Delhi High Court
49,371 judgments
Purnima Roy v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of the petitioner’s alleged missing husband after official reports confirmed his natural death.
Ajay v. State and Others
The court dismissed the habeas corpus petition seeking release of the petitioner’s wife, holding that an adult woman’s voluntary choice to live with her husband precludes interference.
M/S Sunshine Caterers Private Limited v. Union of India through Ministry of Railways & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a tender bid due to failure to reflect certified information in UDIN certificates, emphasizing the mandatory role of UDIN verification in tender processes.
Geeta Anand v. Tanya Arjun & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that suits for possession or injunction filed by in-laws claiming exclusive ownership do not fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of Family Courts unless the cause of action arises directly out of the marital relationship between spouses.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Sunita Nagpal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal and upheld the Tribunal's award holding the truck driver liable for rash and negligent driving causing a fatal accident.
Radha Goyal v. Gaurav Goyal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s amendment application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for undervaluation of reliefs to evade court fees, holding it an abuse of process of law.
Electra Power Transmission Systems v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order due to procedural irregularities and remanded the matter for re-adjudication after allowing the petitioner to submit documents and appear personally.
Anandita Bhargava v. Registrar General Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court held that actual detention in judicial custody triggers the 90-day period for default bail under Section 167 CrPC, dismissing the writ petition challenging the examination answer key.
Jullundur Motor Agency Delhi Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST demand order for failure to consider detailed taxpayer replies and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity to furnish clarifications.
Amit Upadhyay v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato, Ward 45 & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for lack of proper opportunity to produce documents and directed fresh adjudication with personal hearing.
Jaquar and Company Private Limited v. Ashirvad Pipes Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction against defendant’s use of marks ARTISTRY and TIARA, holding them infringing and deceptively similar to plaintiff’s ARTIZE and TIAARA marks, rejecting defendant’s claim of descriptive prefix and Section 28(3) bar.
Shah Caters v. Jag Pravesh Chandra Hospital & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the hospital authority to decide the petitioner's representation regarding an inadvertent tender classification error before awarding the contract.
Vijay Lakshmi Sahu v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court restored interim custody of a minor child to the mother, holding that the father cannot take custody without court authorization pending final custody proceedings.
M/s Sana Food Products v. M/s Ashwmegh Spices Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of the petitioners' application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement beyond 120 days, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in light of COVID-19 and procedural facts.
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Sarla
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer cannot avoid liability for compensation merely because the driver had a fake licence, if the vehicle owner exercised due care in verifying the licence, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Vineet Goel v. Rushmi Goel
The Delhi High Court allowed belated filing of certified public documents under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC, emphasizing procedural rules serve justice and not technical defeat of substantive rights.
Gaurav Mangla & Ors. v. Rohit Mangla
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioners' applications, holding that the suit for partition is maintainable as it arises from a distinct cause of action not barred by res judicata, Order II Rule 2 CPC, or limitation.
Himanshu and Ors. v. Directorate General of Civil Aviation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging DGCA's classification of the Pipistrel aircraft as a Light Sport Aeroplane and denied interim relief, leaving substantive rights open for final adjudication.
Suresh Kumar Gupta v. Shrilata Agarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and decreed the suit in terms of a lawful settlement agreement recorded under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC following successful mediation.
M/S. GIESECKE AND DEVRIENT INDIA PVT. LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2.1 & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer must compute income strictly in conformity with the Transfer Pricing Officer's determination of Arm's Length Price and cannot make independent transfer pricing adjustments beyond the TPO's order.