Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Chanchal Singh v. Union of India

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8272-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for increment in light of Supreme Court rulings and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.

administrative petition_allowed increment writ petition Article 226 Supreme Court decision

Narmeta Manoj Kumar v. Union of India

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8275-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing a fresh Physical Endurance Test for a CISF constable who was compelled to appear while injured, emphasizing compassionate consideration of medical conditions in recruitment.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Physical Endurance Test Limited Departmental Competitive Exam Injury postponement Orthopaedic medical opinion

M/S New Horizons Asphalt Private Limited v. The Chief Commissioner of Custom and Anr.

24 Oct 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8293

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing release of detained imported rubber process oil due to procedural lapses in communicating hazardous waste test reports and non-compliance with statutory requirements.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Hazardous Waste Customs Act, 1962 Import duty Test report communication

BT GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

24 Oct 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8710-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act cannot be recharacterized as a draft order under Section 144C based on erroneous headings or order numbers, dismissing the petitioner's challenge accordingly.

tax petition_dismissed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 143(3) Section 144C Assessment order

Kanwar Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Jaswinder Singh Bhatia

24 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8326
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court allowed the defendant's petition to summon a GST official to produce records on input tax credit, directing the Trial Court to rehear arguments after recording such evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant GST input tax credit summoning official witness commercial suit trial court discretion

Rathod Realty Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. George M. Cherian

24 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8328

The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Article 227 lies with the High Court where the cause of action arose and allowed the petitioners to withdraw their petition to approach the appropriate jurisdictional High Court.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 227 jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission cause of action

Kusum Jain v. Suresh Chand Jain

24 Oct 2024 · MANMOHAN, CJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:8331-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of a decree on admitted claim under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that contested adverse possession negates any admission by the defendant.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XII Rule 6 CPC admission adverse possession possession

Pawan Kumar Garg & Anr v. Punjab National Bank

24 Oct 2024 · Manmohan; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:8332-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal challenging refusal of interim relief against a bank's fraud declaration, holding such interlocutory orders are generally not appealable and must comply with due process.

civil appeal_dismissed Letters Patent Appeal interim relief declaration of fraud natural justice

Union of India v. Hemraj Singh

24 Oct 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8307-DB

The High Court allowed the Union of India to withdraw their writ petition challenging the CAT judgment to pursue a review before the Tribunal.

administrative other Procedural writ petition withdrawal Central Administrative Tribunal review petition factual errors

Vivek Kumar Saxena v. M/S College Book Store

24 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8372

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to allow a delayed written statement and dismissed the petition challenging ex-parte proceedings in a commercial suit, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VIII Rule 1 CPC written statement ex-parte proceedings

Suman Kumari & Ors. v. National Ins Co Ltd & Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8524

The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claimants' appeal, holding that rash and negligent driving by the crane vehicle caused the fatal accident and remanded the matter for quantification of compensation.

motor_vehicles appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 Section 140 rash and negligent driving

Randhir Singh and Others v. Union of India and Another

24 Oct 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8412

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation for agricultural land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act by treating it as semi-urban land with potentiality, relying on adjoining urbanized land rates and statutory principles.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Indicative Price Policy

Council of Architecture v. AR Bela Agrawal & Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Manmohan, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:8348-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of a suspension order against an architect consultant, emphasizing procedural fairness and limiting the regulatory body's jurisdiction in contractual disputes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Council of Architecture professional misconduct Architects (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 1989 natural justice

Rahul Nath v. Registrar of Firms and Societies and Anr

24 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8432

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for disputes involving contested facts and pending civil suits, and declined interim relief against gate pass charges levied by a society.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 disputed questions of fact alternative remedy

PROMOSHIRT SM. S.A. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8548
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Trade Marks to renew and restore a trademark registration delayed due to the Registry's failure to issue the registration certificate and mandatory renewal notice within statutory timelines.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trademark renewal Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 23(1) Section 25(3)

PROMOSHIRT SM. S.A. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8551
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a trademark proprietor cannot be penalized for the Registry's delay in issuing registration certificates and failure to issue mandatory renewal notices, directing restoration and renewal of the trademark registration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark renewal O-3 notice Trade Marks Act 1999 Trademark Registry delay

PROMOSHIRT SM. S.A. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8550
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Trademark Registry's failure to timely issue the registration certificate and renewal notice does not bar renewal, directing restoration of the trademark registration.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trademark renewal Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 25(3) Form O-3 notice

PROMOSHIRT SM. PVT. LTD. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8549

The Delhi High Court held that the Trademark Registry's failure to issue timely renewal notices and delayed registration certificate issuance cannot prejudice the proprietor, directing restoration and renewal of the trademark registration.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trademark renewal Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 25(3) Renewal notice

M/S. BANS INTERNATIONAL v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) & ANR

24 Oct 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8265-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals challenging customs classification affecting the rate of duty lie exclusively with the Supreme Court under Section 130E and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

customs appeal_dismissed Significant customs classification rate of duty Section 130E Customs Act jurisdiction

DISHA ENTERPRISES v. J S S INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR PVT LTD AND ORS

24 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8415
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that invocation of arbitration is not barred by limitation until the cause of action arises, pending Section 138 NI Act proceedings do not preclude arbitration, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Limitation period Cause of action