Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Union of India and Ors. v. Deepak Kumar Rana

23 Oct 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8282-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CAT order passed on consent, directing completion of appointment formalities within eight weeks, and imposed costs to deter frivolous challenges.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal consent order writ petition appointment process

Navneet v. Union of India and Anr

23 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:8586

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's appointment for failing to meet the mandatory educational qualification of studying Physics as prescribed in the recruitment advertisement for TGT (Maths).

administrative petition_dismissed Significant essential educational qualifications recruitment advertisement TGT (Mathematics) judicial review

Shaloo Gupta & Ors. v. Neeraj Khanna & Anr

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8341

The Delhi High Court disposed of a tenancy dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement whereby the tenants agreed to vacate the premises by a specified date and comply with payment and maintenance obligations.

property settled tenancy dispute amicable settlement vacation of premises user and occupation charges

Josh Media Vision Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Information Broadcasting & Anr.

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8358

The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to decide the petitioners' representation by a speaking order after personal hearing, keeping impugned orders in abeyance pending final decision.

administrative petition_allowed representation speaking order personal hearing government authority

Sachin Asthana v. Adnan Azam

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8359

The Delhi High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging an eviction order as infructuous after the landlord lawfully recovered possession through execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant eviction revision petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 execution proceedings

Suresh Chandra Gupta v. Union of India

23 Oct 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:8355
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition seeking release of seized goods, holding that factual disputes over seizure and custody require separate legal proceedings and contempt is not the appropriate remedy.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court seizure memo release of seized goods criminal trial

CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SURESH KASHYAP & ANR

23 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8239

Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment default disputes arising from a Credit Facility Agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12 sole arbitrator appointment

M/S ONCQUEST LABORATORIES LTD. v. M/S SDACC HEALTHCARE PVT LTD

23 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8371
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator upon finding a prima facie arbitration agreement and proper service, limiting its role to existence of the agreement without delving into merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie existence

Jagdish v. Union of India

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8427
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that limitation for filing a petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act begins only after apportionment of compensation under Sections 30 and 31, allowing the appeal and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18 Section 30 Section 31

Kumar Karan v. Usha Rani Sharma

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8428

A revision petition challenging an eviction order becomes infructuous and is liable to be dismissed once possession of the premises is legally restored to the landlord through execution proceedings.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 19 Section 25-B(8)

Sudershan Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Gupta

23 Oct 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8467

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the bona fide requirement for possession to establish a modern dental clinic was proved and the trial court's dismissal was perverse.

property appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e)

Balram @ Ballu v. Sanjay & Anr

23 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8527

The High Court held that the offending vehicle was driven rashly and negligently despite the injured's suicidal attempt, setting aside the Tribunal's award and remanding for compensation determination.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 rash and negligent driving Medical Legal Case (MLC) eyewitness testimony

M/S B.E. BILLIMORIA AND COMPANY LIMITED v. ASHOK KHANNA

23 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8530

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a 330-day delay in filing a revision petition due to unsatisfactory explanations and inconsistent reasons for the delay.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay Limitation Act 1963 Section 5 Section 151 CPC

Divya Bhaskar and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

23 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:8497

The Delhi High Court held that B.Ed. is not an essential qualification for Assistant Teacher posts under applicable Recruitment Rules and validated appointments made pursuant to a corrigendum excluding B.Ed. candidates, quashing the DoE's order declaring such appointments null and void.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Assistant Teacher Recruitment Rules B.Ed. qualification Corrigendum

KAD HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 6 DELHI

23 Oct 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8214-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reopening a tax assessment for AY 2015-16 beyond the ten-year limitation period prescribed under pre-amendment law is invalid, quashing the notice issued under Section 148.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148 Section 149(1) reopening of assessment

The Commissioner of Income Tax v. Zebra Technologies Asia Pacific Pet. Ltd.

23 Oct 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8234-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee must be given an opportunity to rebut treaty shopping allegations before invoking Section 263 to revise an assessment order.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 263 Income Tax Act Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement Treaty Shopping Permanent Establishment

ACROPOLIS REALTY PVT. LTD v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1-1, DELHI & ANR

23 Oct 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8220-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act is deemed issued only upon dispatch, and reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the three-year limitation period without valid extension are invalid.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A Section 149(1)(a) limitation period

Saddeekan Begum v. Bharati Axa General Insurance Co Ltd

23 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8695

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that rash and negligent driving was proved by credible eyewitness and medical evidence, setting aside the Tribunal's conversion of the claim to Section 163A and remanding for fresh compensation determination under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.

motor_vehicle_accident_compensation appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 163A rash and negligent driving

Ram Babu Mahto v. Bank of India

23 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J.

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Bank of India's policy denying subsidised accommodation to officers transferred on their own request, holding that acceptance of transfer conditions precludes entitlement to such benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed subsidised accommodation transfer on request Bank of India policy Inter-Office Memorandum 07.10.2017

Ashok Kumar Yadav and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

23 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:8778

Delhi High Court directs autonomous MAIDS to grant contractual nursing staff pay fixation and allowances from November 2012 as per departmental order, affirming equal pay and rejecting unjustified delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant contractual employees pay fixation office order 19.11.2012 autonomous institution