Delhi High Court

49,371 judgments

Year:

M/S SHREE PADMA INDUSTRIES v. UNION OF INDIA

17 May 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:4103-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to non-provision of annexure and remitted the matter for re-adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity to reply and be heard.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Input Tax Credit natural justice

S S Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax & Anr.

17 May 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:4102-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective reasons and proper notice, setting aside retrospective cancellation from 2017 and limiting it to the date of order in 2019.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act Show Cause Notice

Vandana Gupta v. Surender Kumar

17 May 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:4010

The Delhi High Court held that the landlord is the best judge of suitability of premises for bona fide requirement and set aside the order granting leave to contest eviction based on alleged alternate accommodation in a garage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction bona fide requirement

SANDEEP KOHLI & ORS. v. VEENA SARWAL & ORS.

17 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6122

The Delhi High Court clarified that an interim arbitral order restraining trademark use on digital platforms applies only to future business ventures and does not affect existing businesses, thereby maintaining status quo during arbitration.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Interim order Trademark use Moti Mahal Delux

Dr. Suman Bala v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

17 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1025-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid from the date of retirement and remanded the issue of the interest rate to the Tribunal for uniform determination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant retiral benefits interest on delayed payment gratuity arrears commutation of pension

Shyam Singh v. M C D

17 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1514-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits of a government employee accrues from the date of retirement, modifying the Tribunal's order to ensure payment with interest from that date.

administrative petition_allowed Significant retiral benefits interest on delayed payment government employee retirement Central Administrative Tribunal

Dr. Shamoli Kundu v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

17 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7716

The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, not from the Tribunal's order, and modified the interest rate accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed Significant retiral benefits interest on delayed payment Central Administrative Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi

S v. Jeet Singh & Anr.

16 May 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4134

The Delhi High Court directed police to enhance protection measures for a petitioner facing social media harassment and threats from relatives, ensuring police responsiveness and surveillance to safeguard her and her family.

criminal petition_allowed protection order harassment social media stalking police duty

Nawabuddin v. Salahuddin & Anr.

16 May 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:4056

In a family partition suit over jointly owned property, the Delhi High Court directed sale of the property and division of proceeds among co-owners due to lack of consensus on physical partition, and impleaded the transferee of a co-owner's share as a party.

family other partition suit co-owners family property dispute physical partition

Subhash Sharma v. Govt of NCT, Delhi & Ors.

16 May 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3980

Criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act were quashed as the petitioner was exonerated on identical charges in departmental proceedings, making continuation an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR departmental proceedings exoneration prevention of corruption

Naveen Kumar v. Union of India

16 May 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:4006-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the composite marking scheme in a recruitment exam, holding that courts will not interfere with predetermined evaluation procedures uniformly applied by the examination authority.

administrative petition_dismissed marking scheme examination evaluation composite marks judicial interference

PT BUKAKA TEKNIK UTAMA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT), DELHI - 2

16 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4005-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an assessee whose appeal before CIT(A) was dismissed on delay grounds but whose limitation for further appeal had not expired as on the specified date is eligible for settlement benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.

tax petition_allowed Significant Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 Income Tax Appeal Limitation period Disputed tax arrears

Sanjay Singh Yadav v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.

16 May 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:4008-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a departmental candidate who failed to join service timely, holding that continuation of lien does not entitle a candidate to recruitment benefits without availability and willingness to join.

administrative appeal_dismissed departmental candidate continuing lien physical measurement and endurance test letters patent appeal

Central Council of Homoeopathy v. Vijay Singh

16 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh, J · 2024:DHC:4061

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's order that the Central Council of Homeopathy is an industry and that compulsory retirement of an employee during pendency of an industrial dispute without permission violates Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, entitling reinstatement with back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 Section 31 Section 33-A

Sangam (India) Ltd v. The National Highway Authority of India & Anr

16 May 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:3971-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the challenge to an arbitral award on toll collection contract fraud, holding that deliberate active concealment by NHAI renders the contract voidable despite the Exception to Section 19 of the Contract Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant fraudulent misrepresentation active concealment Exception to Section 19 Indian Contract Act, 1872

Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. (CS) Ltd. v. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd.

16 May 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:3969-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal's interim award rejecting limitation is a challengeable award under the Arbitration Act, and limitation for contract claims accrues on breach (non-payment after quantification), not on the date of the force majeure event.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limitation Interim award Section 34 challenge

Sarjeet Singh v. Union of India

16 May 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:4105-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an EWS certificate issued by a Naib Tehsildar and countersigned by the Tehsildar after the application deadline is invalid for reservation benefits, dismissing the petitioner's claim for inclusion under the EWS category in CAPF recruitment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Economically Weaker Section EWS certificate Income and Asset Certificate Competent authority

Communication Components Antenna Inc. v. Mobi Antenna Technologies (Shenzhen) Co Ltd

16 May 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:3975

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Indian Patent No.240893 and held that Defendant No.1 infringed the patent, granting permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent Infringement Indian Patent No.240893 Asymmetrical Beams Spectrum Efficiency

Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. v. Dineshkumar Laxmanbhai Virda

16 May 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:3974

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark CITIZEN for machines including lathe machines, and the defendant’s use of identical marks amounts to infringement and passing off, granting permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark Infringement Passing Off Registered Proprietor Trade Marks Act 1999

Manash Lifestyle Private Limited v. OCP Tech Industries Private Limited & Ors.

16 May 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:4651

Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off of Plaintiff's "GOOD VIBES" cosmetic products, awarding nominal damages and costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement trade dress passing off summary judgment