Delhi High Court

49,371 judgments

Year:

Uttam Samadder v. The Union of India

06 May 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:3634-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a BSF personnel who voluntarily resigns before completing 20 years of qualifying service is not entitled to pensionary benefits under the CCS Pension Rules, 1972.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant BSF Rules 1969 CCS Pension Rules 1972 voluntary resignation pensionary benefits

Rohit Shukla; Vivek Kumar Gaurav; Shawez Chaudhary; A. Solanki v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3737
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s discharge of the accused in a rape case, holding no prima facie case was made out as the petitioner’s consent was voluntary and not vitiated by fraud.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant discharge of accused prima facie case Section 376 IPC consent and fraud

Pradeep Kaur v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

06 May 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:3681-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of a Health Trade License and demolition of a food cart, holding that compensation claims involving disputed facts must be pursued via civil suits, not writ petitions.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ jurisdiction monetary compensation health trade license municipal corporation

ACME Heergarh Powertech Private Limited v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs

06 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3615-DB

The Delhi High Court held that while solar power generation units fall outside the MOOWR Regulations due to the nature of electricity as a resultant good, the grant and cancellation of Customs licenses are quasi-judicial acts requiring due process, and executive instructions cannot fetter the independent discretion of Customs officers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 151A MOOWR Regulations quasi-judicial function

Anuj v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3627

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in recovery of commercial quantity of ganja, holding that no reasonable grounds existed to believe he was not guilty or unlikely to reoffend under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 37 NDPS Act bail under NDPS Act commercial quantity narcotics Section 439 CrPC

Bhushan Steel and Strips Ltd. v. Tyo Trading Enterprises and Ors.

06 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3734

The Delhi High Court upheld its territorial jurisdiction and decreed recovery against the defendant for loss of goods, affirming substitution of the plaintiff by Tata Steel Ltd. without fresh amendment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction recovery suit substitution of parties transportation liability

Aradhana v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

06 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3699
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside the charge framing order for lack of reasons and remanded the case for fresh consideration to ensure judicial mind is applied at the prima facie stage.

criminal other Significant framing of charge prima facie case Section 227 CrPC Section 228 CrPC

Crystal Crop Protection Limited v. Ranga Krishna Murthy

06 May 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:3628-DB

Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the order returning plaint for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that averments in the plaint must be accepted on demurrer and part of cause of action arose in Delhi.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC territorial jurisdiction cause of action demurrer

Hardeep v. University of Delhi & Ors.

06 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3704

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference in subjective examination marking is generally impermissible absent mala fides or arbitrariness and dismissed the student's challenge to awarded marks.

academic_law petition_dismissed subjective examination judicial review marks awarded examiner discretion

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. MEENAKSHI KHARE AND ORS.

06 May 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MANMOHAN; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2024:DHC:3705-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the re-appointment of employees in a merged school, ruling that valid original appointments under applicable rules cannot be invalidated despite alleged non-compliance with other recruitment criteria.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant appointment validity recruitment rules Delhi School Education Act, 1973 merger of schools

Shayam Sunder v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3611
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a large-scale insurance fraud case, holding that CDR evidence is corroborative and bail cannot be denied solely on the gravity of economic offences or incomplete investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offence cheating forgery

Gaurav v. The State Govt of NCT

06 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3616

Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a murder case considering doubtful evidence, lack of premeditation, and prolonged incarceration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail section 302 IPC culpable homicide exception 4 to section 300 IPC

PTECH INFRA ENGINEERING v. LITE BITE FOODS PVT LTD

06 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3692

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from Work Orders containing a valid arbitration clause.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause

IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. NUPUR SINGH & ORS.

06 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3663

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's finding of composite negligence by both drivers in a fatal accident and dismissed the insurer's appeal, affirming joint and several liability for compensation.

motor_accident_claims_criminal_liability appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim composite negligence liability apportionment insurance company liability

Raj Gangwani v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

06 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that grace marks are not applicable to re-appear exams and denied additional attempts beyond three attempts as per statutory guidelines, dismissing the petitioners' claims for grace marks and mercy chances.

academic/educational law appeal_dismissed Significant grace marks re-appear examination mercy chance Rehabilitation Council of India guidelines

Prem Singh v. State Bank of Travancore

06 May 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3655-DB

The Delhi High Court held that payments under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act are non-refundable subsistence allowances and cannot be adjusted against lumpsum compensation payable in lieu of reinstatement, thereby enhancing the appellant's compensation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Section 17B Industrial Disputes Act subsistence allowance lumpsum compensation reinstatement

Ammar Abdul Rahiman v. National Investigation Agency

06 May 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:3637-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the appellant in a UAPA case, holding that mere possession of extremist material without evidence of overt acts or dissemination is insufficient to deny bail under Section 43-D(5) of UAPA.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant UAPA Section 43-D(5) bail terrorist organization

Kamlesh Devi v. State of Delhi NCT & Anr.

06 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3633

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused mother involved in the kidnapping, sexual assault, and forced marriage of a minor, emphasizing prima facie involvement and risk of witness tampering.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. kidnapping of minor sexual assault abetment

Amit Chakraborty v. State NCT of Delhi

06 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3642

The Delhi High Court held that despite the bar under Section 306(4)(b) Cr.P.C., it can release an approver granted pardon under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., and accordingly ordered the release of a disabled petitioner who cooperated fully with the investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 306 Cr.P.C. pardon to approver Section 482 Cr.P.C. inherent powers of High Court

Amit Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement

06 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3653

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea for transfer to a private hospital, directing his return to jail with medical care and ordering an AIIMS Medical Board to assess his treatment needs.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC judicial custody medical treatment of prisoner clinical stability