Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
SANDEEP KOHLI & ORS. v. VEENA SARWAL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court clarified that an interim arbitral order restraining trademark use on digital platforms applies only to future business ventures and does not affect existing businesses, thereby maintaining status quo during arbitration.
Dr. Suman Bala v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid from the date of retirement and remanded the issue of the interest rate to the Tribunal for uniform determination.
Shyam Singh v. M C D
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits of a government employee accrues from the date of retirement, modifying the Tribunal's order to ensure payment with interest from that date.
Dr. Shamoli Kundu v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, not from the Tribunal's order, and modified the interest rate accordingly.
S v. Jeet Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed police to enhance protection measures for a petitioner facing social media harassment and threats from relatives, ensuring police responsiveness and surveillance to safeguard her and her family.
Nawabuddin v. Salahuddin & Anr.
In a family partition suit over jointly owned property, the Delhi High Court directed sale of the property and division of proceeds among co-owners due to lack of consensus on physical partition, and impleaded the transferee of a co-owner's share as a party.
Subhash Sharma v. Govt of NCT, Delhi & Ors.
Criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act were quashed as the petitioner was exonerated on identical charges in departmental proceedings, making continuation an abuse of process.
Naveen Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the composite marking scheme in a recruitment exam, holding that courts will not interfere with predetermined evaluation procedures uniformly applied by the examination authority.
PT BUKAKA TEKNIK UTAMA v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT), DELHI - 2
The Delhi High Court held that an assessee whose appeal before CIT(A) was dismissed on delay grounds but whose limitation for further appeal had not expired as on the specified date is eligible for settlement benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Sanjay Singh Yadav v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a departmental candidate who failed to join service timely, holding that continuation of lien does not entitle a candidate to recruitment benefits without availability and willingness to join.
Central Council of Homoeopathy v. Vijay Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's order that the Central Council of Homeopathy is an industry and that compulsory retirement of an employee during pendency of an industrial dispute without permission violates Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, entitling reinstatement with back wages.
Sangam (India) Ltd v. The National Highway Authority of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court remanded the challenge to an arbitral award on toll collection contract fraud, holding that deliberate active concealment by NHAI renders the contract voidable despite the Exception to Section 19 of the Contract Act.
Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. (CS) Ltd. v. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal's interim award rejecting limitation is a challengeable award under the Arbitration Act, and limitation for contract claims accrues on breach (non-payment after quantification), not on the date of the force majeure event.
Sarjeet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an EWS certificate issued by a Naib Tehsildar and countersigned by the Tehsildar after the application deadline is invalid for reservation benefits, dismissing the petitioner's claim for inclusion under the EWS category in CAPF recruitment.
Communication Components Antenna Inc. v. Mobi Antenna Technologies (Shenzhen) Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Indian Patent No.240893 and held that Defendant No.1 infringed the patent, granting permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff.
Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. v. Dineshkumar Laxmanbhai Virda
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark CITIZEN for machines including lathe machines, and the defendant’s use of identical marks amounts to infringement and passing off, granting permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff.
Manash Lifestyle Private Limited v. OCP Tech Industries Private Limited & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off of Plaintiff's "GOOD VIBES" cosmetic products, awarding nominal damages and costs.
Advance Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Spack Turnkey Projects P. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dissolved a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, concluding winding up proceedings as the Official Liquidator could not proceed further due to lack of assets.
A.R. Construction v. C.C.C. Infrasys Private Limited
The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition pending under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, in light of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, holding that such proceedings not at an advanced stage must be adjudicated by the NCLT.
M/s Moradabad Syntex Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve M/s Moradabad Syntex Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, concluding the winding up process due to lack of assets.