Delhi High Court
44,251 judgments
Surender Kumar v. Anita Chhabra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the right to cross-examination cannot be closed prematurely and upheld the respondents' right to rely on additional documents allowed by amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC in a commercial suit.
Subhash Manchanda v. Raj Kumar Manchanda & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's suit for partition declaring his half share in the property as per the Will and relinquishment deeds, rejecting the defendants' plea of family settlement barring partition.
Amit Agarwal v. Tanuj Agarwal
The Delhi High Court granted a preliminary decree declaring the plaintiff as half owner of the property based on admitted registered sale deed, emphasizing that clear admissions in pleadings allow passing decree without full trial under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.
Om Prakash Gandhi v. Sita Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging dismissal of applications disputing ownership in labour disputes, holding that factual issues must be decided by the trial court and not in writ proceedings.
Verizon Trademark Services LLC & Ors. v. Lathiya Hanshaben Arvindbhai & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction against the use of the deceptively similar mark 'VRIZON' infringing the well-known 'VERIZON' trademarks under Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Anand Kamal Goel v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed belated applications for impleadment by parties claiming title through existing litigants in a long-pending partition and probate dispute, affirming the doctrine of lis pendens and procedural safeguards against dilatory tactics.
Pawan Kumar @ Monu v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused in a serious sexual offence case involving a minor victim forced into prostitution, holding that compromise between parties does not warrant bail in such grave matters.
Garhwal Jems and Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. v. RMI Steels Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act where the cheque was issued as security for contingent liabilities not yet arisen, holding no offence was made out.
Malwati v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the wife of a dismissed BSF employee seeking release of service benefits and pension, holding that the dismissal had attained finality due to prior withdrawal of the employee's writ petition.
Sadhna Gupta v. Saneh Kumar Mittal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Written Statements filed beyond the mandatory 120-day period from service of summons cannot be taken on record, dismissing the defendants' appeals seeking condonation of delay.
ITC Limited v. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Registrar's rejection of delayed additional evidence under Rule 53 in trademark opposition, affirming strict adherence to mandatory timelines and limited discretion for extensions.
Vikas Chaudhary & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Vishal v. Sonia
The Delhi High Court reduced the maintenance awarded to the wife, set aside automatic annual enhancement, and clarified that maintenance modification requires proof of changed circumstances under Section 127 Cr.P.C.
Birendra Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging disparity in Foreign Allowance for ITBP personnel, holding that judicial interference in executive policy decisions is limited absent mala fide or procedural violations.
Shikha Shah v. Renu Promoters Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of a Director under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonoured cheque issued with her consent, dismissing the petition to quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rakesh Kumar v. Jawaharlal Nehru University
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent university to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant after he qualified all recruitment stages but was not appointed.
Ishwar Singh v. Vidya Shri Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against the acquittal in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the presumption under Section 139 NI Act was rebutted by consistent evidence including an FSL report.
Union of India v. Rupesh Kumar Jha
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order allowing candidates' examination answer sheets to be evaluated despite their failure to sign the opening page, holding such omission a trivial error not affecting identity or merit.
Sagar Verma & Anr. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Moinuddin v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner father to take custody of his 14-month-old son while granting access rights to the maternal grandparents, emphasizing the child's welfare.