Delhi High Court

49,371 judgments

Year:

National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Vibhu Bahkru; Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:2996-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside GST refund rejection orders for lack of supporting assessment and violation of natural justice, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST refund Section 54 CGST Act refund rejection personal hearing

Malsh Charitable Trust v. Lieutenant Governor, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

16 Apr 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:3147

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition restraining coercive action by the Forest Department and directed adjudication of land demarcation disputes by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 28 of the Delhi Land Revenue Act, protecting possessory rights pending resolution.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant writ petition Article 226 Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 Section 28

M/S NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED v. M/S NANGIA CONSTRUCTION (I) PVT. LTD.

16 Apr 2024 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:2992-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding that the mobilization advance is a repayable loan despite wrongful termination, rejecting the subcontractor's claim for refund and limiting interest payable to the period after repayment to the Principal Employer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mobilization advance arbitral award bank guarantee wrongful termination

Kunal Kumar v. Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3055

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of an animal shelter operator holding unauthorized occupation of government-acquired land, affirming the State's right to evict encroachers without violating legal principles.

property petition_dismissed Significant government land acquisition encroachment possession demolition

Mukesh Kumar Jha and Ors. v. Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

16 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh

The Delhi High Court analyzed whether MP-IDSA qualifies as 'State' under Article 12, applying tests of pervasive government control and function, to determine maintainability of writ petitions seeking service regularization.

constitutional other Significant Article 12 Constitution of India instrumentality of State agency of Government writ jurisdiction

SH SUNNY SACHDEVA v. ACP NORTH RTI CELL AND ANR

16 Apr 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2024:DHC:3072-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the CIC order, holding that acceptance of amended RTI replies and initiation of departmental action preclude further judicial interference at this stage.

administrative appeal_dismissed Right to Information Act RTI departmental action incorrect information

Vijay Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3022-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that in absence of notified Recruitment Rules, no promotion or retrospective promotion to upgraded BSF legal posts can be granted, dismissing the petitioners' claims despite administrative delays.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Recruitment Rules Promotion Border Security Force Departmental Promotion Committee

Sunshine Capital Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - Circle-9(1), Delhi & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:3061-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for passing fresh assessment under Section 153(3) of the Income Tax Act begins when the Department becomes aware of the ITAT order, not strictly on formal receipt, and directed the Department to comply with the ITAT order including refund and release of attached properties.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153(3) ITAT order limitation period

Aarushi Gupta v. State GNCT of Delhi; Rishab Nayyar v. State GNCT of Delhi

16 Apr 2024 · Amit Mahajan

The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to applicants accused of abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, holding that mere mention in a suicide note without direct instigation evidence is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Pre-arrest bail Section 438 CrPC

Gulshan & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3042

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Manpreet Singh and Ors. v. State and Anr.

16 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3064

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Agni Deo Prasad and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee

The Delhi High Court held that the respondents cannot belatedly disturb the petitioners' long-standing seniority and promotions in the Railway Protection Force without valid reasons, setting aside the impugned seniority orders.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Rules Seniority fixation Legitimate expectation Article 226

Saroj Nijhawan & Ors. v. Seema Chhabra & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:3073-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory 45-day limit for filing replication under its Original Side Rules and refused to condone a 129-day delay caused by mediation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay replication mediation Delhi High Court Original Side Rules

M/S Scindia Potteries and Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3109

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing substitution of legal heirs after the plaintiff's death, condoning delay caused by COVID-19, and held that the right to sue for possession and injunction survives in favor of legal heirs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 3 CPC substitution of legal heirs abatement of suit limitation period

Anurag v. Indira Gandhi National Open University

16 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3079

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking original academic documents after the university confirmed dispatch and arrangements for collection of the mark-sheet and provisional degree.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition original mark-sheet provisional degree result declaration

Arpita Sahu v. GK Pillai

16 Apr 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3066

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition, holding that the petitioners are not entitled to regularization or monetary benefits for the period prior to their regular appointment as LDCs, and that merits of such claims cannot be adjudicated in contempt proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization Lower Division Clerk Central Secretariat Clerical Service Rules, 1962 Rule 12(b)

Surender Singh Deswal v. Delhi Development Authority

16 Apr 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2014:DHC:922-DB

The Delhi High Court held that successful writ petitioners for DDA flats delayed due to State fault must pay the price prevailing on the writ filing date, not the allotment date, with interest.

property appeal_allowed Significant DDA Housing Scheme 2008 wait-listed applicants price of allotment writ petition

Kamal Bhasin v. Ghanshyam Kumar & Anr.

16 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3093

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for failure to prove willful disobedience, holding that the respondents complied with the Court’s RTI disclosure directions regarding complaints against the then CMD of PFCL.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Willful disobedience Right to Information Act Section 8(1)(j) RTI

Jindal India Thermal Power Limited v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3052

The court held that release of pledged equity shares under the MRA requires valid transfer of 10% equity to lenders including execution of a Share Purchase Agreement, and until such compliance, the lenders are not obligated to release the shares.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Master Resolution Agreement pledge release equity shares transfer Share Purchase Agreement

M/S. KAWATRA TENTS AND CATERERS PVT. LTD. v. DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD

16 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3089

The Delhi High Court held that a unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by a disqualified party under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is void ab initio and stayed the arbitration proceedings pending further hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration unilateral appointment disqualification Section 12(5)