Delhi High Court

64,846 judgments

Year:

Suraj Kumar v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi

01 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:1731-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking custody of a missing girl after investigations revealed she was murdered and a criminal case was registered against the accused.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus missing person deceased custody

Reshma v. The Commissioner of Police

01 Mar 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:1694

The Delhi High Court clarified the legal meaning of 'pardanashin woman', balanced religious freedoms with police duties, and declined to mandate special police procedures for women wearing veils while emphasizing dignity and reasonableness in law enforcement.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant pardanashin woman pardah veil Article 21

BCC Developers and Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax, Delhi-South

01 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2356-DB

The Delhi High Court directed transfer of GST credit from an automatically created non-migrated GST number to the valid migrated GST number and mandated rectification of such technical errors by GST authorities.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST migration non-migrated GST number GST credit transfer automatic GST registration

Sachin Kumar Tiwari v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

01 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:1732-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition after the adult wife voluntarily appeared and chose to live with her husband, issuing protective directions against family interference.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus illegal confinement adult married woman personal liberty

Himanshu Thakur v. State of NCT of Delhi

01 Mar 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:1691
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder in communal riots, emphasizing prolonged custody, hostile eyewitnesses, and trial delays as grounds for bail despite the gravity of offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail prolonged custody eyewitness hostility parity principle

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -2, Delhi v. M/S Clix Finance India Pvt. Ltd.

01 Mar 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:1696-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's quashing of the CIT's revisionary order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the AO had applied mind and conducted adequate enquiry, thus the revision was without jurisdiction.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 263 Income Tax Act revisionary powers erroneous order prejudicial to Revenue assessment order

Parveen v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

01 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:1733-DB

The Delhi High Court directed registration of FIR against unknown persons and comprehensive investigation in a missing person case after forensic DNA analysis ruled out biological relation with the petitioner.

criminal petition_allowed DNA profiling STR analysis missing person FSL report

Sushil Yadav v. State (Govt. of NCT), Delhi

01 Mar 2024 · Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:1668
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a two-year-old child based on conclusive medical and DNA evidence despite inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act penetrative sexual assault DNA profiling medical evidence

Ramesh Chand Sharma v. Balbir Singh Mathur & Ors.

01 Mar 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:1695
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed substitution of only the sole legal heir as legal representative of the deceased defendant in a civil suit, applying limitation rules and COVID-19 extensions, and disallowed impleadment of a daughter-in-law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXII Rule 4 CPC Legal representatives Limitation Act 1963 Abatement of suit

Kudos Pharmaceuticals Limited & Ors. v. Natco Pharma Limited

01 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Kudos Pharmaceuticals against Natco Pharma for infringement of the species patent on Olaparib, holding that Natco failed to raise a credible challenge to the patent's validity at the interlocutory stage.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant interlocutory injunction patent infringement credible challenge species patent

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) -1 v. M/s Forum Sales Pvt. Ltd.

01 Mar 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:1693-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer must reject the books of account before making best judgment assessments, and additions without such rejection and proper verification are unsustainable, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 145(3) Section 144 Best judgment assessment

Bhagwan Dass v. Delhi Development Authority

01 Mar 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:1674
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that where delay in payment for a DDA flat is caused by the authority's fault in not issuing the demand letter properly, the allottee is entitled to allotment at old rates prevailing at the time of the first demand letter, not current rates.

property petition_allowed Significant demand-cum-allotment letter Delhi Development Authority LIG flat allotment delay and laches

Gaurav Gulati v. Gita Pravin

01 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:1873-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against the rejection of his divorce petition, holding that he failed to prove cruelty or desertion by the wife, who was compelled to live separately and made persistent reconciliation efforts.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cruelty desertion matrimonial dispute

Raj Kumar Moharwal v. Raj Kumari Moharwal

01 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:1915-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of mental cruelty, holding that persistent false complaints and oppressive conduct by the wife constituted cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant mental cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act false complaints

S.C. Nuna v. Anita Nuna

01 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:1872-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal seeking divorce on cruelty grounds, holding that his extramarital relationship constituted cruelty and barred him from relief under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 extramarital relationship

Abhishek Garg v. Avni Jain

01 Mar 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:1820-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs.75,000 per month to the wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding the amount reasonable and the order valid.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance Hindu Marriage Act Section 24 HMA Section 125 CrPC

Vinay Kumar HUF & Ors. v. Ajay Kumr HUF & Ors.

01 Mar 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2309

The Delhi High Court held that the 120-day limit for filing Written Statements under its Rules is absolute and cannot be extended beyond that period, dismissing defendants' appeals seeking condonation of delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Written Statement Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Delhi High Court Rules 2018 Extension of time

CINNI Foundation v. Anjan Narayan Singh & Anr.

01 Mar 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:1717

The Delhi High Court held that the copyright registration of the impugned artwork must be rectified to be in the name of the CINNI Foundation trust, leaving trusteeship disputes to civil courts.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant Copyright Act, 1957 Section 50 rectification petition trusteeship dispute

S.C. Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority

01 Mar 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:2226

The Delhi High Court set aside the DDA's lease cancellation for lack of proper notice and hearing, upheld misuse charges only for a specified area, and directed consideration of freehold conversion upon payment of dues.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease cancellation principles of natural justice show cause notice misuse charges

National Association of Software and Services Companies v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

01 Mar 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:2078-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the tax authorities acted arbitrarily by adjusting disputed tax demand against refunds without considering the petitioner's stay application under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that the 20% pre-deposit guideline is not a mandatory pre-condition and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 220(6) Income Tax Act stay of demand pre-deposit Office Memorandum 31 July 2017