Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Canara Bank v. Assistant Commissioner, DGST
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity for hearing.
KAILASH INTERNATIONAL v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication after affording opportunity of personal hearing.
Bona Vita Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. The Sales Tax Officer Class-II Avato Ward 94 Zone 8 New Delhi 110002
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for non-consideration of the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard.
Manpowergroup Services India Pvt Ltd v. The Sales Tax Officer Class-II Ward-I Zone-I Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to respond to show cause notices alleging irregular input tax credit with procedural safeguards, without adjudicating merits.
Safe Fly Aviation Services Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication after providing an opportunity of personal hearing.
CHARU OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. v. THE UNION OF INDIA REVENUE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing.
Kamlesh Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition under the 1894 Act does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken and compensation paid, and a subsequent purchaser cannot challenge such acquisition.
Sirajuddin Qureshi v. Matloob Ahmad and Others
The Delhi High Court held that the General Body of a society has the exclusive right to amend its Memorandum of Association and to requisition meetings, quashing the restraint on holding the Special General Body Meeting and setting aside directions for financial audit.
Dr. Vikas Gupta v. Dr. Rajni Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of mental cruelty and desertion, emphasizing the cumulative effect of repeated separations and abandonment over 19 years of marriage.
Atul Punj v. IDBI Bank & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under RBI Master Directions, fraud classification in multiple banking requires consortium consensus and full disclosure of forensic audit reports to the borrower, directing IDBI Bank to furnish complete reports and reconsider its proceedings against the petitioner.
Avadh Kaushik v. Anant Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking enforcement of slip road construction, holding that it will not interfere with the expert administrative decision to adopt a comprehensive traffic decongestion plan.
Director General of Works (CPWD) v. Laljeet Yadav and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award reinstating contract labourers as employees with 50% back wages for illegal termination without notice under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Maya Ram Semwal v. Hotel Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition for non-compliance with a 2008 order as barred by the one-year limitation period under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Rahul Sachdeva Sole Proprietor, M/S V.K. Pipe Traders
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause in tax invoices is binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while directing ongoing mediation before arbitration proceedings.
Kiran D. Patki & Anr. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside probate granted on a Will containing uncountered alterations and directed payments from the estate while emphasizing the necessity to examine all attesting witnesses to establish a Will's authenticity.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Sanjeev Sehgal Proprietor of M/s. Radiant Industries
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause contained in tax invoices is binding and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate payment disputes, directing mediation before arbitration proceeds.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Shree Chaitnya Industries
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause in tax invoices is binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while allowing mediation to continue.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Mr. Rohit Sharma Sole Proprietor, M/s. Star Industries
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in tax invoices are binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes, while also referring the matter to mediation.
Sh Adesh Jain & Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed eviction orders issued under the East Punjab Holdings Act over land within the Extended Lal Dora area, holding that revenue authorities lack jurisdiction and the Civil Court has exclusive jurisdiction to decide title and possession disputes.
Swastik Pipe Ltd. v. Sachinav Arora Proprietor of Roohani Engg Works
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in tax invoices are binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes between the parties.