Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Smt. Murti v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for CSD and Health Card facilities and pass a reasoned order, granting liberty to challenge the decision.
Vipul Bansal & Ors. v. State Through SHO Vijay Vihar & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Ravi Shukla & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 509, 354, 354A, and 34 IPC based on amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS.
Amarjit Singh v. Punjab & Sind Bank
The Delhi High Court held that only the Competent Authority under Pension Regulations can initiate disciplinary proceedings and impose penalties on retired bank officers, quashing a charge sheet issued by an incompetent authority and setting aside the consequent penalty of withholding pension.
Devendra Khatik v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and related IPC provisions following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.
Pradeep Kumar v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition directing a fresh medical examination for a recruitment candidate declared unfit due to inconsistent chest expansion measurements taken while ill, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to medical standards.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DHARMENDER SINGH & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement, affirming that a valid arbitration clause mandates such appointment despite non-response by respondents.
Harvinder Singh & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited v. Manav Sethi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement, directing preliminary determination of jurisdictional objections including limitation.
VLCC Personal Care Limited v. M/S Uday Enterprises
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator as per the arbitration clause in the distribution agreement to adjudicate disputes between the parties, allowing the respondent to raise preliminary objections before the arbitrator.
Sujatan K. S. v. M/S Appolo Cranes Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that retrospective amendments validate jurisdiction and complaints must be adjudicated on merits despite delayed refiling.
Benetton India Private Limited v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that a duly authorized company representative can dispose of traffic challans without requiring the MD/CEO's physical presence, setting aside the trial court's unnecessary procedural directions.
Ravi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a gang rape and abetment to suicide case due to prolonged custody and lack of conclusive scientific evidence, subject to strict conditions.
M.M. Dhonchak v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging an interlocutory order rejecting preponement of hearing, holding that such orders are not appealable under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.
Khushbu Rana v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned municipal orders afresh in accordance with law.
Radhey Shyam v. Salig Ram
The Delhi High Court held that the amount deposited for the disputed 1997 monthly baari at Shri Kalkaji Mandir shall be equally divided between the two disputing groups, affirming the principle of alternate exclusive performance of baaris and directing continuation of the settled practice.
M Samundra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a CRPF personnel temporarily medically unfit but who regained SHAPE-I medical category is entitled to retrospective seniority and promotion with batchmates, setting aside orders denying such relief.
Sageer Ahmad @ Sagir Ahamad & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement and compensation to the complainant.
Ram Prasad Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS while emphasizing the nature of offence and societal impact.
Kamal Jeet Suman & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.