Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Subhash Arora v. Kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:6920

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application of a third party claiming possession without title to set aside a decree and protect possession under Order XXI Rules 97 to 103 CPC, holding that possession alone does not bar execution of a valid decree.

civil petition_dismissed Order XXI Rules 97 to 103 CPC possession decree Agreement to Sell

Sanjay Goyal v. Shanti Devi

06 Sep 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6825

The Delhi High Court held that mere possession as a licensee post-termination does not confer adverse possession, upheld the Respondent's title, and granted stay of execution subject to deposit of decretal amount under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession licensee limitation mesne profits

Suyojit Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. IIC Limited

06 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6893

The Delhi High Court held that insolvency or liquidation of a party does not bar extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and granted a six-month extension.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral Tribunal mandate extension Section 29A(4) Arbitration and Conciliation Act liquidation CIRP

Smt Manju Garg v. Sh Sanjay Gupta & Anr.

06 Sep 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:6885

The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful settlement agreement reached through court-annexed mediation as a decree and granted a full refund of court fees to the plaintiff under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Court-annexed mediation Court Fees Act, 1870 Refund of court fees

Ajay Baluja v. Abhishek Dutt

06 Sep 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:6884

The Delhi High Court decreed a civil suit based on a Settlement Agreement and allowed partial refund of court fees under Section 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Court Fees Act 1870 Section 16A

Rizauddin @ Riyajuddin @ Riyajudden @ Pintu v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:6831-DB

Preventive detention orders against a person already in judicial custody are invalid if the detaining authority fails to record cogent material showing likelihood of bail and necessity of detention to prevent prejudicial activities.

criminal petition_allowed Significant preventive detention PITNDPS Act NDPS Act judicial custody

Mithila Murada v. Akhilesh Bali

06 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6877-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the family court appeal directing withdrawal of duplicate visitation applications, regulated supervised visitation, and upheld maintenance payments with arrears clearance, emphasizing avoidance of multiplicity of litigation and child welfare.

family appeal_allowed Significant visitation rights maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Family Court

Spectra Televentures Pvt Ltd v. Alliance Telenet Pvt. Ltd.

06 Sep 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:6810

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff completed the subcontracted work and is entitled to recover the unpaid amount with interest from the defendant who received full payment from the higher contractor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant commercial contract subcontracting completion of work payment recovery

Dr Mohd Ashfaq v. Chetan Sharma

06 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6876

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction at a belated stage of a suit, emphasizing the need to demonstrate prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss despite delay.

civil appeal_dismissed interim injunction Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC specific performance delay in pressing application

Pawan Bajaj & Ors. v. Gopal Krishan (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6875

The High Court upheld the impleadment of a deceased defendant's legal representative in a pending appeal based on his undertaking to adopt the deceased's stand, despite an adverse trial court report.

civil appeal_dismissed legal representatives Order XXII Rule 5 CPC impleadment civil suit

Jagadish Nangineni v. Directorate of Enforcement

06 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6842

The Delhi High Court quashed the Look-Out Circular against the petitioner, holding that in absence of flight risk and with anticipatory bail granted, travel restrictions via LOC are unjustified.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Look-Out Circular Enforcement Directorate Prevention of Money Laundering Act anticipatory bail

Neelam Ahuja v. Raj Ahuja & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6974
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a widowed daughter-in-law from her matrimonial home under the Senior Citizens Act, balancing her residence rights under the PWDV Act against the senior citizen owner’s right to eviction and alternate accommodation.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 right to residence eviction

Sangeeta Goyal v. Commissioner of Customs (Exports)

06 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:6845-DB

The Delhi High Court held that recovery proceedings under the Customs Act cannot be continued against legal heirs of a deceased sole proprietor without valid notice, quashing the recovery initiated posthumously.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Duty Drawback Recovery Proceedings Show Cause Notice

Abhay Raj Verma v. Shri Paw An Singh & Ors.

06 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6874

The High Court held that an ex parte defendant who has not filed a written statement cannot lead substantive evidence but may be examined as a witness by a co-defendant, subject to procedural safeguards.

civil petition_dismissed Significant ex parte defendant written statement civil procedure examination of witnesses

Ravinder Singh, Raveesha Gupta, Ansuiya, Ritvik Bhardwaj and Shivansh Maini v. Delhi University

06 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

Delhi High Court held that thirteen B.A. programs at St. Stephen’s College are distinct for seat allocation, upheld Delhi University’s 5% extra seat policy with rounding up fractions, and directed admission of meritorious petitioners despite College’s objections.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Common University Entrance Test Common Seat Allocation System Minority Educational Institution Article 30(1)

Siddharth Taneja v. State

06 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7245

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the defence of security cheque and theft of pledged goods are to be adjudicated at trial and do not negate a prima facie case.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC security cheque pledge agreement

Vijay Kaushik v. Commissioner of Police

05 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6790-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking appointment and seniority from the 2007 police recruitment, holding that a candidate not meeting cut-off marks and not on a waiting list has no right to appointment from unfilled vacancies carried forward to subsequent recruitments.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant recruitment waiting list cut-off marks departmental candidates

Tek Chand and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

05 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6834-DB

The Delhi High Court held that conferment of Local Rank under Rule 76B does not entitle officers to retrospective seniority or pay, dismissing the petitioners' claim for promotion seniority from the date of Local Rank.

administrative petition_dismissed Local Rank Assistant Commandant Central Reserve Police Force Rules Rule 76B

Krishna Kumar Singh v. Union of India

05 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6818-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that adverse remarks in an APAR are expunged when disagreed with by Reviewing and Accepting Officers, and directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s promotion benefits ignoring such remarks.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Annual Performance Assessment Report APAR Reporting Officer Reviewing Officer

Lal Mohammad v. State

05 Sep 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:6828

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act, holding that intention to cause death can be inferred from the nature and severity of injuries and corroborative forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempt to murder Intention to cause death Forensic evidence