Full Text
Date of Decision: 23.10.2024
43974/2024 SACHIN ASTHANA .....Petitioner
Through: None.
Through: Mr. Zeeshan Ahmed, Adv.
JUDGMENT
1. None appears for the Petitioner today.
2. There was no appearance on the last date, i.e., 08.10.2024 as well.
3. This Court had on 08.10.2024 recorded as follows:
4. This Court has in RC.REV.419/2018 captioned Ashok Gupta & Anr. v. Deepak Rao dated 04.10.2024, has already taken the following view:
learned Trial Court. Pursuant thereto, the Respondent/landlord recovered possession of the demised premises in accordance with law. As such the Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order of the learned Trial Court which has now gained fruition and was executed and has already been implemented through execution proceedings. In these circumstances, the Revision Petition has become infructuous.
19. As stated above, the jurisdiction of this Court exercising revisionary powers is limited and circumspect. The Petitioner/tenant did not initiate civil proceedings for recovery of possession, instead the present Revision Petition was filed. The Petitioner/tenant has not contended that Section 19 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 has been violated. Relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the NC Daga case and Vinod Kumar Verma case, this Court finds that this Petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed.”
5. In view of the aforegoing, the Petition and all pending Applications stand dismissed.