Delhi High Court

38,124 judgments

Year:

Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute v. Nishikesh Tyagi & Another

01 Feb 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:1268

The Delhi High Court upheld that a government hospital qualifies as an industry under the Industrial Disputes Act, validated State Government referral of the dispute, and dismissed the petition challenging reinstatement of a workman with back wages.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 industry definition hospital as industry referral of industrial dispute

Rishabh Khandelwal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

01 Feb 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:735

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC on the basis of a genuine settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court’s power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and futile litigation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 406 IPC Section 420 IPC

M/S SOLANKI ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND ANR

01 Feb 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:806-DB

The Delhi High Court directed restoration of GST registration upon the petitioner’s payment of outstanding tax shortfall and interest, disposing of the petition seeking quashing of cancellation and related orders.

tax petition_allowed GST registration cancellation revocation of cancellation Electronic Credit Ledger tax liability

Ramesh Kumar Tripathi & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Feb 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:703-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrospective promotion and seniority due to inordinate delay and laches, reaffirming that stale service claims are not entertained.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant promotion seniority delay and laches Departmental Promotion Committee

M/S. BERKELEY LIFESTYLE BRANDS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S. RAJ BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED

01 Feb 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:961-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that COVID-19 was a force majeure event but did not render leased premises unfit for use, thereby affirming appellants' liability for rent and reasonable damages for breach of lock-in period.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Force majeure Lease deed COVID-19 pandemic

Chanderpal v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

01 Feb 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:1110

The Delhi High Court upheld the kidnapping conviction under Section 363 IPC, modified the sentence of appellant Chanderpal to the period already served, and abated appeals of deceased co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed kidnapping minor Section 363 IPC ossification report

Home and Soul Infratech Pvt. Ltd. v. Raj Krishna Construction Company Pvt. Ltd.

01 Feb 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:1047

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only a prima facie existence of a valid arbitration agreement is to be examined, and appointed a sole arbitrator despite the respondent's plea of novation, leaving disputed issues for the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator novation prima facie examination

MS POONAM CHUGH v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

01 Feb 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:918

The Delhi High Court directed Punjab National Bank to grant pension benefits to an employee who exercised the pension option, holding the Bank liable for transferring funds despite procedural lapses.

labor petition_allowed Significant Pension Scheme Provident Fund PF and Pension Circular No. 8/2010 Article 226

Kamal Kumar Bahari v. Moti Lal Jain LRs

01 Feb 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:685

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the tenant failed to prima facie establish ownership or grounds to contest, and the landlord demonstrated bonafide need and better title.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) eviction leave to contest

OFB Tech Private Limited v. M/S KKSPUN India Ltd

01 Feb 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:719-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the injunction restraining invocation of unconditional bank guarantees, holding that such guarantees must be honored unless clear fraud or special equities causing irretrievable injustice are established.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bank guarantee invocation interim injunction special equities

Union of India v. Renu Gupta

01 Feb 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:723-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order restoring family pension to a remarried widow with a child, holding that Rule 54(6)(i) of CCS (Pension) Rules bars such pension post-remarriage and the 2011 O.M. applies only to childless widows.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant family pension CCS (Pension) Rules 1972 Rule 54(6)(i) childless widow

Mohiet Anand v. Parul Anand

01 Feb 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:779-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a judgment debtor cannot be sent to civil imprisonment more than once for non-payment of maintenance under the same decree and set aside the Family Court's order directing repeated imprisonment without following mandatory procedural safeguards.

family appeal_allowed Significant civil imprisonment maintenance arrears Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 24 HMA

Indupal Kaur Sehgal v. Dr. Davinder Pal Singh Rekhi & Ors.

01 Feb 2024 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH A... · 2024:DHC:727-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a legal heir cannot challenge a partition decree accepted by the common ancestor and that an amendment changing the nature of a partition suit is impermissible.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of plaint legal heir

M/S State Engineers v. Pragati Power Corporation Ltd.

01 Feb 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:736

The Delhi High Court set aside a debarment order passed without prior specific notice, affirming that natural justice mandates a clear show cause notice before blacklisting or debarment in government contracts.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant debarment show cause notice natural justice blacklisting

Confederation of NCR Residents Welfare Associations v. Government of NCT of Delhi

01 Feb 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:790-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging agreements related to the DND flyover, holding that ongoing investigations and judicial proceedings preclude further directions in the matter.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation DND flyover Memorandum of Understanding Concession Agreement

DSIDC and Udyog Nagar CETP Society v. Government of NCT of Delhi

01 Feb 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh A... · 2024:DHC:789-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a government notification transferring a CETP due to non-communication of the adverse order violating natural justice and directed fresh proceedings in accordance with the CETP Act and Rules.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Common Effluent Treatment Plant CETP Act 2000 natural justice show cause notice

Continental Textiles Mills Ltd. v. Official Liquidator

01 Feb 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:690

The Delhi High Court held that a purchaser of property in liquidation on an 'as is where is' basis cannot seek court directions for removal of unauthorized occupants, as the Official Liquidator is not obliged to act post-sale.

civil petition_dismissed Significant e-auction property in liquidation unauthorized occupation Official Liquidator

Sh Tilak Raj v. Dy Conservator of Forest

01 Feb 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:768

The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner a final opportunity to pursue alternate legal remedies against eviction from land declared forest but urbanized, restraining coercive action for thirty days without deciding on merits.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Land Revenue Act dismissal in default urbanization notification Section 507(a) DMC Act

DSSSB AND ORS v. PRAVEEN KUMAR

01 Feb 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:715-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing a candidate's candidature despite a minor inadvertent error in photograph size, emphasizing reasonableness and rectification before examination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant candidature rejection photograph size requirement inadvertent error rectification before examination

Charanjeet Singh v. Vivek Jain

01 Feb 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:688

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that family members' emotional dependence and business expansion justify eviction despite tenant's claims of hardship and employment of landlord's sons.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement leave to contest