Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Commissioner of Police and Ors. v. Smt Kanta Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order disallowing recovery of alleged overpayments from the widow of a deceased employee, emphasizing fairness, natural justice, and the Supreme Court's precedent in Rafiq Masih.
Mumbai International Airport Limited v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that existing leases excluded from demised premises under a lease agreement are not transferable under general contract clauses, limiting judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Amit Sood v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the respondent’s trademark "ROSHAN" for identical photography services, holding the petitioner’s prior use and goodwill established passing off and invalidating the registration.
M S Bharat Udyog v. Union of India
The Court held that when an order-in-original is set aside, the parties must be restored to their prior position, and refund of a pre-deposit appropriated from a Bank Guarantee cannot be claimed without furnishing equivalent security.
M/S HARI OM ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the GST department to expeditiously dispose of the petitioner's application for cancellation of GST registration after procedural compliance, emphasizing timely administrative action.
RELAXO FOOTWEARS LIMITED v. XS BRANDS CONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's injunction application, holding that the defendants' use of a similar 'X' device mark alongside their distinctive 'HRX' brand does not cause confusion or passing off given the crowded marketplace and coexistence of similar marks.
Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property v. Shailender Kumar and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that failure to examine witnesses to prove documentary evidence vitiates a departmental enquiry but allowed the employer to hold a fresh enquiry in compliance with procedural rules.
Dharmender Singh Bisht v. Babita Bisht
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on grounds of mental cruelty arising from the wife's false criminal allegations against him and his family.
Delhi Administration v. Balak Ram
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a milk vendor under the PFA Act, emphasizing limited appellate interference in acquittals, procedural non-compliance vitiating trial, and that marginal deviations in food standards do not necessarily imply adulteration.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's order invalidating the disciplinary enquiry against a DTC conductor for violation of natural justice and dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Karim Hotels Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Nizamuddin & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants infringed the plaintiffs' registered trademark "KARIM'S" by using a deceptively similar mark "KARIN'S" and granted permanent injunction and costs in favor of the plaintiffs.
Ved Praksh v. Land Acquisition Collector
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for filing a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act runs from the date of knowledge of the award, directing the Collector to forward the petitioners' reference to the court despite delay.
Tej Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging disciplinary dismissal for failure to sufficiently explain the inordinate delay and denied condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.
Dr. Amit Mishra v. The Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking termination of a 27-week pregnancy, holding that termination beyond 24 weeks is permissible only under the MTP Act’s strict conditions of fetal abnormalities or risk to the mother's life or health.
Kamal Bhasin v. Central Public Information Officer and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that disclosure of passing institutes of recruited executives is exempt personal information under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act and that the respondents complied with CIC directions.
Anil Madan v. Assistant Collector, GR-II & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive action pending listing and consideration of the petitioner's application for waiver of pre-deposit before the Tribunal.
Barkat Hussain v. Prabhas Nairain Misra (HUF)
The Delhi High Court quashed a Section 138 NI Act complaint holding that dishonour of a cheque issued as advance payment for undelivered goods does not constitute a criminal offence.
Army Welfare Housing Organisation v. Halko Infraprojects & Anr.
Delhi High Court dismissed writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction challenging arbitration reference by Mumbai MSME Facilitation Council under Section 18 of MSMED Act.
Raghavendra Krishnamurthy Yala Kodu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that an Executive Director and Promoter of a company can be summoned and prosecuted under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act, dismissing the petition to quash summons at the prima facie stage.
Achla Kapoor v. The Disciplinary Authority Zonal Manager Punjab and Sind Bank and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging compulsory retirement imposed for gross misconduct, holding no double punishment or procedural infirmity in the disciplinary proceedings.