entitle reopening of the matter.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal Special Leave Petition Article 226 non-speaking order

Rajesh Sharma v. Government Boys Senior Secondary School No. 2

11 Jan 2024 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH A... · 2024:DHC:281-DB

The Delhi High Court held that disputes over title and possession of land between private parties cannot be adjudicated by writ petition and must be resolved through civil suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction property dispute title and possession Article 226

Akash v. State of NCT of Delhi

11 Jan 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:236

The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a POCSO case who was not identified by the victim and implicated solely on co-accused statements, emphasizing the balance between accused’s rights and trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail POCSO Act sexual assault minor victim